Comparison of innovative communication approaches in nutrition to promote and improve health literacy.

Q3 Medicine
Ulster Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-15
Hannah L Anderson, John E Moore, Beverley C Millar
{"title":"Comparison of innovative communication approaches in nutrition to promote and improve health literacy.","authors":"Hannah L Anderson,&nbsp;John E Moore,&nbsp;Beverley C Millar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The translation of scientific evidence into guidelines and advice is a fundamental aspect of scientific communication within nutrition and dietetics. For communication to be effective for all patients, health literacy (HL) must be considered, i.e. an individual's capacity to obtain, comprehend and utilise information to empower decision-making and promote their own health. HL levels are varied and difficult to judge on an individual basis and have not been quantified, thus not giving a population mean HL competency indication. It has been evidenced that most of the working age population in England cannot comprehend healthcare materials due to complexity, thereby promoting a need for agreed readability thresholds for written healthcare information. A wide range of modalities within dietetics are used to communicate to a varied audience with the primary form written, e.g. journal articles, plain language summaries and leaflets. Audio/visual and digital communications are increasing in dietetic care and welcomed by patients; however, the effectiveness of such approaches has not been studied thoroughly and digital exclusion remains a concern. Communication considering a patient's HL level leads to empowerment which is key to effective management of chronic diseases with a high treatment burden. Therefore; this review will focus on the importance of modalities used to communicate science in nutrition to ensure they are appropriate in relation to Health Literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38815,"journal":{"name":"Ulster Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/c1/umj-91-02-85.PMC9200103.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulster Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The translation of scientific evidence into guidelines and advice is a fundamental aspect of scientific communication within nutrition and dietetics. For communication to be effective for all patients, health literacy (HL) must be considered, i.e. an individual's capacity to obtain, comprehend and utilise information to empower decision-making and promote their own health. HL levels are varied and difficult to judge on an individual basis and have not been quantified, thus not giving a population mean HL competency indication. It has been evidenced that most of the working age population in England cannot comprehend healthcare materials due to complexity, thereby promoting a need for agreed readability thresholds for written healthcare information. A wide range of modalities within dietetics are used to communicate to a varied audience with the primary form written, e.g. journal articles, plain language summaries and leaflets. Audio/visual and digital communications are increasing in dietetic care and welcomed by patients; however, the effectiveness of such approaches has not been studied thoroughly and digital exclusion remains a concern. Communication considering a patient's HL level leads to empowerment which is key to effective management of chronic diseases with a high treatment burden. Therefore; this review will focus on the importance of modalities used to communicate science in nutrition to ensure they are appropriate in relation to Health Literacy.

Abstract Image

比较营养方面的创新传播方法,以促进和提高健康知识。
将科学证据转化为指导方针和建议是营养学和营养学科学交流的一个基本方面。为了使沟通对所有患者都有效,必须考虑健康素养(HL),即个人获得、理解和利用信息的能力,以增强决策能力并促进自身健康。HL水平各不相同,难以根据个人情况进行判断,并且尚未量化,因此无法给出总体平均HL能力指标。有证据表明,由于复杂性,英格兰大多数工作年龄人群无法理解医疗保健材料,从而促进了对书面医疗保健信息可读性阈值的需求。营养学中的一系列模式被用来与不同的受众交流,主要形式是书面的,例如期刊文章、通俗易懂的摘要和传单。音频/视频和数字通信在饮食护理中越来越多,受到患者的欢迎;然而,这些方法的有效性尚未得到彻底研究,数字排斥仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。考虑患者HL水平的沟通会带来赋权,这是有效管理高治疗负担慢性病的关键。因此这篇综述将重点关注用于传播营养科学的模式的重要性,以确保它们与健康素养相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ulster Medical Journal
Ulster Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信