Characteristics of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in New Zealand: a survey of practice prior to and during COVID-19.

The New Zealand medical journal Pub Date : 2022-02-25
Sarah Candy, Julie Reeve, Rosie Dobson, Denise Taylor
{"title":"Characteristics of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in New Zealand: a survey of practice prior to and during COVID-19.","authors":"Sarah Candy,&nbsp;Julie Reeve,&nbsp;Rosie Dobson,&nbsp;Denise Taylor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this survey was to develop an understanding of current pulmonary rehabilitation practices in New Zealand. The onset of a COVID-19 lockdown in New Zealand in March 2020, shortly after completion of the initial survey, enabled a follow-up survey to determine how services had adapted in response to the global pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational design using two sequential purpose designed online surveys administered before (Survey 1) and after COVID-19 lockdowns (Survey 2) in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey 1 was completed by 36 PR services across New Zealand and showed homogeneity in the content and structure of services provided. PR was primarily funded by district health boards, run by a multi-disciplinary team of health professionals and included participants with a range of chronic respiratory conditions. All programmes completed pre- and post-PR assessments, were a minimum of eight weeks in duration and included exercise and education. Survey 2 showed that, during level 4 and level 3 COVID-19 restrictions, 11 (40.7%) of services paused PR programmes, with 16 (59%) adapting the service to provide home-based rehabilitation via telephone or teleconference facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PR programmes in New Zealand report following Australian and New Zealand PR best practice guidelines and are homogenous in content and structure, but COVID-19 restrictions highlighted the need for services to provide more diverse options for service delivery. Future service development should focus on providing a range of delivery options allowing increased access to PR, tailoring therapy to meet individual needs and ensuring services are engaging for all participants to optimise participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":160836,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand medical journal","volume":" ","pages":"13-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The primary aim of this survey was to develop an understanding of current pulmonary rehabilitation practices in New Zealand. The onset of a COVID-19 lockdown in New Zealand in March 2020, shortly after completion of the initial survey, enabled a follow-up survey to determine how services had adapted in response to the global pandemic.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational design using two sequential purpose designed online surveys administered before (Survey 1) and after COVID-19 lockdowns (Survey 2) in New Zealand.

Results: Survey 1 was completed by 36 PR services across New Zealand and showed homogeneity in the content and structure of services provided. PR was primarily funded by district health boards, run by a multi-disciplinary team of health professionals and included participants with a range of chronic respiratory conditions. All programmes completed pre- and post-PR assessments, were a minimum of eight weeks in duration and included exercise and education. Survey 2 showed that, during level 4 and level 3 COVID-19 restrictions, 11 (40.7%) of services paused PR programmes, with 16 (59%) adapting the service to provide home-based rehabilitation via telephone or teleconference facilities.

Conclusion: PR programmes in New Zealand report following Australian and New Zealand PR best practice guidelines and are homogenous in content and structure, but COVID-19 restrictions highlighted the need for services to provide more diverse options for service delivery. Future service development should focus on providing a range of delivery options allowing increased access to PR, tailoring therapy to meet individual needs and ensuring services are engaging for all participants to optimise participation.

新西兰肺康复规划的特点:COVID-19之前和期间的实践调查
目的:本调查的主要目的是了解当前新西兰的肺康复实践。在初步调查完成后不久,新西兰于2020年3月开始实施COVID-19封锁,从而进行了后续调查,以确定服务如何适应全球大流行。方法:采用横断面观察设计,在新西兰COVID-19封锁之前(调查1)和之后(调查2)进行两次顺序目的设计的在线调查。结果:调查1是由新西兰的36家公关服务机构完成的,显示了所提供服务的内容和结构的同质性。公共关系主要由地区卫生委员会资助,由一个多学科的卫生专业人员小组管理,包括患有各种慢性呼吸系统疾病的参与者。所有项目都完成了公关前和公关后的评估,持续时间至少为8周,包括锻炼和教育。调查2显示,在COVID-19第4级和第3级限制期间,11家(40.7%)服务机构暂停了公关计划,16家(59%)调整了服务,通过电话或电话会议设施提供家庭康复服务。结论:新西兰的公关方案遵循澳大利亚和新西兰的公关最佳实践指南,在内容和结构上同质化,但2019冠状病毒病的限制突出表明,服务部门需要提供更多样化的服务提供选择。未来的服务发展应侧重于提供一系列的交付选择,允许更多的人获得公共关系,定制治疗以满足个人需求,并确保服务吸引所有参与者,以优化参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书