Flap Anchoring Following Primary Breast Cancer Surgery Facilitates Early Hospital Discharge and Reduces Costs.

Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2010-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-04-22 DOI:10.1159/000301586
Laurence M Almond, Laura Khodaverdi, Belindra Kumar, Eamonn C Coveney
{"title":"Flap Anchoring Following Primary Breast Cancer Surgery Facilitates Early Hospital Discharge and Reduces Costs.","authors":"Laurence M Almond,&nbsp;Laura Khodaverdi,&nbsp;Belindra Kumar,&nbsp;Eamonn C Coveney","doi":"10.1159/000301586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Routine drain placement after breast cancer surgery is standard practice. Anchoring the axillary and mastectomy flaps to the underlying chest wall with sutures has been advocated as a means of avoiding drainage following breast surgery. This study compares outcomes following flap fixation or routine drain placement and uniquely considers the economic implications of each technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on seroma formation and wound infection following mastectomy and axillary clearance were recorded prospectively. Patients underwent either routine drain placement or flap anchoring using subcutaneous tacking sutures without drainage. Equipment and surgical bed costs were provided by our finance department. RESULTS: Data was available for 135 patients. 76 underwent flap anchoring without drainage and 59 had routine drainage. There was no difference in seroma rates between the two groups: 49% vs. 59% (p = 0.22). However, the length of hospital stay was reduced in the flap fixation group: 1.88 vs. 2.67 days (p < 0.0001). Per patient, flap suturing equated to an estimated financial saving of £ 240. CONCLUSIONS: Flap anchoring resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay than routine drainage, with a comparable rate of seroma formation. This technique presents a viable alternative to drain placement and could lead to a considerable economic savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520575,"journal":{"name":"Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000301586","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000301586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine drain placement after breast cancer surgery is standard practice. Anchoring the axillary and mastectomy flaps to the underlying chest wall with sutures has been advocated as a means of avoiding drainage following breast surgery. This study compares outcomes following flap fixation or routine drain placement and uniquely considers the economic implications of each technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on seroma formation and wound infection following mastectomy and axillary clearance were recorded prospectively. Patients underwent either routine drain placement or flap anchoring using subcutaneous tacking sutures without drainage. Equipment and surgical bed costs were provided by our finance department. RESULTS: Data was available for 135 patients. 76 underwent flap anchoring without drainage and 59 had routine drainage. There was no difference in seroma rates between the two groups: 49% vs. 59% (p = 0.22). However, the length of hospital stay was reduced in the flap fixation group: 1.88 vs. 2.67 days (p < 0.0001). Per patient, flap suturing equated to an estimated financial saving of £ 240. CONCLUSIONS: Flap anchoring resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay than routine drainage, with a comparable rate of seroma formation. This technique presents a viable alternative to drain placement and could lead to a considerable economic savings.

Abstract Image

原发性乳腺癌手术后皮瓣锚定有助于早期出院并降低费用。
背景:乳腺癌手术后常规引流管放置是标准做法。用缝合线将腋窝和乳房切除皮瓣固定在胸壁下,被认为是避免乳房手术后引流的一种方法。本研究比较了皮瓣固定或常规引流管放置的结果,并独特地考虑了每种技术的经济意义。患者和方法:前瞻性记录乳房切除术和腋窝清扫后血清肿形成和伤口感染的数据。患者接受常规引流放置或皮瓣锚定使用皮下钉缝合不引流。设备和手术床位费用由财务部提供。结果:135例患者获得数据。76例行皮瓣锚定不引流,59例行常规引流。两组血清肿率无差异:分别为49%和59% (p = 0.22)。然而,皮瓣固定组住院时间缩短:1.88天比2.67天(p < 0.0001)。每个病人,皮瓣缝合相当于估计节省240英镑的财政。结论:与常规引流相比,皮瓣锚定术的住院时间明显缩短,且血肿形成率相当。这种技术提供了一种可行的替代排水管位置的方法,并且可以节省大量的经济成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信