Wake-up times following sedation with sevoflurane versus propofol after cardiac surgery.

Jan Hellström, Anders Öwall, Peter V Sackey
{"title":"Wake-up times following sedation with sevoflurane versus propofol after cardiac surgery.","authors":"Jan Hellström,&nbsp;Anders Öwall,&nbsp;Peter V Sackey","doi":"10.3109/14017431.2012.676209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intravenous sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may contribute to altered consciousness and prolonged mechanical ventilation. We tested the hypothesis that replacing intravenous propofol with inhaled sevoflurane for sedation after cardiac surgery would lead to shorter wake-up times, quicker patient cooperation, and less delusional memories.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Following coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, 100 patients were randomized to sedation with sevoflurane via the anesthetic conserving device or propofol. Study drugs were administered for a minimum of 2 hours until criteria for extubation were met. Primary endpoints were time from drug stop to extubation and to adequate verbal response. Secondary endpoints were adverse recovery events, memories reported in the ICU Memory Tool test, and ICU/hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time from drug stop to extubation (interquartile range/total range) was shorter after sevoflurane compared to propofol sedation; 10 (10/100) minutes versus 25 (21/240) minutes (p <0.001). Time from extubation to adequate verbal response was shorter (p =0.036). No differences were found in secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sevoflurane sedation after cardiac surgery leads to shorter wake-up times and quicker cooperation compared to propofol. No differences were seen in ICU-stay, adverse memories or recovery events in our short-term sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":137876,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","volume":" ","pages":"262-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14017431.2012.676209","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2012.676209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Objectives: Intravenous sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may contribute to altered consciousness and prolonged mechanical ventilation. We tested the hypothesis that replacing intravenous propofol with inhaled sevoflurane for sedation after cardiac surgery would lead to shorter wake-up times, quicker patient cooperation, and less delusional memories.

Design: Following coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, 100 patients were randomized to sedation with sevoflurane via the anesthetic conserving device or propofol. Study drugs were administered for a minimum of 2 hours until criteria for extubation were met. Primary endpoints were time from drug stop to extubation and to adequate verbal response. Secondary endpoints were adverse recovery events, memories reported in the ICU Memory Tool test, and ICU/hospital stay.

Results: Median time from drug stop to extubation (interquartile range/total range) was shorter after sevoflurane compared to propofol sedation; 10 (10/100) minutes versus 25 (21/240) minutes (p <0.001). Time from extubation to adequate verbal response was shorter (p =0.036). No differences were found in secondary endpoints.

Conclusions: Sevoflurane sedation after cardiac surgery leads to shorter wake-up times and quicker cooperation compared to propofol. No differences were seen in ICU-stay, adverse memories or recovery events in our short-term sedation.

心脏手术后七氟醚与异丙酚镇静后的唤醒时间。
目的:重症监护病房(ICU)静脉镇静可能导致意识改变和延长机械通气时间。我们验证了一个假设,即心脏手术后用吸入七氟醚代替静脉注射异丙酚镇静会缩短唤醒时间,加快患者的配合,减少妄想性记忆。设计:在冠状动脉搭桥手术合并体外循环后,100例患者随机分为七氟醚镇静组和异丙酚镇静组。研究药物给予至少2小时,直到达到拔管标准。主要终点是停药到拔管和足够的言语反应的时间。次要终点是不良恢复事件、ICU记忆工具测试中报告的记忆和ICU/住院时间。结果:与异丙酚镇静相比,七氟醚镇静从停药到拔管的中位时间(四分位数范围/总范围)更短;结论:与异丙酚相比,心脏手术后七氟醚镇静可缩短唤醒时间,加快配合。短期镇静在重症监护病房住院、不良记忆或恢复事件方面未见差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书