[Placement of stimulus electrodes and heart rate during electroconvulsive therapy].

Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie Pub Date : 2010-10-01 Epub Date: 2010-09-14 DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1245600
J Nagler
{"title":"[Placement of stimulus electrodes and heart rate during electroconvulsive therapy].","authors":"J Nagler","doi":"10.1055/s-0029-1245600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bifrontal stimulation in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been increasingly administered and evaluated over the past years. However, no attention has been paid to cardiac side effects of this novel form of treatment during the application of the electrical stimuli.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cardiac responses to different electrode positions were compared intraindividually, using synchronised electrocardiograms and waveforms of pulse oximetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unilateral ECT gave rise to a marked cardiac response during stimulation. Intervals between two consecutive heartbeats increased from 0.6 ± 0.0 sec to 4.1 ± 3.4 sec (mean ± standard deviation). In contrast, stable heart actions were documented in the same patients during bifrontal stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The placement of the stimulus electrodes for ECT determines the incidence of asystole events during stimulation. Bifrontal electrode positioning results in less activation of the vagus nerve than unilateral treatment. The longer distance from the electrode site to the nerve in bifrontal treatment could account for these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":509563,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"599-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0029-1245600","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Bifrontal stimulation in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been increasingly administered and evaluated over the past years. However, no attention has been paid to cardiac side effects of this novel form of treatment during the application of the electrical stimuli.

Method: Cardiac responses to different electrode positions were compared intraindividually, using synchronised electrocardiograms and waveforms of pulse oximetry.

Results: Unilateral ECT gave rise to a marked cardiac response during stimulation. Intervals between two consecutive heartbeats increased from 0.6 ± 0.0 sec to 4.1 ± 3.4 sec (mean ± standard deviation). In contrast, stable heart actions were documented in the same patients during bifrontal stimulation.

Conclusion: The placement of the stimulus electrodes for ECT determines the incidence of asystole events during stimulation. Bifrontal electrode positioning results in less activation of the vagus nerve than unilateral treatment. The longer distance from the electrode site to the nerve in bifrontal treatment could account for these findings.

[电痉挛治疗中刺激电极的放置和心率]。
目的:在过去的几年里,电休克治疗(ECT)中的双额刺激越来越多地被使用和评估。然而,在电刺激的应用过程中,没有注意到这种新型治疗方式对心脏的副作用。方法:采用同步心电图和脉搏血氧仪波形,比较不同电极位置下的心脏反应。结果:单侧电痉挛在刺激时引起明显的心脏反应。两次连续心跳间隔从0.6±0.0秒增加到4.1±3.4秒(平均值±标准差)。相比之下,同一患者在双额刺激时心脏活动稳定。结论:电痉挛刺激电极的放置决定了刺激过程中心脏骤停事件的发生率。双额电极定位导致迷走神经的激活比单侧治疗少。在双额治疗中,从电极位置到神经的较长距离可以解释这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书