The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research.

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS
Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little, Ruth Faden
{"title":"The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research.","authors":"Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little, Ruth Faden","doi":"10.1353/ijf.0.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though much progress has been made on inclusion of non-pregnant women in research, thoughtful discussion about including pregnant women has lagged behind. We outline resulting knowledge gaps and their costs and then highlight four reasons why ethically we are obliged to confront the challenges of including pregnant women in clinical research. These are: the need for effective treatment for women during pregnancy, fetal safety, harm from the reticence to prescribe potentially beneficial medication, and the broader issues of justice and access to benefits of research participation. Going forward requires shifting the burden of justification from inclusion to exclusion and developing an adequate ethical framework that specifies suitable justifications for excluding pregnant women from research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747530/pdf/nihms75438.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ijf.0.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though much progress has been made on inclusion of non-pregnant women in research, thoughtful discussion about including pregnant women has lagged behind. We outline resulting knowledge gaps and their costs and then highlight four reasons why ethically we are obliged to confront the challenges of including pregnant women in clinical research. These are: the need for effective treatment for women during pregnancy, fetal safety, harm from the reticence to prescribe potentially beneficial medication, and the broader issues of justice and access to benefits of research participation. Going forward requires shifting the burden of justification from inclusion to exclusion and developing an adequate ethical framework that specifies suitable justifications for excluding pregnant women from research.

第二波:让孕妇负责任地参与研究。
尽管在将非孕妇纳入研究方面已经取得了很大进展,但有关将孕妇纳入研究的深思熟虑的讨论却一直滞后。我们概述了由此产生的知识差距及其代价,然后强调了我们在伦理上有义务应对将孕妇纳入临床研究的挑战的四个原因。这四个原因是:妊娠期妇女需要有效的治疗、胎儿安全、拒绝开具可能有益的药物所造成的伤害,以及参与研究的公正性和获益机会等更广泛的问题。要取得进展,就必须将说明理由的责任从纳入转向排除,并制定适当的伦理框架,明确规定将孕妇排除在研究之外的适当理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信