Impact of withdrawal of the analgesic Co-proxamol on nonfatal self-poisoning in the UK.

Crisis Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000063
Keith Hawton, Helen Bergen, Keith Waters, Elizabeth Murphy, Jayne Cooper, Navneet Kapur
{"title":"Impact of withdrawal of the analgesic Co-proxamol on nonfatal self-poisoning in the UK.","authors":"Keith Hawton,&nbsp;Helen Bergen,&nbsp;Keith Waters,&nbsp;Elizabeth Murphy,&nbsp;Jayne Cooper,&nbsp;Navneet Kapur","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In early 2005 the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) announced gradual withdrawal of the analgesic co-proxamol because of its adverse benefit/safety ratio, especially its use for intentional and accidental fatal poisoning. Prescriptions of co-proxamol were reduced in the 3-year withdrawal phase (2005 to 2007) following the CSM announcement.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the impact of the CSM announcement in January 2005 to withdraw co-proxamol on nonfatal self-poisoning with co-proxamol and other analgesics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interrupted time series analysis of general hospital presentations for nonfatal self-poisoning (five hospitals in three centers in England), comparing the 3-year withdrawal period 2005-2007 with 2000-2004.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A marked reduction in the number of episodes of nonfatal self-poisoning episodes involving co-proxamol was found following the CSM announcement (an estimated 62% over the period 2005 to 2007 compared to 2000 to 2004). There was no evidence of an increase in nonfatal self-poisoning episodes involving other analgesics (co-codamol, codeine, co-dydramol, dihydrocodeine, and tramadol) in relation to the CSM announcement over the same period, nor a change in the number of all episodes of self-poisoning.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Data were from three centers only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of the policy appears to have reduced nonfatal self-poisoning with co-proxamol without significant substitution with other analgesics. This finding is in keeping with that for suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":520108,"journal":{"name":"Crisis","volume":" ","pages":"81-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: In early 2005 the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) announced gradual withdrawal of the analgesic co-proxamol because of its adverse benefit/safety ratio, especially its use for intentional and accidental fatal poisoning. Prescriptions of co-proxamol were reduced in the 3-year withdrawal phase (2005 to 2007) following the CSM announcement.

Aims: To assess the impact of the CSM announcement in January 2005 to withdraw co-proxamol on nonfatal self-poisoning with co-proxamol and other analgesics.

Methods: Interrupted time series analysis of general hospital presentations for nonfatal self-poisoning (five hospitals in three centers in England), comparing the 3-year withdrawal period 2005-2007 with 2000-2004.

Results: A marked reduction in the number of episodes of nonfatal self-poisoning episodes involving co-proxamol was found following the CSM announcement (an estimated 62% over the period 2005 to 2007 compared to 2000 to 2004). There was no evidence of an increase in nonfatal self-poisoning episodes involving other analgesics (co-codamol, codeine, co-dydramol, dihydrocodeine, and tramadol) in relation to the CSM announcement over the same period, nor a change in the number of all episodes of self-poisoning.

Limitations: Data were from three centers only.

Conclusions: The impact of the policy appears to have reduced nonfatal self-poisoning with co-proxamol without significant substitution with other analgesics. This finding is in keeping with that for suicide.

在英国,停止使用止痛剂Co-proxamol对非致命性自我中毒的影响。
背景:2005年初,英国药品安全委员会(CSM)宣布逐步停用止痛剂co-proxamol,因为它的不良获益/安全比,特别是它用于故意和意外致命中毒。在CSM宣布后的3年停药阶段(2005年至2007年),co-proxamol的处方减少了。目的:评价2005年1月中国药监总局宣布停用复方萘酚对复方萘酚及其他镇痛药非致死性自中毒的影响。方法:中断时间序列分析非致命性自我中毒的综合医院报告(英国3个中心的5家医院),比较2005-2007年和2000-2004年的3年停药期。结果:在CSM宣布后,发现涉及复方萘松的非致命性自我中毒事件的发生率显著降低(与2000年至2004年相比,2005年至2007年期间估计减少62%)。在同一时期,没有证据表明其他镇痛药(co-codamol、可待因、co-dydramol、二氢可待因和曲马多)引起的非致命性自我中毒事件增加,也没有证据表明所有自我中毒事件的次数发生变化。局限性:数据仅来自三个中心。结论:该政策的影响似乎减少了co-proxamol的非致命性自我中毒,而没有明显替代其他镇痛药。这一发现与自杀的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书