The HSE indicator tool, psychological distress and work ability.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2012-04-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-06 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqs021
S Guidi, S Bagnara, G P Fichera
{"title":"The HSE indicator tool, psychological distress and work ability.","authors":"S Guidi,&nbsp;S Bagnara,&nbsp;G P Fichera","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqs021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) indicator tool is one of the most commonly used tools for assessing the risk of work-related stress. Few studies, however, have investigated whether and how its scales are related to psychological distress or other work-related health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the relationship between the HSE indicator tool, psychological distress, as measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12, and work ability, assessed by the Work Ability Index (WAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All the employees of a mid-sized bank in Italy were asked to fill in an anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire. The questionnaire was structured in four sections: the first one comprised socio-demographic questions and the other three corresponded, respectively, to the Italian translations of the GHQ-12, the HSE and the WAI questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and thirteen employees completed the questionnaire. The response rate was 99%. Controlling for age and gender, the indicator subscales were negatively associated with the adopted measures of psychological distress and work ability. The GHQ score was also highly correlated with the WAI score and able to explain ≈ 47% of its variance. The only subscale that was still significantly associated with the WAI after removing the effect of psychological distress was 'control'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study presents new evidence for the validity of the HSE indicator tool to estimate the risk of work-related stress and suggests that most but not all the effects of psychosocial conditions on work ability might be mediated by the level of psychological distress induced by these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"203-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs021","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Background: The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) indicator tool is one of the most commonly used tools for assessing the risk of work-related stress. Few studies, however, have investigated whether and how its scales are related to psychological distress or other work-related health outcomes.

Aims: To investigate the relationship between the HSE indicator tool, psychological distress, as measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12, and work ability, assessed by the Work Ability Index (WAI).

Methods: All the employees of a mid-sized bank in Italy were asked to fill in an anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire. The questionnaire was structured in four sections: the first one comprised socio-demographic questions and the other three corresponded, respectively, to the Italian translations of the GHQ-12, the HSE and the WAI questionnaires.

Results: Four hundred and thirteen employees completed the questionnaire. The response rate was 99%. Controlling for age and gender, the indicator subscales were negatively associated with the adopted measures of psychological distress and work ability. The GHQ score was also highly correlated with the WAI score and able to explain ≈ 47% of its variance. The only subscale that was still significantly associated with the WAI after removing the effect of psychological distress was 'control'.

Conclusions: The study presents new evidence for the validity of the HSE indicator tool to estimate the risk of work-related stress and suggests that most but not all the effects of psychosocial conditions on work ability might be mediated by the level of psychological distress induced by these conditions.

HSE指标工具、心理困扰和工作能力。
背景:健康与安全执行(HSE)指标工具是评估工作压力风险最常用的工具之一。然而,很少有研究调查其量表是否以及如何与心理困扰或其他与工作相关的健康结果相关。目的:探讨HSE指标工具——一般健康问卷(GHQ)-12测量的心理困扰与工作能力指数(WAI)评估的工作能力之间的关系。方法:要求意大利一家中型银行的所有员工填写一份匿名横断面问卷。问卷分为四个部分:第一部分包括社会人口问题,其他三个部分分别对应于GHQ-12、HSE和WAI问卷的意大利语翻译。结果:共有413名员工完成了问卷调查。应答率为99%。控制年龄和性别,指标分量表与所采用的心理困扰和工作能力的测量负相关。GHQ评分也与WAI评分高度相关,能够解释其方差的约47%。在去除心理困扰的影响后,唯一与WAI显著相关的子量表是“控制”。结论:本研究为评估工作压力风险的HSE指标工具的有效性提供了新的证据,并表明大多数(但不是全部)社会心理状况对工作能力的影响可能是由这些状况引起的心理困扰水平介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信