Seroprevalence study using oral rapid HIV testing in a large urban emergency department.

The Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.021
Sachin Jain, Erik S Lowman, Adam Kessler, Jaime Harper, Dino P Rumoro, Kimberly Y Smith, Yanina Purim-Shem-Tov, Harold A Kessler
{"title":"Seroprevalence study using oral rapid HIV testing in a large urban emergency department.","authors":"Sachin Jain,&nbsp;Erik S Lowman,&nbsp;Adam Kessler,&nbsp;Jaime Harper,&nbsp;Dino P Rumoro,&nbsp;Kimberly Y Smith,&nbsp;Yanina Purim-Shem-Tov,&nbsp;Harold A Kessler","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends universal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing for patients aged 13-64 years in health care settings where the seroprevalence is>0.1%. Rapid HIV testing has several advantages; however, recent studies have raised concerns about false positives in populations with low seroprevalence.</p><p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To determine the seroprevalence of HIV in our Emergency Department (ED) population, understand patient preferences toward rapid testing in the ED, and evaluate the performance of a rapid oral HIV test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A serosurvey offered oral rapid HIV 1/2 testing (OraQuick ADVANCE, Bethlehem, PA) to a convenience sample of 1348 ED patients beginning August 2008. Subjects declining participation were asked to complete an opt-out survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1000 patients were tested. Twelve had positive results (1.2%), including one who had newly diagnosed HIV infection; 988 patients tested negative. Of these, 335 (33.3%) had never been tested; 640 had prior history of a negative HIV test. No false-positive rapid HIV results were detected; 98.7% received the results of their preliminary HIV test, including 100% of those who tested positive. Most subjects who declined testing cited either a recent negative HIV test (160/348) or low perceived risk (65/348). A minority cited a concern regarding their privacy (11/348) or that the test might delay their treatment (7/348).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The seroprevalence estimate of 1.2% was above the rate recommended by the CDC for routine universal opt-out testing in our study population. The acceptance rate of rapid HIV testing and the percentage of patients receiving results approximated other recent reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":501218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e269-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.021","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends universal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing for patients aged 13-64 years in health care settings where the seroprevalence is>0.1%. Rapid HIV testing has several advantages; however, recent studies have raised concerns about false positives in populations with low seroprevalence.

Study objectives: To determine the seroprevalence of HIV in our Emergency Department (ED) population, understand patient preferences toward rapid testing in the ED, and evaluate the performance of a rapid oral HIV test.

Methods: A serosurvey offered oral rapid HIV 1/2 testing (OraQuick ADVANCE, Bethlehem, PA) to a convenience sample of 1348 ED patients beginning August 2008. Subjects declining participation were asked to complete an opt-out survey.

Results: 1000 patients were tested. Twelve had positive results (1.2%), including one who had newly diagnosed HIV infection; 988 patients tested negative. Of these, 335 (33.3%) had never been tested; 640 had prior history of a negative HIV test. No false-positive rapid HIV results were detected; 98.7% received the results of their preliminary HIV test, including 100% of those who tested positive. Most subjects who declined testing cited either a recent negative HIV test (160/348) or low perceived risk (65/348). A minority cited a concern regarding their privacy (11/348) or that the test might delay their treatment (7/348).

Conclusions: The seroprevalence estimate of 1.2% was above the rate recommended by the CDC for routine universal opt-out testing in our study population. The acceptance rate of rapid HIV testing and the percentage of patients receiving results approximated other recent reports.

在一个大型城市急诊科使用口服快速HIV检测进行血清流行率研究。
背景:美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)建议在卫生保健机构中对血清阳性率>0.1%的13-64岁患者进行普遍的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)检测。快速艾滋病毒检测有几个优点;然而,最近的研究引起了对低血清阳性率人群假阳性的关注。研究目的:确定急诊科(ED)人群中HIV的血清患病率,了解患者对急诊科快速检测的偏好,并评估快速口服HIV检测的性能。方法:从2008年8月开始,一项针对1348例ED患者的血清调查提供了口服快速HIV 1/2检测(OraQuick ADVANCE, Bethlehem, PA)。拒绝参与的受试者被要求完成一份选择退出调查。结果:共检测1000例患者。12例阳性(1.2%),包括1例新诊断的HIV感染;988名患者检测呈阴性。其中,335人(33.3%)从未接受过检测;640人有HIV阴性史。未检出HIV快速检测结果假阳性;98.7%的人收到了艾滋病毒初步检测的结果,其中100%的人检测呈阳性。大多数拒绝检测的受试者要么是近期HIV检测呈阴性(160/348),要么是感知风险较低(65/348)。少数人表示担心他们的隐私(11/348)或测试可能会延迟他们的治疗(7/348)。结论:在我们的研究人群中,血清阳性率估计为1.2%,高于CDC推荐的常规普遍选择退出检测的比率。艾滋病毒快速检测的接受率和接受结果的患者百分比与最近的其他报告相近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书