Reproducibility of the physiological cost index among individuals with a lower-limb amputation and healthy adults.

Kerstin Hagberg, Roy Tranberg, Roland Zügner, Anna Danielsson
{"title":"Reproducibility of the physiological cost index among individuals with a lower-limb amputation and healthy adults.","authors":"Kerstin Hagberg,&nbsp;Roy Tranberg,&nbsp;Roland Zügner,&nbsp;Anna Danielsson","doi":"10.1002/pri.477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The physiological cost index (PCI) is a clinical measurement used to estimate the energy cost of walking. The reproducibility of the PCI has been questioned and no study has investigated the measurement error among individuals with a lower-limb amputation. The aim was to investigate the test-retest reproducibility of the PCI in individuals with a lower-limb amputation and healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised 28 individuals (20 males, eight females, mean age 49 years) with a unilateral amputation due to reasons other than vascular disease and 31 healthy volunteers (20 males, 11 females, mean age 47 years). PCI values were obtained by registering heart rate at rest and during level indoor walking for 5 minutes at a comfortable speed. A within-day test-retest assessment was performed. Reproducibility analyses included intra-class correlation, analyses of systematic differences between measurements, calculation of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and coefficient of variation (CV), and the results were finally visualized using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability in terms of intra-class correlation was excellent for both groups (0.966 and 0.948). In the amputee group, the PCI revealed a mean difference of 0.026 (p = 0.016) between tests (PCI = 0.555, standard deviation [SD] = 0.214 and PCI = 0.581, SD = 0.236, respectively). In the healthy group, there was no systematic difference between tests (PCI = 0.329, SD = 0.114 and PCI = 0.331, SD = 0.110, respectively). The SDC was 0.116 in the amputee group and 0.070 in the healthy group, giving a CV of 20.4% and 21.0%,respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The within-day test-retest reproducibility of the PCI was excellent among individuals with lower-limb amputations and healthy adults in terms of intra-class correlation and acceptable in terms of agreement. The SDC, which was calculated for each group, should be considered when demonstrating an individual difference after an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":519522,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":"92-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.477","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background and purpose: The physiological cost index (PCI) is a clinical measurement used to estimate the energy cost of walking. The reproducibility of the PCI has been questioned and no study has investigated the measurement error among individuals with a lower-limb amputation. The aim was to investigate the test-retest reproducibility of the PCI in individuals with a lower-limb amputation and healthy adults.

Methods: The study comprised 28 individuals (20 males, eight females, mean age 49 years) with a unilateral amputation due to reasons other than vascular disease and 31 healthy volunteers (20 males, 11 females, mean age 47 years). PCI values were obtained by registering heart rate at rest and during level indoor walking for 5 minutes at a comfortable speed. A within-day test-retest assessment was performed. Reproducibility analyses included intra-class correlation, analyses of systematic differences between measurements, calculation of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and coefficient of variation (CV), and the results were finally visualized using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: The reliability in terms of intra-class correlation was excellent for both groups (0.966 and 0.948). In the amputee group, the PCI revealed a mean difference of 0.026 (p = 0.016) between tests (PCI = 0.555, standard deviation [SD] = 0.214 and PCI = 0.581, SD = 0.236, respectively). In the healthy group, there was no systematic difference between tests (PCI = 0.329, SD = 0.114 and PCI = 0.331, SD = 0.110, respectively). The SDC was 0.116 in the amputee group and 0.070 in the healthy group, giving a CV of 20.4% and 21.0%,respectively.

Conclusions: The within-day test-retest reproducibility of the PCI was excellent among individuals with lower-limb amputations and healthy adults in terms of intra-class correlation and acceptable in terms of agreement. The SDC, which was calculated for each group, should be considered when demonstrating an individual difference after an intervention.

下肢截肢者和健康成人生理成本指数的可重复性。
背景与目的:生理成本指数(physical cost index, PCI)是一种用于评估步行能量成本的临床指标。PCI的可重复性受到质疑,没有研究调查下肢截肢患者的测量误差。目的是研究PCI在下肢截肢患者和健康成人中的测试-再测试可重复性。方法:本研究纳入28例非血管性疾病单侧截肢患者(男性20例,女性8例,平均年龄49岁)和31例健康志愿者(男性20例,女性11例,平均年龄47岁)。通过记录休息时的心率和以舒适的速度在室内步行5分钟的心率来获得PCI值。在一天内进行测试-重测试评估。可重复性分析包括类内相关性分析、测量间的系统差异分析、最小可检测变化(SDC)和变异系数(CV)的计算,并最终使用Bland-Altman图将结果可视化。结果:两组的类内相关信度均为极好(0.966和0.948)。在截肢者组中,PCI显示两组测试之间的平均差异为0.026 (p = 0.016) (PCI = 0.555,标准差[SD] = 0.214和PCI = 0.581, SD = 0.236)。健康组两组间无系统差异(PCI = 0.329, SD = 0.114, PCI = 0.331, SD = 0.110)。截肢组和健康组的SDC分别为0.116和0.070,CV分别为20.4%和21.0%。结论:就类内相关性而言,在下肢截肢者和健康成人中,PCI的一天内测试-再测试的重复性是很好的,在一致性方面是可以接受的。在证明干预后的个体差异时,应考虑为每组计算的SDC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信