The kappa free light chain index and oligoclonal bands have a similar role in the McDonald criteria.

Georgina Arrambide, Carmen Espejo, Pere Carbonell-Mirabent, Romina Dieli-Crimi, Marta Rodríguez-Barranco, Mireia Castillo, Cristina Auger, Simón Cárdenas-Robledo, Joaquín Castilló, Álvaro Cobo-Calvo, Ingrid Galán, Luciana Midaglia, Carlos Nos, Susana Otero-Romero, Jordi Río, Breogán Rodríguez-Acevedo, Mariano Ruiz-Ortiz, Annalaura Salerno, Paula Tagliani, Carmen Tur, Angela Vidal-Jordana, Ana Zabalza, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Alex Rovira, Manuel Comabella, Manuel Hernández-González, Xavier Montalban, Mar Tintore
{"title":"The kappa free light chain index and oligoclonal bands have a similar role in the McDonald criteria.","authors":"Georgina Arrambide,&nbsp;Carmen Espejo,&nbsp;Pere Carbonell-Mirabent,&nbsp;Romina Dieli-Crimi,&nbsp;Marta Rodríguez-Barranco,&nbsp;Mireia Castillo,&nbsp;Cristina Auger,&nbsp;Simón Cárdenas-Robledo,&nbsp;Joaquín Castilló,&nbsp;Álvaro Cobo-Calvo,&nbsp;Ingrid Galán,&nbsp;Luciana Midaglia,&nbsp;Carlos Nos,&nbsp;Susana Otero-Romero,&nbsp;Jordi Río,&nbsp;Breogán Rodríguez-Acevedo,&nbsp;Mariano Ruiz-Ortiz,&nbsp;Annalaura Salerno,&nbsp;Paula Tagliani,&nbsp;Carmen Tur,&nbsp;Angela Vidal-Jordana,&nbsp;Ana Zabalza,&nbsp;Jaume Sastre-Garriga,&nbsp;Alex Rovira,&nbsp;Manuel Comabella,&nbsp;Manuel Hernández-González,&nbsp;Xavier Montalban,&nbsp;Mar Tintore","doi":"10.1093/brain/awac220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intrathecal production of kappa free light chains occurs in multiple sclerosis and can be measured using the kappa free light chain index. Kappa free light chain index values can be determined more easily than oligoclonal bands detection and seem more sensitive than the immunoglobulin (Ig)G index to diagnose multiple sclerosis. We assessed the value of oligoclonal bands, kappa free light chain index cut-offs 5.9, 6.6 and 10.61, and IgG index to diagnose multiple sclerosis with prospectively acquired data from a clinically isolated syndrome inception cohort. We selected patients with sufficient data to determine oligoclonal bands positivity, MRI dissemination in space and time, IgG index and sufficient quantities of paired CSF and blood samples to determine kappa free light chain indexes (n = 214). We used Kendall's Tau coefficient to estimate concordance, calculated the number of additional diagnoses when adding each positive index to dissemination in space and positive oligoclonal bands, performed survival analyses for oligoclonal bands and each index with the outcomes second attack and 2017 MRI dissemination in space and time and estimated the diagnostic properties of oligoclonal bands and the different indexes for the previously mentioned outcomes at 5 years. Oligoclonal bands were positive in 138 patients (64.5%), kappa free light chain-5.9 in 136 (63.6%), kappa free light chain-6.6 in 135 (63.1%), kappa free light chain-10.61 in 126 (58.9%) and IgG index in 101 (47.2%). The highest concordance was between oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chain-6.6 (τ = 0.727) followed by oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chain-5.9 (τ = 0.716). Combining dissemination in space plus oligoclonal bands or kappa free light chain-5.9 increased the number of diagnosed patients by 11 (5.1%), with kappa free light chain-6.6 by 10 (4.7%), with kappa free light chain-10.61 by 9 (4.2%) and with IgG index by 3 (1.4%). Patients with positive oligoclonal bands or indexes reached second attack and MRI dissemination in space and time faster than patients with negative results (P < 0.0001 except IgG index in second attack: P = 0.016). In multivariable Cox models [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)], the risk for second attack was very similar between kappa free light chain-5.9 [2.0 (0.9-4.3), P = 0.068] and kappa free light chain-6.6 [2.1 (1.1-4.2), P = 0.035]. The highest risk for MRI dissemination in space and time was demonstrated with kappa free light chain-5.9 [4.9 (2.5-9.6), P < 0.0001], followed by kappa free light chain-6.6 [3.4 (1.9-6.3), P < 0.0001]. Kappa free light chains-5.9 and -6.6 had a slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than oligoclonal bands for second attack (70.5, 71.1 and 67.8) and MRI dissemination in space and time (85.7, 85.1 and 81.0). Kappa free light chain indexes 5.9 and 6.6 performed slightly better than oligoclonal bands to assess multiple sclerosis risk and in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Given the concordance between oligoclonal bands and these indexes, we suggest using dissemination in space plus positive oligoclonal bands or positive kappa free light chain index as a modified criterion to diagnose multiple sclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":121505,"journal":{"name":"Brain : a journal of neurology","volume":" ","pages":"3931-3942"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain : a journal of neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Intrathecal production of kappa free light chains occurs in multiple sclerosis and can be measured using the kappa free light chain index. Kappa free light chain index values can be determined more easily than oligoclonal bands detection and seem more sensitive than the immunoglobulin (Ig)G index to diagnose multiple sclerosis. We assessed the value of oligoclonal bands, kappa free light chain index cut-offs 5.9, 6.6 and 10.61, and IgG index to diagnose multiple sclerosis with prospectively acquired data from a clinically isolated syndrome inception cohort. We selected patients with sufficient data to determine oligoclonal bands positivity, MRI dissemination in space and time, IgG index and sufficient quantities of paired CSF and blood samples to determine kappa free light chain indexes (n = 214). We used Kendall's Tau coefficient to estimate concordance, calculated the number of additional diagnoses when adding each positive index to dissemination in space and positive oligoclonal bands, performed survival analyses for oligoclonal bands and each index with the outcomes second attack and 2017 MRI dissemination in space and time and estimated the diagnostic properties of oligoclonal bands and the different indexes for the previously mentioned outcomes at 5 years. Oligoclonal bands were positive in 138 patients (64.5%), kappa free light chain-5.9 in 136 (63.6%), kappa free light chain-6.6 in 135 (63.1%), kappa free light chain-10.61 in 126 (58.9%) and IgG index in 101 (47.2%). The highest concordance was between oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chain-6.6 (τ = 0.727) followed by oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chain-5.9 (τ = 0.716). Combining dissemination in space plus oligoclonal bands or kappa free light chain-5.9 increased the number of diagnosed patients by 11 (5.1%), with kappa free light chain-6.6 by 10 (4.7%), with kappa free light chain-10.61 by 9 (4.2%) and with IgG index by 3 (1.4%). Patients with positive oligoclonal bands or indexes reached second attack and MRI dissemination in space and time faster than patients with negative results (P < 0.0001 except IgG index in second attack: P = 0.016). In multivariable Cox models [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)], the risk for second attack was very similar between kappa free light chain-5.9 [2.0 (0.9-4.3), P = 0.068] and kappa free light chain-6.6 [2.1 (1.1-4.2), P = 0.035]. The highest risk for MRI dissemination in space and time was demonstrated with kappa free light chain-5.9 [4.9 (2.5-9.6), P < 0.0001], followed by kappa free light chain-6.6 [3.4 (1.9-6.3), P < 0.0001]. Kappa free light chains-5.9 and -6.6 had a slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than oligoclonal bands for second attack (70.5, 71.1 and 67.8) and MRI dissemination in space and time (85.7, 85.1 and 81.0). Kappa free light chain indexes 5.9 and 6.6 performed slightly better than oligoclonal bands to assess multiple sclerosis risk and in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Given the concordance between oligoclonal bands and these indexes, we suggest using dissemination in space plus positive oligoclonal bands or positive kappa free light chain index as a modified criterion to diagnose multiple sclerosis.

kappa自由轻链指数和寡克隆带在McDonald标准中具有相似的作用。
鞘内游离轻链产生于多发性硬化症,可用游离轻链指数测量。Kappa游离轻链指数值比寡克隆带检测更容易确定,比免疫球蛋白(Ig)G指数对多发性硬化的诊断更敏感。我们评估了寡克隆条带、kappa自由轻链指数临界值5.9、6.6和10.61以及IgG指数在诊断多发性硬化症中的价值,这些数据来自临床孤立综合征初始队列的前瞻性数据。我们选择的患者有足够的数据来测定寡克隆带阳性、MRI在空间和时间上的分布、IgG指数和足够数量的配对CSF和血液样本来测定kappa游离轻链指数(n = 214)。我们使用Kendall's Tau系数来估计一致性,计算将每个阳性指标添加到空间传播和阳性寡克隆带时的额外诊断数量,对寡克隆带和每个指标进行生存分析,结果为第二次发作和2017年MRI传播在空间和时间上,并估计5年时寡克隆带和不同指标对上述结果的诊断特性。寡克隆带阳性138例(64.5%),kappa无轻链-5.9型136例(63.6%),kappa无轻链-6.6型135例(63.1%),kappa无轻链-10.61型126例(58.9%),IgG指数阳性101例(47.2%)。寡克隆条带与kappa自由轻链-6.6之间的一致性最高(τ = 0.727),其次是寡克隆条带与kappa自由轻链-5.9之间的一致性(τ = 0.716)。结合空间传播加寡克隆带或kappa free light chain-5.9, kappa free light chain-6.6增加10例(4.7%),kappa free light chain-10.61增加9例(4.2%),IgG指数增加3例(1.4%)。低克隆条带或指数阳性的患者在空间和时间上到达第二次发作和MRI播散的时间均快于阴性患者(P < 0.0001,但第二次发作IgG指数P = 0.016)。在多变量Cox模型[校正风险比(95%置信区间)]中,kappa free light chain-5.9 [2.0 (0.9-4.3), P = 0.068]与kappa free light chain-6.6 [2.1 (1.1-4.2), P = 0.035]的二次发作风险非常相似。kappa free light chain-5.9 [4.9 (2.5-9.6), P < 0.0001]的MRI播散空间和时间风险最高,其次是kappa free light chain-6.6 [3.4 (1.9-6.3), P < 0.0001]。Kappa游离轻链-5.9和-6.6对二次发作的诊断准确率略高于寡克隆带(70.5、71.1和67.8)和MRI传播在空间和时间上的诊断准确率(85.7、85.1和81.0)。Kappa游离轻链指数5.9和6.6在评估多发性硬化风险和诊断准确性方面略优于寡克隆带。鉴于寡克隆带与这些指标的一致性,我们建议将空间散布加阳性寡克隆带或阳性kappa游离轻链指数作为多发性硬化症的改良诊断标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书