Primary care provider perceptions and use of a novel medication reconciliation technology.

Blake J Lesselroth, Patricia J Holahan, Kathleen Adams, Zhen Z Sullivan, Victoria L Church, Susan Woods, Robert Felder, Shawn Adams, David A Dorr
{"title":"Primary care provider perceptions and use of a novel medication reconciliation technology.","authors":"Blake J Lesselroth,&nbsp;Patricia J Holahan,&nbsp;Kathleen Adams,&nbsp;Zhen Z Sullivan,&nbsp;Victoria L Church,&nbsp;Susan Woods,&nbsp;Robert Felder,&nbsp;Shawn Adams,&nbsp;David A Dorr","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v19i2.802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although medication reconciliation (MR) can reduce medication discrepancies, it is challenging to operationalise. Consequently, we developed a health information technology (HIT) to collect a patient medication history and make it available to the primary care (PC) provider. We deployed a self-service kiosk in a PC clinic that permits patients to indicate a medication adherence history. Patient responses are immediately viewable in the legacy electronic health record. This paper describes a survey developed to assess PC provider perceptions of our HIT and HIT implementation effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and administered a survey to all PC providers to assess technology implementation effectiveness. The survey included scales measuring (1) user attitudes towards MR, (2) perceptions of our HIT and (3) the local organisational climate for implementation. We also assessed the consistency and quality of tool use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 90% of PC providers responded to the survey and 58% indicated that they were familiar with the technology and had seen the tool output. Most providers believed that MR represented an important safety intervention, although 43% did not believe that they had the necessary resources to manage discrepancies. Composite scale scores for the 58% of respondents familiar with the HIT indicate that the majority favoured our tool over usual care. However, composite scale scores suggest that the climate for implementation at our facility was suboptimal. Overall, the quality and consistency of tool use among providers was very heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A patient self-service kiosk offers an efficient mechanism to collect a medication adherence history; provider survey responses indicate that they appreciated and used the MR kiosk output. Nonetheless, opportunities exist to improve data displays and embed decision support to facilitate discrepancy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"19 2","pages":"105-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i2.802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: Although medication reconciliation (MR) can reduce medication discrepancies, it is challenging to operationalise. Consequently, we developed a health information technology (HIT) to collect a patient medication history and make it available to the primary care (PC) provider. We deployed a self-service kiosk in a PC clinic that permits patients to indicate a medication adherence history. Patient responses are immediately viewable in the legacy electronic health record. This paper describes a survey developed to assess PC provider perceptions of our HIT and HIT implementation effectiveness.

Methods: We developed and administered a survey to all PC providers to assess technology implementation effectiveness. The survey included scales measuring (1) user attitudes towards MR, (2) perceptions of our HIT and (3) the local organisational climate for implementation. We also assessed the consistency and quality of tool use.

Results: Nearly 90% of PC providers responded to the survey and 58% indicated that they were familiar with the technology and had seen the tool output. Most providers believed that MR represented an important safety intervention, although 43% did not believe that they had the necessary resources to manage discrepancies. Composite scale scores for the 58% of respondents familiar with the HIT indicate that the majority favoured our tool over usual care. However, composite scale scores suggest that the climate for implementation at our facility was suboptimal. Overall, the quality and consistency of tool use among providers was very heterogeneous.

Conclusions: A patient self-service kiosk offers an efficient mechanism to collect a medication adherence history; provider survey responses indicate that they appreciated and used the MR kiosk output. Nonetheless, opportunities exist to improve data displays and embed decision support to facilitate discrepancy management.

初级保健提供者的看法和使用一种新的药物和解技术。
背景:虽然药物和解(MR)可以减少药物差异,但操作起来具有挑战性。因此,我们开发了一种健康信息技术(HIT)来收集患者的用药历史,并将其提供给初级保健(PC)提供者。我们在个人电脑诊所部署了一个自助服务亭,允许患者指出药物依从史。在遗留的电子健康记录中可以立即看到患者的反应。本文描述了一项调查,旨在评估PC提供商对我们的HIT和HIT实施效果的看法。方法:我们开发并管理了一项针对所有PC供应商的调查,以评估技术实施的有效性。该调查包括测量(1)用户对MR的态度,(2)对我们的HIT的看法,以及(3)当地组织实施环境的量表。我们还评估了工具使用的一致性和质量。结果:近90%的PC供应商回应了调查,58%的人表示他们熟悉这项技术,并看到了工具的输出。大多数医疗服务提供者认为MR是一种重要的安全干预措施,尽管43%的人认为他们没有必要的资源来管理差异。58%熟悉HIT的受访者的综合量表得分表明,大多数人喜欢我们的工具而不是通常的护理。然而,综合量表得分表明,在我们的设施实施的气候是次优的。总的来说,提供者使用工具的质量和一致性是非常不一致的。结论:患者自助服务亭提供了收集药物依从史的有效机制;供应商调查结果表明,他们欣赏并使用了MR信息亭的输出。尽管如此,仍然存在改进数据显示和嵌入决策支持以促进差异管理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信