Validation of the Danish version of Oxford Shoulder Score.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-11-01
Lars Henrik Frich, Peter Moensted Noergaard, Stig Brorson
{"title":"Validation of the Danish version of Oxford Shoulder Score.","authors":"Lars Henrik Frich,&nbsp;Peter Moensted Noergaard,&nbsp;Stig Brorson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a patient-administered condition-specific questionnaire for patients with degenerative or inflammatory shoulder disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a Danish translation of the OSS and to compare it with the Constant Score (CS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 102 consecutive patients referred to our shoulder unit were recruited for the study. The OSS was translated into Danish according to recommendations presented by Guillemin and co-workers. We established the psychometric properties of the scoring system. Test-retest reliability was assessed by inviting 32 patients to complete another OSS 72 hours after the first test. The Bland-Altman plot was used to show absolute differences between test and retest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validity expressed as a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient comparing the OSS with the CS was 0.74. The test-retest reliability correlation coefficient was 0.98. Bland-Altman plots revealed limits of agreement between the scores of -4.5 and -5.4. Internal consistency tested by Cronbach's alpha was 0.93.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric properties of the Danish version of OSS showed good validity and reliability with a substantial correlation between the OSS and the CS. Internal consistency was high. The OSS is recommended for the evaluation of patients with degenerative or post-traumatic shoulder diseases.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 11","pages":"A4335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a patient-administered condition-specific questionnaire for patients with degenerative or inflammatory shoulder disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a Danish translation of the OSS and to compare it with the Constant Score (CS).

Material and methods: A total of 102 consecutive patients referred to our shoulder unit were recruited for the study. The OSS was translated into Danish according to recommendations presented by Guillemin and co-workers. We established the psychometric properties of the scoring system. Test-retest reliability was assessed by inviting 32 patients to complete another OSS 72 hours after the first test. The Bland-Altman plot was used to show absolute differences between test and retest.

Results: The validity expressed as a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient comparing the OSS with the CS was 0.74. The test-retest reliability correlation coefficient was 0.98. Bland-Altman plots revealed limits of agreement between the scores of -4.5 and -5.4. Internal consistency tested by Cronbach's alpha was 0.93.

Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Danish version of OSS showed good validity and reliability with a substantial correlation between the OSS and the CS. Internal consistency was high. The OSS is recommended for the evaluation of patients with degenerative or post-traumatic shoulder diseases.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: not relevant.

丹麦版牛津肩谱的验证。
简介:牛津肩部评分(OSS)是一项针对退行性或炎症性肩关节疾病患者的患者管理的条件特异性问卷。本研究的目的是验证OSS的丹麦语翻译,并将其与恒定评分(CS)进行比较。材料和方法:研究共招募了102例转介至我们肩关节部的连续患者。根据Guillemin及其同事提出的建议,OSS被翻译成丹麦语。我们建立了评分系统的心理测量特性。通过邀请32名患者在第一次测试后72小时完成另一次OSS来评估重测可靠性。Bland-Altman图用于显示检验与复验之间的绝对差异。结果:OSS与CS比较的效度以Spearman等级相关系数表示为0.74。重测信度相关系数为0.98。布兰德-奥特曼图显示,-4.5和-5.4的分数之间存在一定的一致性。内部一致性经Cronbach's alpha检验为0.93。结论:丹麦版OSS的心理测量特性具有良好的效度和信度,OSS与CS具有显著的相关性。内部一致性高。OSS被推荐用于评估退行性或创伤后肩关节疾病患者。资金:不相关。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信