Validity of the diagnoses atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a Danish patient registry.

Thomas Andersen Rix, Sam Riahi, Kim Overvad, Søren Lundbye-Christensen, Erik Berg Schmidt, Albert Marni Joensen
{"title":"Validity of the diagnoses atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a Danish patient registry.","authors":"Thomas Andersen Rix,&nbsp;Sam Riahi,&nbsp;Kim Overvad,&nbsp;Søren Lundbye-Christensen,&nbsp;Erik Berg Schmidt,&nbsp;Albert Marni Joensen","doi":"10.3109/14017431.2012.673728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the validity of the diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) for men and women recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry, and to assess the relative distribution of AF and AFL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Review of medical records for incident cases of AF and/or AFL in the Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort study. Participants were enrolled in 1993-97 with 13.6 years of follow-up until 30 December, 2009.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive predictive value of the combined diagnosis of AF and/or AFL was 92.6% (95% CI 88.8%; 95.2%) with no significant difference between sexes (men 93.7% (133/142), women 90.8% (129/142)). The proportion of AFL either alone or in combination with AF was significantly higher in men than in women (13.5% (18/133) vs. 5.4% (7/129), p =0.03). The positive predictive value of the specified diagnosis of AFL was 57.5% for men (46/80) and 29.6% for women (8/27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the validity of the diagnosis of AF and/or AFL is high and may be used for registry-based studies. A specified diagnosis of AFL was rarely used and was not reliable to distinguish between cases of AF and AFL.</p>","PeriodicalId":137876,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","volume":" ","pages":"149-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14017431.2012.673728","citationCount":"190","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2012.673728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 190

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the validity of the diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) for men and women recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry, and to assess the relative distribution of AF and AFL.

Design: Review of medical records for incident cases of AF and/or AFL in the Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort study. Participants were enrolled in 1993-97 with 13.6 years of follow-up until 30 December, 2009.

Results: The positive predictive value of the combined diagnosis of AF and/or AFL was 92.6% (95% CI 88.8%; 95.2%) with no significant difference between sexes (men 93.7% (133/142), women 90.8% (129/142)). The proportion of AFL either alone or in combination with AF was significantly higher in men than in women (13.5% (18/133) vs. 5.4% (7/129), p =0.03). The positive predictive value of the specified diagnosis of AFL was 57.5% for men (46/80) and 29.6% for women (8/27).

Conclusions: This study shows that the validity of the diagnosis of AF and/or AFL is high and may be used for registry-based studies. A specified diagnosis of AFL was rarely used and was not reliable to distinguish between cases of AF and AFL.

丹麦患者登记房颤和心房扑动诊断的有效性。
目的:评估丹麦国家患者登记处记录的男性和女性房颤(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)诊断的有效性,并评估AF和AFL的相对分布。设计:回顾饮食、癌症和健康队列研究中AF和/或AFL事件病例的医疗记录。参与者于1993- 1997年入组,随访13.6年,至2009年12月30日。结果:AF和/或AFL联合诊断的阳性预测值为92.6% (95% CI 88.8%;95.2%),性别差异无统计学意义(男性93.7%(133/142),女性90.8%(129/142))。男性AFL单独或合并AF的比例明显高于女性(13.5%(18/133)比5.4% (7/129),p =0.03)。AFL特异性诊断阳性预测值男性为57.5%(46/80),女性为29.6%(8/27)。结论:本研究表明AF和/或AFL诊断的有效性很高,可用于基于登记的研究。AFL的特定诊断很少被使用,并且不能可靠地区分AF和AFL病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书