Effect of gastric emptying and entero-hepatic circulation on bioequivalence assessment of ranitidine.

J Chrenova, M Durisova, C Mircioiu, L Dedik
{"title":"Effect of gastric emptying and entero-hepatic circulation on bioequivalence assessment of ranitidine.","authors":"J Chrenova,&nbsp;M Durisova,&nbsp;C Mircioiu,&nbsp;L Dedik","doi":"10.1358/mf.2010.32.6.1472184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of study was to compare the bioavailability of ranitidine obtained from either Ranitidine (300 mg tablet; LPH® S.C. LaborMed Pharma S.A. Romania: the test formulation) and Zantac® (300 mg tablet; GlaxoSmithKline, Austria: the reference formulation). Twelve, Romanian, healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. An open-label, two-period, crossover, randomized design was used. Plasma levels of ranitidine were determined using the validated, high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. The physiologically motivated time-delayed model was used for the data evaluation and a paired Student's t-test and Schuirmann's two one-sided tests were carried out to compare parameters. Nonmodeling parameters (AUC(t), AUC, C(max), T(max)) were tested by the paired Student's t-test and the 90 confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios were determined by Schuirmann's tests. Paired Student's t-test showed no significant differences between nonmodeling and modeling parameters. The results of the Schuirmann's tests however indicated significant statistical differences with reference to AUC(t), AUC, C(max), T(max) and other modeling parameters, especially MT(c) and τ(c). Schuirmann's tests revealed significant bioequivalence between ranitidine formulations using the modeling parameters MRT and n. The presented model can be useful as an additional tool to assess drug bioequivalence, by screening for disruptive parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":18443,"journal":{"name":"Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology","volume":"32 6","pages":"413-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2010.32.6.1472184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The aim of study was to compare the bioavailability of ranitidine obtained from either Ranitidine (300 mg tablet; LPH® S.C. LaborMed Pharma S.A. Romania: the test formulation) and Zantac® (300 mg tablet; GlaxoSmithKline, Austria: the reference formulation). Twelve, Romanian, healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. An open-label, two-period, crossover, randomized design was used. Plasma levels of ranitidine were determined using the validated, high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. The physiologically motivated time-delayed model was used for the data evaluation and a paired Student's t-test and Schuirmann's two one-sided tests were carried out to compare parameters. Nonmodeling parameters (AUC(t), AUC, C(max), T(max)) were tested by the paired Student's t-test and the 90 confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios were determined by Schuirmann's tests. Paired Student's t-test showed no significant differences between nonmodeling and modeling parameters. The results of the Schuirmann's tests however indicated significant statistical differences with reference to AUC(t), AUC, C(max), T(max) and other modeling parameters, especially MT(c) and τ(c). Schuirmann's tests revealed significant bioequivalence between ranitidine formulations using the modeling parameters MRT and n. The presented model can be useful as an additional tool to assess drug bioequivalence, by screening for disruptive parameters.

胃排空和肠肝循环对雷尼替丁生物等效性评价的影响。
本研究的目的是比较雷尼替丁(300mg片剂;LPH®S.C. LaborMed Pharma S.A.罗马尼亚:试验配方)和Zantac®(300mg片剂;葛兰素史克,奥地利:参考配方)。12名罗马尼亚健康志愿者参加了这项研究。采用开放标签、两期、交叉、随机设计。采用经验证的高压液相色谱法测定雷尼替丁的血浆水平。采用生理动机时滞模型进行数据评价,并采用配对Student's t检验和Schuirmann's双单侧检验进行参数比较。非建模参数(AUC(t)、AUC、C(max)、t (max))采用配对学生t检验检验,几何平均比的90个置信区间采用Schuirmann检验确定。配对学生t检验显示非建模参数与建模参数之间无显著差异。然而,Schuirmann检验的结果在AUC(t)、AUC、C(max)、t (max)和其他建模参数,特别是MT(C)和τ(C)方面显示出显著的统计差异。Schuirmann的试验显示,使用建模参数MRT和n,雷尼替丁制剂之间存在显著的生物等效性。通过筛选破坏性参数,该模型可以作为评估药物生物等效性的额外工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信