Analyzing musculoskeletal risk-severity among small scale casting workers using ergonomic assessment tools: A statistical approach.

Krishan Kumar Kataria, Milap Sharma, Narendra Mohan Suri, Suman Kant, Sunil Luthra
{"title":"Analyzing musculoskeletal risk-severity among small scale casting workers using ergonomic assessment tools: A statistical approach.","authors":"Krishan Kumar Kataria,&nbsp;Milap Sharma,&nbsp;Narendra Mohan Suri,&nbsp;Suman Kant,&nbsp;Sunil Luthra","doi":"10.3233/WOR-210867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are leading cause of injuries among economically backward workers employed under small scale metal casting units especially in developing countries. In India, most casting unit's falls under small and medium enterprises having inadequacy of advanced technological equipment's due to several economic constraints and rely intensively on manual labour. Foundry work is very much prone to WMSDs involving much physical interaction of workers with their jobs which includes several risk factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study objectives were to analyse the musculoskeletal risk prevalence among small scale casting workers using ergonomic assessment tools and statistical approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In present study, WMSDs risk prevalence has been examined using Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and virtual ergonomics. Further, risk evaluations were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test and Taguchi L25 orthogonal array.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed manual handling task as being most vulnerable followed by the fettling section. Statistically significant differences were observed (p-value < 0.05) among all the work-sections except lift-lower task and molding section (p = 0.361; p > 0.05) for left side region; and lift-lower task and fettling section (p = 0.230; p > 0.05) for the right side region, where differences were not statistically significant. ANOVA results indicated that workstation height followed by population percentile and object weight were dominant factors significantly affecting the response parameter i.e. L4-L5 spine compression (p-value < 0.01); however workstation width (p-value > 0.05) had no significant effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study may guide foundry industrialists in analysing the mismatch between the workers' job profile and redesigning existing workstation layouts in small scale foundries based on minimizing the WMSDs risk severity associated with the work tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":319034,"journal":{"name":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are leading cause of injuries among economically backward workers employed under small scale metal casting units especially in developing countries. In India, most casting unit's falls under small and medium enterprises having inadequacy of advanced technological equipment's due to several economic constraints and rely intensively on manual labour. Foundry work is very much prone to WMSDs involving much physical interaction of workers with their jobs which includes several risk factors.

Objective: The study objectives were to analyse the musculoskeletal risk prevalence among small scale casting workers using ergonomic assessment tools and statistical approach.

Methods: In present study, WMSDs risk prevalence has been examined using Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and virtual ergonomics. Further, risk evaluations were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test and Taguchi L25 orthogonal array.

Results: Results revealed manual handling task as being most vulnerable followed by the fettling section. Statistically significant differences were observed (p-value < 0.05) among all the work-sections except lift-lower task and molding section (p = 0.361; p > 0.05) for left side region; and lift-lower task and fettling section (p = 0.230; p > 0.05) for the right side region, where differences were not statistically significant. ANOVA results indicated that workstation height followed by population percentile and object weight were dominant factors significantly affecting the response parameter i.e. L4-L5 spine compression (p-value < 0.01); however workstation width (p-value > 0.05) had no significant effect.

Conclusion: The present study may guide foundry industrialists in analysing the mismatch between the workers' job profile and redesigning existing workstation layouts in small scale foundries based on minimizing the WMSDs risk severity associated with the work tasks.

使用人体工程学评估工具分析小规模铸造工人肌肉骨骼风险严重程度:一种统计方法。
背景:与工作有关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)是小型金属铸造单位经济落后工人受伤的主要原因,特别是在发展中国家。在印度,由于一些经济限制,大多数铸造单位属于中小型企业,缺乏先进的技术设备,主要依靠体力劳动。铸造工作非常容易发生wmsd,涉及工人与工作的大量身体互动,其中包括几个风险因素。目的:利用人体工程学评估工具和统计学方法分析小规模铸造工人肌肉骨骼风险的流行情况。方法:本研究采用快速全身评估(REBA)和虚拟人体工程学技术对WMSDs的患病率进行检测。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Taguchi L25正交试验进行风险评价分析。结果:结果显示,人工搬运任务是最脆弱的,其次是搬运部分。左侧区差异有统计学意义(p值0.05);和升降任务及沉降段(p = 0.230;右侧区域P > 0.05),差异无统计学意义。方差分析结果显示,工作站高度是影响L4-L5脊柱受压反应参数的主要因素,其次是总体百分位数和物体重量(p值0.05)。结论:本研究可指导铸造厂业者分析小型铸造厂工人工作特征与重新设计现有工作站布局之间的不匹配,以最大限度地降低与工作任务相关的wmsd风险严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信