Obstetric fistula in India: current scenario.

Shalini Singh, Nomita Chandhiok, Balwan Singh Dhillon
{"title":"Obstetric fistula in India: current scenario.","authors":"Shalini Singh,&nbsp;Nomita Chandhiok,&nbsp;Balwan Singh Dhillon","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":" ","pages":"1403-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1000-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: India lacks prevalence and incidence data on obstetric fistula, a near miss maternal mortality.

Methodology: Retrospective data were collected on obstetric fistula cases from hospital records of 24 tertiary care facilities during the period 2000-2006.

Results: Overall, 717 women underwent genital fistula repair, but medical records could be retrieved for only 401 (56%) cases. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal had more than 100 cases each, while Karnataka had none. Obstructed labor caused nearly 97% of genital fistulae while pelvic surgery and accidental trauma contributed to 1.5% cases each. Commonest type of fistula was genitourinary (86.6%), others included rectovaginal (12.1%) and both genitourinary and rectovaginal fistulae (1.2%). Fistula repair was attempted in 322 (83%) cases of whom 289 (89.71%) were successfully repaired.

Conclusions: There is a need for ongoing systematic data collection mechanism like a fistula registry that would provide facility-based prevalence and incidence, time trends, and changes in etiology of fistula. This information could be used for implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.

印度的产科瘘:目前的情况。
背景:印度缺乏关于产科瘘管病的流行率和发病率数据,这是一种几乎错过的孕产妇死亡率。方法:从2000-2006年期间24家三级保健机构的医院记录中收集了关于产科瘘病例的回顾性数据。结果:总体而言,717名妇女接受了生殖器瘘修复,但只有401例(56%)病例的医疗记录可以检索到。比哈尔邦、北方邦和西孟加拉邦各有100多例病例,而卡纳塔克邦没有。难产导致近97%的生殖器瘘,盆腔手术和意外创伤各占1.5%。最常见的瘘管类型为泌尿生殖系统瘘管(86.6%),其他包括直肠阴道瘘管(12.1%)和泌尿生殖系统和直肠阴道瘘管(1.2%)。322例(83%)患者尝试修复瘘管,其中289例(89.71%)成功修复。结论:需要持续系统的数据收集机制,如瘘登记,以提供基于设施的瘘的患病率和发病率,时间趋势和病因变化。这些信息可用于实施预防和治疗战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信