Community-based, interdisciplinary geriatric care team satisfaction with an electronic health record: a multimethod study.

IF 1.9
Paulina S Sockolow, Kathryn H Bowles, Harold P Lehmann, Patricia A Abbott, Jonathan P Weiner
{"title":"Community-based, interdisciplinary geriatric care team satisfaction with an electronic health record: a multimethod study.","authors":"Paulina S Sockolow,&nbsp;Kathryn H Bowles,&nbsp;Harold P Lehmann,&nbsp;Patricia A Abbott,&nbsp;Jonathan P Weiner","doi":"10.1097/NCN.0b013e31823eb561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This multimethod study measured the impact of an electronic health record (EHR) on clinician satisfaction with clinical process. Subjects were 39 clinicians at a Program of All-inclusive Care for Elders (PACE) site in Philadelphia utilizing an EHR. Methods included the evidence-based evaluation framework, Health Information Technology Research-Based Evaluation Framework, which guided assessment of clinician satisfaction with surveys, observations, follow-up interviews, and actual EHR use at two points in time. Mixed-methods analysis of findings provided context for interpretation and improved validity. The study found that clinicians were satisfied with the EHR; however, satisfaction declined between time periods. Use of EHR was universal and wide and was differentiated by clinical role. Between time periods, EHR use increased in volume, with increased timeliness and decreased efficiency. As the first EHR evaluation at a PACE site from the perspective of clinicians who use the system, this study provides insights into EHR use in the care of older people in community-based healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":"300-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NCN.0b013e31823eb561","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCN.0b013e31823eb561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This multimethod study measured the impact of an electronic health record (EHR) on clinician satisfaction with clinical process. Subjects were 39 clinicians at a Program of All-inclusive Care for Elders (PACE) site in Philadelphia utilizing an EHR. Methods included the evidence-based evaluation framework, Health Information Technology Research-Based Evaluation Framework, which guided assessment of clinician satisfaction with surveys, observations, follow-up interviews, and actual EHR use at two points in time. Mixed-methods analysis of findings provided context for interpretation and improved validity. The study found that clinicians were satisfied with the EHR; however, satisfaction declined between time periods. Use of EHR was universal and wide and was differentiated by clinical role. Between time periods, EHR use increased in volume, with increased timeliness and decreased efficiency. As the first EHR evaluation at a PACE site from the perspective of clinicians who use the system, this study provides insights into EHR use in the care of older people in community-based healthcare settings.

基于社区、跨学科的老年护理团队对电子健康记录的满意度:一项多方法研究。
这项多方法研究测量了电子健康记录(EHR)对临床医生对临床过程满意度的影响。研究对象是39名临床医生,他们在费城的一个老年人全包护理项目(PACE)使用电子病历。方法采用循证评价框架、基于卫生信息技术研究的评价框架,通过调查、观察、随访访谈和两个时间点的实际电子病历使用情况来指导临床医生满意度评价。混合方法分析结果为解释和提高有效性提供了背景。研究发现,临床医生对电子病历感到满意;然而,满意度在不同时期有所下降。电子病历的使用是普遍和广泛的,并根据临床角色进行区分。在不同时间段之间,电子病历的使用量增加,时效性增加,效率降低。作为第一个从使用该系统的临床医生的角度在PACE站点进行的电子病历评估,本研究提供了对社区医疗保健机构中老年人护理中电子病历使用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信