CD10+ and CK7/RON- immunophenotype distinguishes renal cell carcinoma, conventional type with eosinophilic morphology from its mimickers.

Saba Yasir, Loren Herrera, Carmen Gomez-Fernandez, Isildinha M Reis, Saleem Umar, Raymond Leveillee, Bruce Kava, Merce Jorda
{"title":"CD10+ and CK7/RON- immunophenotype distinguishes renal cell carcinoma, conventional type with eosinophilic morphology from its mimickers.","authors":"Saba Yasir,&nbsp;Loren Herrera,&nbsp;Carmen Gomez-Fernandez,&nbsp;Isildinha M Reis,&nbsp;Saleem Umar,&nbsp;Raymond Leveillee,&nbsp;Bruce Kava,&nbsp;Merce Jorda","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0b013e31823fecd3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The distinction between renal cell carcinoma conventional (clear cell) type with eosinophilic morphology (ccRCC), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma eosinophilic variant (chRCC), and renal oncocytoma (RO) is a common diagnostic dilemma. We aimed to identify an immunohistochemical panel to discriminate ccRCC from its morphologic mimics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-three renal neoplasms (19 ccRCC, 18 chRCC, and 16 RO) were selected. Immunohistochemical stains for CD10, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), c-Kit, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, kidney-specific cadherin (Ksp-cadherin), and Recepteur d'origine nantais (RON) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten (53%) of 19 ccRCC were positive for CD10, 11 (58%) for E-cadherin, 8 (42%) for N-cadherin, 5 (26%) for Ksp-cadherin, 9 (47%) for RON, 6 (32%) for CK7, and 5 (26%) for c-Kit. In chRCC/RO group, 5 of 34 (15%) were positive for CD10, 32 (94%) for E-cadherin, 2 (6%) for N-cadherin, 1 (3%) for Ksp-cadherin, 22 (65%) for RON, 14 (41%) for CK7, and 25 (25/32, 76%) for c-kit. Univariately, negative c-Kit [odds ratio (OR)=8.75, P=0.001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.747], negative E-cadherin (OR=11.64, P=0.005, AUC=0.681), positive N-cadherin (OR=11.64, P=0.005, AUC=0.681), positive Ksp-cadherin (OR=11.79, P=0.031, AUC=0.617), and positive CD10 (OR=6.44, P=0.005, AUC=0.690) detects ccRCC versus chRCC/RO. Multivariate analysis showed significant association between CD10 positivity and ccRCC (OR=16.90, P=0.007) and between RON negativity and ccRCC (OR=7.17, P=0.047) when CK7 is negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best single predictors for ccRCC are negative c-Kit, negative E-cadherin, positive N-cadherin, positive Ksp-cadherin, and positive CD10. However, considering the studied markers, a combination of positive CD10 and negative CK7 and RON is considered the best immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing ccRCC from chRCC/RO.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":"454-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PAI.0b013e31823fecd3","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0b013e31823fecd3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: The distinction between renal cell carcinoma conventional (clear cell) type with eosinophilic morphology (ccRCC), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma eosinophilic variant (chRCC), and renal oncocytoma (RO) is a common diagnostic dilemma. We aimed to identify an immunohistochemical panel to discriminate ccRCC from its morphologic mimics.

Materials and methods: Fifty-three renal neoplasms (19 ccRCC, 18 chRCC, and 16 RO) were selected. Immunohistochemical stains for CD10, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), c-Kit, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, kidney-specific cadherin (Ksp-cadherin), and Recepteur d'origine nantais (RON) were performed.

Results: Ten (53%) of 19 ccRCC were positive for CD10, 11 (58%) for E-cadherin, 8 (42%) for N-cadherin, 5 (26%) for Ksp-cadherin, 9 (47%) for RON, 6 (32%) for CK7, and 5 (26%) for c-Kit. In chRCC/RO group, 5 of 34 (15%) were positive for CD10, 32 (94%) for E-cadherin, 2 (6%) for N-cadherin, 1 (3%) for Ksp-cadherin, 22 (65%) for RON, 14 (41%) for CK7, and 25 (25/32, 76%) for c-kit. Univariately, negative c-Kit [odds ratio (OR)=8.75, P=0.001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.747], negative E-cadherin (OR=11.64, P=0.005, AUC=0.681), positive N-cadherin (OR=11.64, P=0.005, AUC=0.681), positive Ksp-cadherin (OR=11.79, P=0.031, AUC=0.617), and positive CD10 (OR=6.44, P=0.005, AUC=0.690) detects ccRCC versus chRCC/RO. Multivariate analysis showed significant association between CD10 positivity and ccRCC (OR=16.90, P=0.007) and between RON negativity and ccRCC (OR=7.17, P=0.047) when CK7 is negative.

Conclusions: The best single predictors for ccRCC are negative c-Kit, negative E-cadherin, positive N-cadherin, positive Ksp-cadherin, and positive CD10. However, considering the studied markers, a combination of positive CD10 and negative CK7 and RON is considered the best immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing ccRCC from chRCC/RO.

CD10+和CK7/RON-免疫表型可区分嗜酸性肾细胞癌和模拟肾细胞癌。
背景:区分嗜酸性粒细胞形态的常规(透明细胞)型肾细胞癌(ccRCC)、嗜酸性粒细胞变异型肾细胞癌(chRCC)和肾嗜酸性细胞瘤(RO)是一个常见的诊断难题。我们的目的是确定一个免疫组织化学小组来区分ccRCC和它的形态模拟。材料与方法:选择53例肾肿瘤(ccRCC 19例,chRCC 18例,RO 16例)。进行CD10、细胞角蛋白7 (CK7)、c-Kit、E-cadherin、N-cadherin、肾特异性cadherin (Ksp-cadherin)和原受体(RON)的免疫组化染色。结果:19例ccRCC中CD10阳性10例(53%),E-cadherin阳性11例(58%),N-cadherin阳性8例(42%),Ksp-cadherin阳性5例(26%),RON阳性9例(47%),CK7阳性6例(32%),c-Kit阳性5例(26%)。在chRCC/RO组中,34例CD10阳性5例(15%),E-cadherin阳性32例(94%),N-cadherin阳性2例(6%),Ksp-cadherin阳性1例(3%),RON阳性22例(65%),CK7阳性14例(41%),c-kit阳性25例(25/ 32,76%)。单因素方面,c-Kit阴性[优势比(OR)=8.75, P=0.001,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)=0.747]、E-cadherin阴性(OR=11.64, P=0.005, AUC=0.681)、N-cadherin阳性(OR=11.64, P=0.005, AUC=0.681)、kkp -cadherin阳性(OR=11.79, P=0.031, AUC=0.617)和CD10阳性(OR=6.44, P=0.005, AUC=0.690)检测ccRCC与chRCC/RO。多因素分析显示,CD10阳性与ccRCC呈显著相关(OR=16.90, P=0.007), CK7阴性时RON阴性与ccRCC呈显著相关(OR=7.17, P=0.047)。结论:ccRCC的最佳单一预测因子为c-Kit阴性、E-cadherin阴性、N-cadherin阳性、Ksp-cadherin阳性和CD10阳性。然而,考虑到所研究的标志物,CD10阳性、CK7阴性和RON的组合被认为是区分ccRCC和chRCC/RO的最佳免疫组化面板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信