Does number of ports affect outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy? Retrospective chart-review study.

ISRN surgery Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-01 DOI:10.5402/2012/745964
Tariq O Abbas, Adel Ismail
{"title":"Does number of ports affect outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy? Retrospective chart-review study.","authors":"Tariq O Abbas,&nbsp;Adel Ismail","doi":"10.5402/2012/745964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Although open Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy is the gold standard for the surgical management of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, laparoscopic pyloromyotomy has been found highly successful. Various factors, however, can affect the outcomes of surgical interventions in these patients. We observed a relationship between the number of ports used and outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomies. Methods. We retrospectively assessed the medical records of selected group of patients who underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in our institution. Factors analyzed included operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and time to postoperative full feeding. Results. We observed failure of myotomy in both two patients who underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy using only two working ports compared to successful myotomies in the remaining patients. Conclusion. Laparoscopy provides good results in terms of intraoperative exposure and cosmesis. However, standardized surgical technique with two working ports is advisable, and this can trigger further research to be ascertained.</p>","PeriodicalId":89400,"journal":{"name":"ISRN surgery","volume":" ","pages":"745964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/745964","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/745964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Although open Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy is the gold standard for the surgical management of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, laparoscopic pyloromyotomy has been found highly successful. Various factors, however, can affect the outcomes of surgical interventions in these patients. We observed a relationship between the number of ports used and outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomies. Methods. We retrospectively assessed the medical records of selected group of patients who underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in our institution. Factors analyzed included operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and time to postoperative full feeding. Results. We observed failure of myotomy in both two patients who underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy using only two working ports compared to successful myotomies in the remaining patients. Conclusion. Laparoscopy provides good results in terms of intraoperative exposure and cosmesis. However, standardized surgical technique with two working ports is advisable, and this can trigger further research to be ascertained.

Abstract Image

腹腔镜幽门切开术患者的门静脉数量是否影响预后?回顾性图表回顾研究。
背景。尽管开放式Ramstedt幽门肌切开术是婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄手术治疗的金标准,但腹腔镜幽门肌切开术已被发现非常成功。然而,各种因素会影响这些患者手术干预的结果。我们观察到在接受腹腔镜幽门子宫切开术的患者中使用的端口数量和结果之间的关系。方法。我们回顾性地评估了在我院接受腹腔镜幽门肌切开术的患者的医疗记录。分析的影响因素包括手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症和术后全饲时间。结果。我们观察到,两名接受腹腔镜幽门肌切开术的患者仅使用两个工作端口,而其余患者的子宫切开术成功。结论。腹腔镜在术中暴露和美容方面提供了良好的结果。然而,标准化的手术技术与两个工作端口是可取的,这可以引发进一步的研究来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信