Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in the treatment of acute middle cerebral artery infarction: a critically appraised topic.

Christopher Kramer, Maria I Aguilar, Charlene Hoffman-Snyder, Kay E Wellik, Dean M Wingerchuk, Bart M Demaerschalk
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in the treatment of acute middle cerebral artery infarction: a critically appraised topic.","authors":"Christopher Kramer,&nbsp;Maria I Aguilar,&nbsp;Charlene Hoffman-Snyder,&nbsp;Kay E Wellik,&nbsp;Dean M Wingerchuk,&nbsp;Bart M Demaerschalk","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0b013e318236e041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite appropriate therapy with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a significant proportion of patients with acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction continue to suffer residual disability or death. The therapeutic use of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) concomitantly with IV tPA is speculated to increase recanalization rates and improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute MCA stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically appraise the evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of the simultaneous delivery of IV tPA and continuous TCD monitoring as an acute therapy in patients with MCA territory infarction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. This incorporated a clinical scenario, background information, a structured question, literature search strategy, results, critical appraisal, clinical bottom line, and expert commentary from vascular neurology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a multicenter phase II randomized controlled study, 126 patients with acute MCA stroke were randomized to receive treatment with IV tPA and continuous TCD monitoring or placebo monitoring. Complete recanalization or dramatic clinical recovery within 2 hours after the administration of a tPA bolus occurred in 31 patients in the target group (49%), as compared with 19 patients in the control group (30%); P=0.03. At 3 months, of the patients eligible for follow-up, 22 of 53 (42%) in the target group and 14 of 49 (29%) in the control group had favorable outcomes; P=0.20. Four symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages were noted in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic use of continuous TCD monitoring concomitantly with IV tPA increases recanalization rates in patients with acute MCA stroke relative to treatment with IV tPA alone without increasing the complication of intracerebral hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":519230,"journal":{"name":"The Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":"346-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NRL.0b013e318236e041","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0b013e318236e041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Despite appropriate therapy with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a significant proportion of patients with acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction continue to suffer residual disability or death. The therapeutic use of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) concomitantly with IV tPA is speculated to increase recanalization rates and improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute MCA stroke.

Objective: To critically appraise the evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of the simultaneous delivery of IV tPA and continuous TCD monitoring as an acute therapy in patients with MCA territory infarction.

Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. This incorporated a clinical scenario, background information, a structured question, literature search strategy, results, critical appraisal, clinical bottom line, and expert commentary from vascular neurology.

Results: In a multicenter phase II randomized controlled study, 126 patients with acute MCA stroke were randomized to receive treatment with IV tPA and continuous TCD monitoring or placebo monitoring. Complete recanalization or dramatic clinical recovery within 2 hours after the administration of a tPA bolus occurred in 31 patients in the target group (49%), as compared with 19 patients in the control group (30%); P=0.03. At 3 months, of the patients eligible for follow-up, 22 of 53 (42%) in the target group and 14 of 49 (29%) in the control group had favorable outcomes; P=0.20. Four symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages were noted in each group.

Conclusions: Therapeutic use of continuous TCD monitoring concomitantly with IV tPA increases recanalization rates in patients with acute MCA stroke relative to treatment with IV tPA alone without increasing the complication of intracerebral hemorrhage.

超声增强溶栓治疗急性大脑中动脉梗死的安全性和有效性:一个批判性评价的话题。
背景:尽管适当的静脉(IV)组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)治疗,很大比例的急性大脑中动脉(MCA)梗死患者仍然存在残障或死亡。推测经颅多普勒超声(TCD)联合静脉注射tPA治疗可提高急性MCA脑卒中患者的再通率,改善临床预后。目的:对同时给予静脉注射tPA和连续TCD监测作为急性治疗中动脉梗死患者的安全性和有效性进行批判性评价。方法:目标是通过发展一个结构化的,批判性评估的主题。这包括临床场景、背景信息、结构化问题、文献检索策略、结果、批判性评价、临床底线和血管神经学专家评论。结果:在一项多中心II期随机对照研究中,126例急性MCA卒中患者随机接受静脉tPA治疗和连续TCD监测或安慰剂监测。靶组31例患者(49%)在给予tPA丸后2小时内完全再通或显著临床恢复,对照组19例患者(30%);P = 0.03。在3个月时,符合随访条件的患者中,目标组53例中有22例(42%),对照组49例中有14例(29%)预后良好;P = 0.20。两组均出现4例症状性脑出血。结论:与单纯静脉注射tPA治疗相比,持续TCD监测联合静脉注射tPA治疗可提高急性MCA脑卒中患者的再通率,且不增加脑出血并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信