A systematic review of elderly suicide prevention programs.

Crisis Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000076
Sylvie Lapierre, Annette Erlangsen, Margda Waern, Diego De Leo, Hirofumi Oyama, Paolo Scocco, Joseph Gallo, Katalin Szanto, Yeates Conwell, Brian Draper, Paul Quinnett
{"title":"A systematic review of elderly suicide prevention programs.","authors":"Sylvie Lapierre, Annette Erlangsen, Margda Waern, Diego De Leo, Hirofumi Oyama, Paolo Scocco, Joseph Gallo, Katalin Szanto, Yeates Conwell, Brian Draper, Paul Quinnett","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide rates are highest among the elderly, yet research on suicide prevention in old age remains a much-neglected area.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We carried out a systematic review to examine the results of interventions aimed at suicidal elderly persons and to identify successful strategies and areas needing further exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches through various electronic databases yielded 19 studies with an empirical evaluation of a suicide prevention or intervention program designed especially for adults aged 60 years and older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most studies were centered on the reduction of risk factors (depression screening and treatment, and decreasing isolation), but when gender was considered, programs were mostly efficient for women. The empirical evaluations of programs attending to the needs of high-risk older adults seemed positive; most studies showed a reduction in the level of suicidal ideation of patients or in the suicide rate of the participating communities. However, not all studies used measures of suicidality to evaluate the outcome of the intervention, and rarely did they aim at improving protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Innovative strategies should improve resilience and positive aging, engage family and community gatekeepers, use telecommunications to reach vulnerable older adult, and evaluate the effects of means restriction and physicians education on elderly suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":520108,"journal":{"name":"Crisis","volume":" ","pages":"88-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728773/pdf/nihms479519.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide rates are highest among the elderly, yet research on suicide prevention in old age remains a much-neglected area.

Aims: We carried out a systematic review to examine the results of interventions aimed at suicidal elderly persons and to identify successful strategies and areas needing further exploration.

Methods: Searches through various electronic databases yielded 19 studies with an empirical evaluation of a suicide prevention or intervention program designed especially for adults aged 60 years and older.

Results: Most studies were centered on the reduction of risk factors (depression screening and treatment, and decreasing isolation), but when gender was considered, programs were mostly efficient for women. The empirical evaluations of programs attending to the needs of high-risk older adults seemed positive; most studies showed a reduction in the level of suicidal ideation of patients or in the suicide rate of the participating communities. However, not all studies used measures of suicidality to evaluate the outcome of the intervention, and rarely did they aim at improving protective factors.

Conclusions: Innovative strategies should improve resilience and positive aging, engage family and community gatekeepers, use telecommunications to reach vulnerable older adult, and evaluate the effects of means restriction and physicians education on elderly suicide.

老年人自杀预防项目的系统综述。
背景:老年人的自杀率最高,但对老年人自杀预防的研究仍然是一个被忽视的领域。目的:我们进行了一项系统综述,以检查针对自杀老年人的干预措施的结果,并确定成功的策略和需要进一步探索的领域。方法:通过各种电子数据库进行搜索,获得19项研究,这些研究对专门为60岁及以上的成年人设计的自杀预防或干预计划进行了实证评估。结果:大多数研究都集中在降低风险因素(抑郁症筛查和治疗,以及减少隔离)上,但当考虑到性别时,项目大多对女性有效。参与高危老年人需求的项目的经验评估似乎是积极的;大多数研究表明,患者的自杀意念水平或参与社区的自杀率都有所下降。然而,并不是所有的研究都使用自杀的测量方法来评估干预的结果,而且很少以改善保护因素为目标。结论:创新策略应提高老年人的心理弹性和积极老龄化,让家庭和社区看门人参与其中,利用电信手段接触脆弱的老年人,并评估手段限制和医生教育对老年人自杀的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书