Moving beyond the patients' views on the process of return to work after cancer: A qualitative evidence synthesis on articles published between 2008 and 2017.

Adela Elena Popa
{"title":"Moving beyond the patients' views on the process of return to work after cancer: A qualitative evidence synthesis on articles published between 2008 and 2017.","authors":"Adela Elena Popa","doi":"10.3233/WOR-210554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Important qualitative findings have accumulated on return to work after cancer from the perspective of various stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to critically appraise the evidence produced between 2008-2017 on several key stages of the return to work process against the key stakeholders identified in the articles included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was done on four databases to identify relevant papers. Papers were selected based on pre-defined selection criteria. A qualitative evidence synthesis was performed on the articles included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 articles were included in the analysis. Using the secondary thematic analysis, this study identified three categories of articles relative to the stakeholders included: articles focusing on patients' experience (n = 41); articles dealing with multiple stakeholders, including patients (n = 12); and articles drawing on stakeholders other than patients (n = 4). The analysis also revealed five key stages of the return to work process which follow a sequential order and provide a comprehensive image of the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is required on how employers view and are able to facilitate the return to work process after cancer. New forms of support must be planned and delivered by health professionals for patients who return on the labour market. The five stages model proposed in this study can help employers and policymakers to plan and deliver tailored legislation and guidance for RTW facilitation. All stakeholders must be further trained to embrace the idea that return to work is a complex process which continues long after the survivor returns to work.</p>","PeriodicalId":319034,"journal":{"name":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","volume":" ","pages":"1299-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Important qualitative findings have accumulated on return to work after cancer from the perspective of various stakeholders.

Objective: The aim of this paper was to critically appraise the evidence produced between 2008-2017 on several key stages of the return to work process against the key stakeholders identified in the articles included.

Methods: A systematic search was done on four databases to identify relevant papers. Papers were selected based on pre-defined selection criteria. A qualitative evidence synthesis was performed on the articles included.

Results: A total of 57 articles were included in the analysis. Using the secondary thematic analysis, this study identified three categories of articles relative to the stakeholders included: articles focusing on patients' experience (n = 41); articles dealing with multiple stakeholders, including patients (n = 12); and articles drawing on stakeholders other than patients (n = 4). The analysis also revealed five key stages of the return to work process which follow a sequential order and provide a comprehensive image of the process.

Conclusions: More research is required on how employers view and are able to facilitate the return to work process after cancer. New forms of support must be planned and delivered by health professionals for patients who return on the labour market. The five stages model proposed in this study can help employers and policymakers to plan and deliver tailored legislation and guidance for RTW facilitation. All stakeholders must be further trained to embrace the idea that return to work is a complex process which continues long after the survivor returns to work.

超越患者对癌症后重返工作岗位过程的看法:2008年至2017年发表的文章的定性证据综合。
背景:从各个利益相关者的角度来看,癌症后重返工作岗位的重要定性发现已经积累起来。目的:本文的目的是针对文章中确定的关键利益相关者,批判性地评估2008-2017年间在重返工作过程的几个关键阶段产生的证据。方法:系统检索4个数据库,检索相关文献。论文是根据预先定义的选择标准进行选择的。对纳入的文章进行定性证据综合。结果:共纳入57篇文献。利用次级主题分析,本研究确定了与利益相关者相关的三类文章:关注患者经历的文章(n = 41);涉及包括患者在内的多个利益相关者的文章(n = 12);以及涉及利益相关者而非患者的文章(n = 4)。分析还揭示了恢复工作过程的五个关键阶段,这些阶段遵循顺序,并提供了该过程的综合图像。结论:关于雇主如何看待并能够促进癌症后重返工作岗位的过程,需要进行更多的研究。保健专业人员必须为重返劳动力市场的患者规划和提供新形式的支助。本研究提出的五阶段模型可以帮助雇主和政策制定者规划和提供量身定制的RTW便利化立法和指导。必须对所有利益攸关方进行进一步培训,使其认识到重返工作岗位是一个复杂的过程,在幸存者重返工作岗位后仍将持续很长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信