Predicting Future PTSD using a Modified New York Risk Score: Implications for Patient Screening and Management.

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine
Minerva Psichiatrica Pub Date : 2012-03-01
Joseph A Boscarino, H Lester Kirchner, Stuart N Hoffman, Jennifer Sartorius, Richard E Adams, Charles R Figley
{"title":"Predicting Future PTSD using a Modified New York Risk Score: Implications for Patient Screening and Management.","authors":"Joseph A Boscarino,&nbsp;H Lester Kirchner,&nbsp;Stuart N Hoffman,&nbsp;Jennifer Sartorius,&nbsp;Richard E Adams,&nbsp;Charles R Figley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AIM: We previously developed a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening instrument - the New York PTSD Risk Score - that was effective in predicting PTSD. In the present study, we assessed a 12-month prospective version of this risk score, which is important for patient management, follow-up, and for emergency medicine. METHODS: Using data collected in a study of New York City adults after the World Trade Center Disaster (WTCD), we developed a new PTSD prediction tool. Using diagnostic test methods, including receiver operating curve (ROC) and bootstrap procedures, we examined different prediction variables to assess PTSD status 12 months after initial assessment among 1,681 trauma-exposed adults. RESULTS: While our original PTSD screener worked well in the short term, it was not specifically developed to predict long-term PTSD. In the current study, we found that the Primary Care PTSD Screener (PCPS), when combined with psychosocial predictors from the original NY Risk Score, including depression, trauma exposure, sleep disturbance, and healthcare access, increased the area under the ROC curve (AUC) from 0.707 to 0.774, a significant improvement (p<0.0001). When additional risk-factor variables were added, including negative life events, handedness, self-esteem, and pain status, the AUC increased to 0.819, also a significant improvement (p=0.001). Adding Latino and foreign status to the model further increased the AUC to 0.839 (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: A prospective version of the New York PTSD Risk Score appears to be effective in predicting PTSD status 12 months after initial assessment among trauma-exposed adults. Further research is advised to further validate and expand these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":42192,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Psichiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298362/pdf/nihms358481.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Psichiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: We previously developed a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening instrument - the New York PTSD Risk Score - that was effective in predicting PTSD. In the present study, we assessed a 12-month prospective version of this risk score, which is important for patient management, follow-up, and for emergency medicine. METHODS: Using data collected in a study of New York City adults after the World Trade Center Disaster (WTCD), we developed a new PTSD prediction tool. Using diagnostic test methods, including receiver operating curve (ROC) and bootstrap procedures, we examined different prediction variables to assess PTSD status 12 months after initial assessment among 1,681 trauma-exposed adults. RESULTS: While our original PTSD screener worked well in the short term, it was not specifically developed to predict long-term PTSD. In the current study, we found that the Primary Care PTSD Screener (PCPS), when combined with psychosocial predictors from the original NY Risk Score, including depression, trauma exposure, sleep disturbance, and healthcare access, increased the area under the ROC curve (AUC) from 0.707 to 0.774, a significant improvement (p<0.0001). When additional risk-factor variables were added, including negative life events, handedness, self-esteem, and pain status, the AUC increased to 0.819, also a significant improvement (p=0.001). Adding Latino and foreign status to the model further increased the AUC to 0.839 (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: A prospective version of the New York PTSD Risk Score appears to be effective in predicting PTSD status 12 months after initial assessment among trauma-exposed adults. Further research is advised to further validate and expand these findings.

使用改良的纽约风险评分预测未来创伤后应激障碍:对患者筛选和管理的意义。
目的:我们之前开发了一种创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查工具-纽约PTSD风险评分-有效预测PTSD。在本研究中,我们评估了该风险评分的12个月前瞻性版本,这对患者管理、随访和急诊医学很重要。方法:利用世界贸易中心灾难(WTCD)后纽约市成年人的研究数据,我们开发了一种新的创伤后应激障碍预测工具。使用诊断测试方法,包括受试者工作曲线(ROC)和自举程序,我们检查了1,681名创伤暴露成人在初次评估后12个月的PTSD状态的不同预测变量。结果:虽然我们最初的PTSD筛查在短期内效果良好,但它并不是专门用于预测长期PTSD的。在目前的研究中,我们发现初级保健PTSD筛查(pps),当与来自原始NY风险评分的心理社会预测因子(包括抑郁、创伤暴露、睡眠障碍和医疗保健获取)相结合时,将ROC曲线下的面积(AUC)从0.707增加到0.774,显着改善(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Psichiatrica
Minerva Psichiatrica PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Psichiatrica publishes scientific papers on psychiatry, psycology and psycopharmacology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信