Direct volumetric flow cytometric quantitation of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells.

K Gutensohn, A Nikolitsis, M Gramatzki, D Spitzer, U Buwitt-Beckmann, A Humpe
{"title":"Direct volumetric flow cytometric quantitation of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells.","authors":"K Gutensohn,&nbsp;A Nikolitsis,&nbsp;M Gramatzki,&nbsp;D Spitzer,&nbsp;U Buwitt-Beckmann,&nbsp;A Humpe","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01155.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we compared a classic single-platform (SP) method applying beads for enumeration of CD45+ or CD34+ cells with a new device allowing direct volumetric measurements of stem and progenitor cells.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Following apheresis and cyropreservation, the precise enumeration of CD34+ cells as key parameter of graft quality is mandatory for the clinical course after transplantation. Currently, flow cytometry with SP technique represents the 'gold standard' for such determinations.</p><p><strong>Methods/materials: </strong>Fresh samples, 14 from mobilised peripheral blood (PB), 9 from apheresis products (AP) and 13 samples from frozen-thawed (FT) haematopoietic progenitor cell grafts, were analysed for CD34+ cells, CD45+ cells, and in frozen-thawed samples for viability by a bead-based flow cytometric method and in parallel by a direct, volumetric flow cytometric method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of CD34+ analyses revealed a significant correlation (P < 0·01) for each material between both techniques with r = 0·95 (PB), r = 0·933 (AP) and r = 0·929 (FT). Also, for analysis of CD45+ cells µL(-1) , the measured numbers evaluated with the different techniques did not significantly differ for all three materials analysed. In frozen-thawed samples, the analysis of viability was comparable for both techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate that a direct volumetric analysis of CD34+ cells µL(-1) or CD45+ cells µL(-1) is feasible. This technique represents a simple and economical approach for standardisation of progenitor and stem cell analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":442504,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"205-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01155.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01155.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we compared a classic single-platform (SP) method applying beads for enumeration of CD45+ or CD34+ cells with a new device allowing direct volumetric measurements of stem and progenitor cells.

Background: Following apheresis and cyropreservation, the precise enumeration of CD34+ cells as key parameter of graft quality is mandatory for the clinical course after transplantation. Currently, flow cytometry with SP technique represents the 'gold standard' for such determinations.

Methods/materials: Fresh samples, 14 from mobilised peripheral blood (PB), 9 from apheresis products (AP) and 13 samples from frozen-thawed (FT) haematopoietic progenitor cell grafts, were analysed for CD34+ cells, CD45+ cells, and in frozen-thawed samples for viability by a bead-based flow cytometric method and in parallel by a direct, volumetric flow cytometric method.

Results: Comparison of CD34+ analyses revealed a significant correlation (P < 0·01) for each material between both techniques with r = 0·95 (PB), r = 0·933 (AP) and r = 0·929 (FT). Also, for analysis of CD45+ cells µL(-1) , the measured numbers evaluated with the different techniques did not significantly differ for all three materials analysed. In frozen-thawed samples, the analysis of viability was comparable for both techniques.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that a direct volumetric analysis of CD34+ cells µL(-1) or CD45+ cells µL(-1) is feasible. This technique represents a simple and economical approach for standardisation of progenitor and stem cell analyses.

CD34+干细胞和祖细胞的直接体积流式细胞术定量。
目的:在这项研究中,我们比较了经典的单平台(SP)方法,使用珠珠计数CD45+或CD34+细胞与一种新的设备,允许直接测量干细胞和祖细胞的体积。背景:继单采和细胞保存后,CD34+细胞的精确计数作为移植物质量的关键参数是移植后临床过程的必要条件。目前,SP技术的流式细胞术代表了此类测定的“金标准”。方法/材料:采用流式细胞仪和直接体积流式细胞仪分别分析了14份来自活化外周血(PB)、9份来自分离产物(AP)和13份来自冻融(FT)造血祖细胞移植物的CD34+细胞、CD45+细胞和冻融样品的活力,其中14份来自活化外周血(PB), 9份来自冻融造血祖细胞移植物。结果:CD34+分析结果显示,两种技术之间各材料的相关系数r = 0.95 (PB), r = 0.933 (AP)和r = 0.929 (FT)显著(P < 0.01)。此外,对于CD45+细胞µL(-1)的分析,使用不同技术评估的测量数字对所有三种分析材料没有显着差异。在冻融样品中,两种技术的活力分析具有可比性。结论:本研究的结果表明,CD34+细胞µL(-1)或CD45+细胞µL(-1)的直接体积分析是可行的。这项技术代表了祖细胞和干细胞分析标准化的一种简单而经济的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信