Scott C Forbes, Philip D Chilibeck, Bruce Craven, Yagesh Bhambhani
{"title":"Comparison of a double poling ergometer and field test for elite cross country sit skiers.","authors":"Scott C Forbes, Philip D Chilibeck, Bruce Craven, Yagesh Bhambhani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sport specific ergometers are important for laboratory testing (i.e. peak oxygen consumption (VO(2))) and out of season training.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare cardiorespiratory variables during exercise on a double poling ergometer to a field test in elite sit skiers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three male and four female athletes from the Canadian National / Developmental team (17-54 years of age, six with complete paraplegia and one with cerebral palsy) completed a field test and a double poling ergometer protocol separated by at least 24 hours. Both protocols consisted of three maximal trials of skiing of three minutes duration separated by 1.5 minutes of rest. A wireless metabolic system and heart rate monitor were used to measure cardiorespiratory responses [peak heart rate, peak VO(2), and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER)] during each test. Arterialized blood lactate was measured before the beginning of exercise, after each trial and at 5, 10 and 15 minutes post exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences existed between the field and ergometer tests for peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)) (field=34.7±5.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs. ergometer=33.4±6.9 mL·kg-1·min-1). Significantly higher peak heart rate and RER were found during the ergometer test. Significantly higher lactates were found during the ergometer test after trial 2 and trial 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The double poling ergometer is similar to a field test for evaluating peak VO(2) in elite cross country sit skiers; however, the ergometer test elicits a higher heart rate and anaerobic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":88617,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT","volume":"5 2","pages":"40-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953388/pdf/najspt-05-040.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sport specific ergometers are important for laboratory testing (i.e. peak oxygen consumption (VO(2))) and out of season training.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiorespiratory variables during exercise on a double poling ergometer to a field test in elite sit skiers.
Methods: Three male and four female athletes from the Canadian National / Developmental team (17-54 years of age, six with complete paraplegia and one with cerebral palsy) completed a field test and a double poling ergometer protocol separated by at least 24 hours. Both protocols consisted of three maximal trials of skiing of three minutes duration separated by 1.5 minutes of rest. A wireless metabolic system and heart rate monitor were used to measure cardiorespiratory responses [peak heart rate, peak VO(2), and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER)] during each test. Arterialized blood lactate was measured before the beginning of exercise, after each trial and at 5, 10 and 15 minutes post exercise.
Results: No significant differences existed between the field and ergometer tests for peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)) (field=34.7±5.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs. ergometer=33.4±6.9 mL·kg-1·min-1). Significantly higher peak heart rate and RER were found during the ergometer test. Significantly higher lactates were found during the ergometer test after trial 2 and trial 3.
Conclusion: The double poling ergometer is similar to a field test for evaluating peak VO(2) in elite cross country sit skiers; however, the ergometer test elicits a higher heart rate and anaerobic response.
背景:运动专用测功器对于实验室测试(即峰值耗氧量(VO(2)))和非季节训练很重要。目的:本研究的目的是比较在双杆测力仪上运动时的心肺变量和在优秀的坐式滑雪运动员中进行的现场测试。方法:来自加拿大国家/发展团队的3名男性和4名女性运动员(17-54岁,6名患有完全截瘫,1名患有脑瘫)完成了现场测试和双撑杆测力仪方案,间隔至少24小时。两种方案都包括三个持续时间为三分钟的极限滑雪试验,中间间隔1.5分钟的休息。使用无线代谢系统和心率监测器测量每次测试期间的心肺反应[峰值心率、峰值VO(2)和峰值呼吸交换比(RER)]。在运动开始前、每次试验后以及运动后5分钟、10分钟和15分钟测量动脉化血乳酸。结果:野外测试与ergometer测试的峰值耗氧量(VO(2))无显著差异(field=34.7±5.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs ergometer=33.4±6.9 mL·kg-1·min-1)。在测力仪测试中发现心率峰值和RER显著升高。在试验2和试验3之后的测力仪测试中,乳酸水平明显升高。结论:双杆测力仪类似于评估优秀越野坐式滑雪运动员VO(2)峰值的现场测试;然而,劳力计测试引起更高的心率和无氧反应。