[Retrospective analysis of routine-MRI and correlation with aetiology of dementia, severity and neuropsychology in a memory-clinic population].

Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie Pub Date : 2011-11-01 Epub Date: 2011-11-02 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1281641
S Merkle, S Kreil, G Suttner, M Doelken, A Dörfler, T Richter-Schmidinger, J Kornhuber, M Weih
{"title":"[Retrospective analysis of routine-MRI and correlation with aetiology of dementia, severity and neuropsychology in a memory-clinic population].","authors":"S Merkle,&nbsp;S Kreil,&nbsp;G Suttner,&nbsp;M Doelken,&nbsp;A Dörfler,&nbsp;T Richter-Schmidinger,&nbsp;J Kornhuber,&nbsp;M Weih","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1281641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The contribution of potential treatable dementia aetiologies diagnosed using cerebral imaging varied considerably in previous studies and was not evaluated in a recent larger German sample of patients from a memory clinic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>MRI images of 502 patients were retrospectively reassessed. Beside the proportion of potentially treatable dementia aetiology, the extent of whole brain atrophy (semiquantitative) and vascular white matter lesions were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the patients was 63.7 ± 13.1 years; 49 % were female, mean MMST was 24.2 ± 5.5. In 74 % there was an agreement between the clinical dementia syndrome and MRI. 9 % (45 patients) had clearly discrepant imaging results, according to MRI criteria (21 × ischaemia, 20 × normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), 4 × intracerebral haemorrhage). These patients could not not be differentiated using age and MMST alone as clinical criteria. There was a significant correlation between global brain atrophy and MMST (r = -0.32; p < 0.001) and white matter lesion score (r = 0.28; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 9 % there was a clear discrepancy between MRI results and the clinical syndrome diagnosis in memory-clinic patients. As known from earlier studies and current German 3 rd generation guidelines, it is reasonable to perform MRI imaging in dementia to improve the aetiological and differential diagnoses and to detect a different aetiology that can be missed using the clinical dementia criteria alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":509563,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"642-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1281641","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The contribution of potential treatable dementia aetiologies diagnosed using cerebral imaging varied considerably in previous studies and was not evaluated in a recent larger German sample of patients from a memory clinic.

Material and methods: MRI images of 502 patients were retrospectively reassessed. Beside the proportion of potentially treatable dementia aetiology, the extent of whole brain atrophy (semiquantitative) and vascular white matter lesions were assessed.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 63.7 ± 13.1 years; 49 % were female, mean MMST was 24.2 ± 5.5. In 74 % there was an agreement between the clinical dementia syndrome and MRI. 9 % (45 patients) had clearly discrepant imaging results, according to MRI criteria (21 × ischaemia, 20 × normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), 4 × intracerebral haemorrhage). These patients could not not be differentiated using age and MMST alone as clinical criteria. There was a significant correlation between global brain atrophy and MMST (r = -0.32; p < 0.001) and white matter lesion score (r = 0.28; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In 9 % there was a clear discrepancy between MRI results and the clinical syndrome diagnosis in memory-clinic patients. As known from earlier studies and current German 3 rd generation guidelines, it is reasonable to perform MRI imaging in dementia to improve the aetiological and differential diagnoses and to detect a different aetiology that can be missed using the clinical dementia criteria alone.

[回顾性分析记忆门诊人群中常规mri与痴呆病因、严重程度和神经心理学的相关性]。
背景:在以前的研究中,使用脑成像诊断的潜在可治疗痴呆病因的贡献差异很大,最近在德国记忆诊所的患者样本中没有进行评估。材料与方法:回顾性分析502例患者的MRI影像。除了潜在可治疗的痴呆病因比例外,还评估了全脑萎缩(半定量)和血管白质病变的程度。结果:患者平均年龄63.7±13.1岁;49%为女性,平均MMST为24.2±5.5。在74%的患者中,临床痴呆综合征与MRI相符。9%(45例)的MRI诊断标准(21 ×缺血,20 ×常压脑积水,4 ×脑出血)有明显差异。这些患者不能仅以年龄和MMST作为临床标准进行区分。全脑萎缩与MMST有显著相关性(r = -0.32;P < 0.001)和白质病变评分(r = 0.28;P < 0.001)。结论:9%的记忆临床患者MRI结果与临床综合征诊断有明显差异。从早期的研究和目前的德国第三代指南中得知,在痴呆症中进行MRI成像是合理的,以改善病因学和鉴别诊断,并发现单独使用临床痴呆标准可能遗漏的不同病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书