Optimal slice thickness for cone-beam CT with on-board imager.

Kyt Seet, A Barghi, S Yartsev, J Van Dyk
{"title":"Optimal slice thickness for cone-beam CT with on-board imager.","authors":"Kyt Seet, A Barghi, S Yartsev, J Van Dyk","doi":"10.2349/biij.6.3.e31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To find the optimal slice thickness (Δτ) setting for patient registration with kilovoltage cone-beam CT (kVCBCT) on the Varian On Board Imager (OBI) system by investigating the relationship of slice thickness to automatic registration accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Automatic registration was performed on kVCBCT studies of the head and pelvis of a RANDO anthropomorphic phantom. Images were reconstructed with 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 at 1.0 mm increments. The phantoms were offset by a known amount, and the suggested shifts were compared to the known shifts by calculating the residual error. A uniform cylindrical phantom with cylindrical inserts of various known CT numbers was scanned with kVCBCT at 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 at increments of 0.5 mm. The contrast-to-noise ratios for the inserts were measured at each Δτ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the planning CT slice thickness used in this study, there was no significant difference in residual error below a threshold equal to the planning CT slice thickness. For Δτ > 3.0 mm, residual error increased for both the head and pelvis phantom studies. The contrast-to-noise ratio is proportional to slice thickness until Δτ = 2.5 mm. Beyond this point, the contrast-to-noise ratio was not affected by Δτ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic registration accuracy is greatest when 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 3.0 is used. Contrast-to-noise ratio is optimal for the 2.5 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 range. Therefore 2.5 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 3.0 is recommended for kVCBCT patient registration where the planning CT is 3.0 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":89331,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal","volume":"6 3","pages":"e31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.3.e31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To find the optimal slice thickness (Δτ) setting for patient registration with kilovoltage cone-beam CT (kVCBCT) on the Varian On Board Imager (OBI) system by investigating the relationship of slice thickness to automatic registration accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio.

Materials and method: Automatic registration was performed on kVCBCT studies of the head and pelvis of a RANDO anthropomorphic phantom. Images were reconstructed with 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 at 1.0 mm increments. The phantoms were offset by a known amount, and the suggested shifts were compared to the known shifts by calculating the residual error. A uniform cylindrical phantom with cylindrical inserts of various known CT numbers was scanned with kVCBCT at 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 at increments of 0.5 mm. The contrast-to-noise ratios for the inserts were measured at each Δτ.

Results: For the planning CT slice thickness used in this study, there was no significant difference in residual error below a threshold equal to the planning CT slice thickness. For Δτ > 3.0 mm, residual error increased for both the head and pelvis phantom studies. The contrast-to-noise ratio is proportional to slice thickness until Δτ = 2.5 mm. Beyond this point, the contrast-to-noise ratio was not affected by Δτ.

Conclusion: Automatic registration accuracy is greatest when 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 3.0 is used. Contrast-to-noise ratio is optimal for the 2.5 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 range. Therefore 2.5 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 3.0 is recommended for kVCBCT patient registration where the planning CT is 3.0 mm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用机载成像仪进行锥形束 CT 的最佳切片厚度。
目的:通过研究切片厚度与自动配准准确性和对比-噪声比之间的关系,找出在瓦里安板载成像仪(OBI)系统上使用千伏锥束 CT(kVCBCT)进行患者配准的最佳切片厚度(Δτ)设置:对 RANDO 拟人化模型的头部和骨盆进行 kVCBCT 研究,并进行自动配准。图像重建为 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0,增量为 1.0 mm。模型偏移量已知,通过计算残余误差将建议偏移量与已知偏移量进行比较。kVCBCT 以 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0、0.5 mm 为增量对带有各种已知 CT 编号圆柱形插入物的均匀圆柱形模型进行扫描。在每个 Δτ 处测量插入物的对比噪声比:对于本研究中使用的规划 CT 切片厚度,残余误差在阈值等于规划 CT 切片厚度以下没有显著差异。当 Δτ > 3.0 毫米时,头部和骨盆模型研究的残余误差都会增加。在 Δτ = 2.5 毫米之前,对比度-噪声比与切片厚度成正比。结论:当使用 1.0 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 3.0 时,自动配准精度最高。在 2.5 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 5.0 的范围内,对比度-噪声比最佳。因此,在规划 CT 为 3.0 mm 的情况下,建议 kVCBCT 患者注册时使用 2.5 ≤ Δτ (mm) ≤ 3.0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信