Restorative rehabilitation robotics to promote function, independence and dignity: users' perspectives on clinical applications.

Q3 Engineering
Luke Hampshire, Abbas Dehghani-Sanij, Rory James O'Connor
{"title":"Restorative rehabilitation robotics to promote function, independence and dignity: users' perspectives on clinical applications.","authors":"Luke Hampshire,&nbsp;Abbas Dehghani-Sanij,&nbsp;Rory James O'Connor","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2022.2089256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with mobility impairments have reported that improving their walking is one of the most important goals of their rehabilitation. Novel robotic technologies using powered exoskeletons for the lower limb could potentially offer efficient and less labour-intensive approaches to rehabilitation with shorter recovery times. To gather users' and carers' perspectives of assistive device use to provide information to design personalised and safe mobility rehabilitation technology. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with people with experience of mobility impairments. Iterative data collection was used to gather information about the social phenomena surrounding patient interaction and requirements for assistive devices for mobility impairments. Cycles of continuous data collection and thematic analysis using a theoretical, semantic approach was used to develop key themes within the data. We interviewed eight people: six people with mobility impairments and two carers. We identified five main themes: relationship with assistive technology, requirements for assistive technology, function and goal setting, personal factors to assistive device use and psychosocial factors to assistive device use. There was variability in the importance placed on each theme, particularly in the trade-off between the function and comfort of assistive technology. Patients emphasised the need for assistive technology to be personalised; they reported the ability to stand, control spasticity and involvement in community roles as key goals of their rehabilitation. These results highlight the variation in requirements for assistive technology between people with different mobility impairments; individuals' experiences are unique and future prototypes need to account for different levels of impairments and personal goals. These findings will also inform the user evaluation stage of assistive device testing. The acceptability of assistive devices is dependent upon a number of factors, including personalisation, comfort and function. Future pilot studies should gather qualitative data to determine the acceptability of actual device use.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2022.2089256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

People with mobility impairments have reported that improving their walking is one of the most important goals of their rehabilitation. Novel robotic technologies using powered exoskeletons for the lower limb could potentially offer efficient and less labour-intensive approaches to rehabilitation with shorter recovery times. To gather users' and carers' perspectives of assistive device use to provide information to design personalised and safe mobility rehabilitation technology. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with people with experience of mobility impairments. Iterative data collection was used to gather information about the social phenomena surrounding patient interaction and requirements for assistive devices for mobility impairments. Cycles of continuous data collection and thematic analysis using a theoretical, semantic approach was used to develop key themes within the data. We interviewed eight people: six people with mobility impairments and two carers. We identified five main themes: relationship with assistive technology, requirements for assistive technology, function and goal setting, personal factors to assistive device use and psychosocial factors to assistive device use. There was variability in the importance placed on each theme, particularly in the trade-off between the function and comfort of assistive technology. Patients emphasised the need for assistive technology to be personalised; they reported the ability to stand, control spasticity and involvement in community roles as key goals of their rehabilitation. These results highlight the variation in requirements for assistive technology between people with different mobility impairments; individuals' experiences are unique and future prototypes need to account for different levels of impairments and personal goals. These findings will also inform the user evaluation stage of assistive device testing. The acceptability of assistive devices is dependent upon a number of factors, including personalisation, comfort and function. Future pilot studies should gather qualitative data to determine the acceptability of actual device use.

促进功能、独立和尊严的恢复性康复机器人:用户对临床应用的看法。
有行动障碍的人报告说,改善他们的步行是他们康复的最重要目标之一。使用动力外骨骼的新型机器人技术可以为下肢提供更有效、更少劳动密集型的康复方法,并缩短恢复时间。收集使用者及护理人员对辅助器具使用情况的看法,为设计个人化及安全的行动康复技术提供资料。对有行动障碍经历的人进行半结构化访谈。迭代数据收集用于收集有关患者互动的社会现象和对行动障碍辅助设备的需求的信息。使用理论、语义方法的连续数据收集和专题分析循环用于开发数据中的关键主题。我们采访了8个人:6个行动不便的人和2个护理人员。我们确定了五个主题:与辅助技术的关系,对辅助技术的要求,功能和目标设定,辅助设备使用的个人因素和辅助设备使用的社会心理因素。每个主题的重要性各不相同,特别是在辅助技术的功能和舒适度之间的权衡。患者强调需要个性化的辅助技术;他们报告说,站立能力、控制痉挛和参与社区活动是他们康复的关键目标。这些结果突出了不同行动障碍人群对辅助技术需求的差异;每个人的经历都是独一无二的,未来的原型需要考虑到不同程度的缺陷和个人目标。这些发现也将为辅助设备测试的用户评估阶段提供信息。辅助装置的可接受性取决于许多因素,包括个性化、舒适性和功能。未来的试点研究应收集定性数据,以确定实际设备使用的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信