Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment.

Veterinary surgery : VS Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1111/vsu.13840
Nausikaa Devriendt, Dominique Paepe, Gonçalo Serrano, Hilde de Rooster
{"title":"Evaluation of different blood tests in dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts to assess shunt closure after surgical treatment.","authors":"Nausikaa Devriendt,&nbsp;Dominique Paepe,&nbsp;Gonçalo Serrano,&nbsp;Hilde de Rooster","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the sensitivity and specificity of different individual and combined blood tests to assess extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS) closure after gradual attenuation of EHPSS in dogs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Clinical prospective study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty client-owned dogs with EHPSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fasting ammonia (FA), preprandial, postprandial, and paired serum bile acids (SBA), the lidocaine/monoethylglycylxylidide (L/MEGX) test, and serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) were performed at diagnosis, and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Transsplenic portal scintigraphy was performed to determine EHPSS closure 3 months postoperatively. Their sensitivity and specificity in determining shunt closure postoperatively were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessing a single blood parameter, FA had the highest specificity (100%), whereas SHA and MEGX measured 15 min after lidocaine administration (T15) had the highest sensitivity (96.9% and 96.2%, respectively) for determining shunt closure postoperatively. The most promising blood test combinations were SHA (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%), combined with the L/MEGX test (MEGX at T15: sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.4%) or the L/MEGX test (MEGX at T15) combined with either FA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 82.8%) or postprandial SBA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 81.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SHA and the L/MEGX test were sensitive tests for determining shunt closure after gradual attenuation of EHPSS. Test performances could even be improved by combining these tests with each other or with traditional tests such as FA or postprandial SBA.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Although SHA and the L/MEGX test are sensitive blood tests for determining EHPSS closure, especially when combined with traditional blood tests, imaging is still needed to confirm EHPSS closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":" ","pages":"1142-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of different individual and combined blood tests to assess extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS) closure after gradual attenuation of EHPSS in dogs.

Study design: Clinical prospective study.

Animals: Twenty client-owned dogs with EHPSS.

Methods: Fasting ammonia (FA), preprandial, postprandial, and paired serum bile acids (SBA), the lidocaine/monoethylglycylxylidide (L/MEGX) test, and serum hyaluronic acid (SHA) were performed at diagnosis, and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Transsplenic portal scintigraphy was performed to determine EHPSS closure 3 months postoperatively. Their sensitivity and specificity in determining shunt closure postoperatively were calculated.

Results: When assessing a single blood parameter, FA had the highest specificity (100%), whereas SHA and MEGX measured 15 min after lidocaine administration (T15) had the highest sensitivity (96.9% and 96.2%, respectively) for determining shunt closure postoperatively. The most promising blood test combinations were SHA (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%), combined with the L/MEGX test (MEGX at T15: sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.4%) or the L/MEGX test (MEGX at T15) combined with either FA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 82.8%) or postprandial SBA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 81.5%).

Conclusion: Both SHA and the L/MEGX test were sensitive tests for determining shunt closure after gradual attenuation of EHPSS. Test performances could even be improved by combining these tests with each other or with traditional tests such as FA or postprandial SBA.

Clinical significance: Although SHA and the L/MEGX test are sensitive blood tests for determining EHPSS closure, especially when combined with traditional blood tests, imaging is still needed to confirm EHPSS closure.

评估肝外门系统分流犬的不同血液检查以评估手术治疗后分流关闭。
目的:探讨犬肝外门静脉系统分流(EHPSS)逐渐衰减后,不同单项及联合血液检查评估其关闭的敏感性和特异性。研究设计:临床前瞻性研究。动物:20只客户拥有的EHPSS狗。方法:在诊断时及术后1、3、6个月分别进行空腹氨(FA)、餐前、餐后、配对血清胆汁酸(SBA)、利多卡因/单乙基甘酰基脂(L/MEGX)试验、血清透明质酸(SHA)测定。术后3个月行经脾门静脉显像测定EHPSS闭合情况。计算其在判断术后分流关闭的敏感性和特异性。结果:在评估单个血液参数时,FA具有最高的特异性(100%),而在利多卡因给药后15分钟(T15)测量的SHA和MEGX具有最高的敏感性(分别为96.9%和96.2%)。最有希望的血液检测组合是SHA(灵敏度96.9%,特异性81.8%)联合L/MEGX检测(T15时MEGX:灵敏度100%,特异性72.4%)或L/MEGX检测(T15时MEGX)联合FA(灵敏度100%,特异性82.8%)或餐后SBA(灵敏度100%,特异性81.5%)。结论:SHA和L/MEGX试验是判断EHPSS逐渐衰减后分流闭合的灵敏试验。甚至可以通过将这些测试相互结合或与传统测试(如FA或餐后SBA)相结合来提高测试性能。临床意义:虽然SHA和L/MEGX试验是判断EHPSS闭合的敏感血液检查,特别是与传统血液检查结合使用时,仍需要影像学检查来确认EHPSS闭合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信