Endothelial dysfunction predicts clinical restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Peter Scott Munk, Noreen Butt, Alf Inge Larsen
{"title":"Endothelial dysfunction predicts clinical restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Peter Scott Munk,&nbsp;Noreen Butt,&nbsp;Alf Inge Larsen","doi":"10.3109/14017431.2011.564646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endothelial dysfunction is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease and may predict in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated if endothelial dysfunction could predict clinical and angiographic restenosis in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation for angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients were consecutively included after successful percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for angiographic single vessel disease. All patients were evaluated with ultrasound detection of brachial artery reactivity at four weeks and with a symptom limited exercise stress test at six months and were followed for the occurrence of clinical or angiographic restenosis for 18 ± 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients showed clinical signs of restenosis during 18 months follow-up and were referred to re-angiography. Patients with clinical restenosis had impaired flow mediated vasodilation compared to patients without clinical restenosis (5.8 ± 3.4 vs. 9.0 ± 4.8, p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis flow mediated vasodilation was the only independent predictor for the risk of clinical restenosis (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.11 to 17.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired flow mediated vasodilation four weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention independently predicts the risk of clinical restenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":137876,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","volume":" ","pages":"139-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14017431.2011.564646","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2011.564646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Endothelial dysfunction is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease and may predict in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated if endothelial dysfunction could predict clinical and angiographic restenosis in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation for angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome.

Methods: One hundred patients were consecutively included after successful percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for angiographic single vessel disease. All patients were evaluated with ultrasound detection of brachial artery reactivity at four weeks and with a symptom limited exercise stress test at six months and were followed for the occurrence of clinical or angiographic restenosis for 18 ± 6 months.

Results: Twenty patients showed clinical signs of restenosis during 18 months follow-up and were referred to re-angiography. Patients with clinical restenosis had impaired flow mediated vasodilation compared to patients without clinical restenosis (5.8 ± 3.4 vs. 9.0 ± 4.8, p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis flow mediated vasodilation was the only independent predictor for the risk of clinical restenosis (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.11 to 17.8).

Conclusions: Impaired flow mediated vasodilation four weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention independently predicts the risk of clinical restenosis.

内皮功能障碍预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床再狭窄。
背景:内皮功能障碍与冠状动脉疾病患者心血管事件风险增加相关,并可预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄。我们评估了内皮功能障碍是否可以预测心绞痛或急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入支架植入术后的临床和血管造影再狭窄。方法:对100例经皮冠状动脉介入支架置入术成功的单支血管病变患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者于4周时接受肱动脉反应性超声检测,6个月时接受症状限制性运动应激试验,随访18±6个月,观察临床或血管造影再狭窄的发生情况。结果:随访18个月,有20例患者出现再狭窄临床症状,并行再血管造影。临床再狭窄患者与无临床再狭窄患者相比,血流介导的血管舒张功能受损(5.8±3.4比9.0±4.8,p = 0.005)。在多变量分析中,血流介导的血管舒张是临床再狭窄风险的唯一独立预测因子(OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.11 ~ 17.8)。结论:经皮冠状动脉介入术后4周血流介导的血管舒张功能受损可独立预测临床再狭窄的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书