{"title":"An Appropriate Response to the Black-Box Warning: Corrective, Barrier Repair Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Peter M Elias","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to years of sophisticated research on T cell function, many dermatologists have viewed atopic dermatitis (AD) largely as an inflammatory disorder of TH1/TH2 imbalance. Hence, therapy has largely consisted of topical immunomodulators and/or steroids. The imposition of \"black box\" warnings about the potential toxicity associated with prolonged use of the immunosuppressive drugs, tacrolimus 0.1% or 0.3% ointment (Protopic((R)), Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc., Deerfield, IL) and pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel((R)), Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), as well as legitimate concerns about the adverse side effects of potent topical steroids, has stimulated a search for alternate forms of therapy. Recent genetic studies point to the primary role of a defective barrier to water loss and microbial invasion in the provocation of AD, creating a rationale for 'barrier repair' therapy. This approach utilizes topical applications of specific combination of the three (3) epidermal lipids that comprise the epidermal permeability barrier in a ratio (ceramide-dominant) that corrects the biochemical abnormality in AD.1,2 We review here both recent concerns about the topical immunomodulators, as well as the rationale for barrier repair therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93638,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Dermatology","volume":"2 ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2749313/pdf/nihms99323.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to years of sophisticated research on T cell function, many dermatologists have viewed atopic dermatitis (AD) largely as an inflammatory disorder of TH1/TH2 imbalance. Hence, therapy has largely consisted of topical immunomodulators and/or steroids. The imposition of "black box" warnings about the potential toxicity associated with prolonged use of the immunosuppressive drugs, tacrolimus 0.1% or 0.3% ointment (Protopic((R)), Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc., Deerfield, IL) and pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel((R)), Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), as well as legitimate concerns about the adverse side effects of potent topical steroids, has stimulated a search for alternate forms of therapy. Recent genetic studies point to the primary role of a defective barrier to water loss and microbial invasion in the provocation of AD, creating a rationale for 'barrier repair' therapy. This approach utilizes topical applications of specific combination of the three (3) epidermal lipids that comprise the epidermal permeability barrier in a ratio (ceramide-dominant) that corrects the biochemical abnormality in AD.1,2 We review here both recent concerns about the topical immunomodulators, as well as the rationale for barrier repair therapy.