{"title":"Angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism is not associated with type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population.","authors":"Donghao Zhou, Rikje Ruiter, Jingling Zhang, Ming'ai Zhou, Hongjun Liu, Weidong Liu, Shengxiang Wang","doi":"10.1177/1470320311435535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A role for the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been suggested in the aetiology of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, results have been inconsistent. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Wan Fang Data were searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: A total of 41 studies (4708 cases and 5368 controls) for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM in a Chinese population were identified. The pooled ORs for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk were not statistically significant under all genetic models (co-dominant model: DD vs. II: OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.42 and ID vs. II: OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10; dominant model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19; multiplicative model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.18). Although a marginally significant association was observed under a recessive model (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), robustness of this estimate could not be established under additional sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: The meta-analysis presented in this study indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism may not be associated with the risk of T2DM in the Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS","volume":" ","pages":"372-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320311435535","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320311435535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Abstract
Objective: A role for the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been suggested in the aetiology of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, results have been inconsistent. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk in a Chinese population.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Wan Fang Data were searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model.
Results: : A total of 41 studies (4708 cases and 5368 controls) for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM in a Chinese population were identified. The pooled ORs for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk were not statistically significant under all genetic models (co-dominant model: DD vs. II: OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.42 and ID vs. II: OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10; dominant model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19; multiplicative model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.18). Although a marginally significant association was observed under a recessive model (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), robustness of this estimate could not be established under additional sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: : The meta-analysis presented in this study indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism may not be associated with the risk of T2DM in the Chinese population.
目的:血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因在2型糖尿病(T2DM)发病中的作用。然而,结果并不一致。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以进一步阐明中国人群中ACE I/D多态性与2型糖尿病风险之间的关系。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、CNKI和万方数据。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并优势比(ORs)。结果:共有41项研究(4708例病例和5368例对照)在中国人群中确定了ACE I/D多态性与T2DM之间的关系。在所有遗传模型下,ACE I/D多态性与T2DM风险相关性的合并OR值均无统计学意义(共显性模型:DD vs. II: OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.42, ID vs. II: OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10;优势模型:OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19;乘法模型:OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.18)。虽然在隐性模型下观察到边际显著的关联(OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36),但在额外的敏感性分析下无法建立这一估计的稳健性。结论:本研究的荟萃分析表明,ACE I/D多态性可能与中国人群中2型糖尿病的风险无关。