Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection - from bench studies to clinical evidence.

Andrea Lisotti, Pietro Fusaroli, Bertrand Napoleon, Anna Cominardi, Rocco Maurizio Zagari
{"title":"Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection - from bench studies to clinical evidence.","authors":"Andrea Lisotti,&nbsp;Pietro Fusaroli,&nbsp;Bertrand Napoleon,&nbsp;Anna Cominardi,&nbsp;Rocco Maurizio Zagari","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several strategies have been implemented to reduce or abolish the life-threatening risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related multidrug-resistant infections due to duodenoscopes contaminations; among those strategies, serial microbiologic tests, thorough reprocessing schedules, and use of removable scope cap have been adopted, but the potential cross-infection risk was not eliminated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review available evidence in the field of single-use duodenoscopes (SUD) use for ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An overview on ongoing clinical studies was also performed to delineate which data will become available in the next future.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One bench comparative study and four clinical trials performed with EXALT model-D (Boston Scientific Corp., United States) have been identified. Of them, one is a randomized controlled trial, while the other three studies are prospective single-arm, cross-over studies. Pooled technical success rate (4 studies, 368 patients) was 92.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-95.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>: 11.8%]. Pooled serious adverse event (4 studies, 381 patients) rate was 5.9% [3.7%-8.5%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>: 0.0%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although few clinical trials are available, evidence is concordant in identifying an absolute feasibility and safety and feasibility for SUD use for ERCP. The expertise and quality of evidence in this field are going to be improved by further large clinical trials;data on cost-effectiveness and environmental impact will be needed for a worldwide spread of SUD use for ERCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23729,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"12 3","pages":"122-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/ff/WJM-12-122.PMC9157629.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several strategies have been implemented to reduce or abolish the life-threatening risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related multidrug-resistant infections due to duodenoscopes contaminations; among those strategies, serial microbiologic tests, thorough reprocessing schedules, and use of removable scope cap have been adopted, but the potential cross-infection risk was not eliminated.

Aim: To review available evidence in the field of single-use duodenoscopes (SUD) use for ERCP.

Methods: An overview on ongoing clinical studies was also performed to delineate which data will become available in the next future.

Results: One bench comparative study and four clinical trials performed with EXALT model-D (Boston Scientific Corp., United States) have been identified. Of them, one is a randomized controlled trial, while the other three studies are prospective single-arm, cross-over studies. Pooled technical success rate (4 studies, 368 patients) was 92.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-95.5; I 2: 11.8%]. Pooled serious adverse event (4 studies, 381 patients) rate was 5.9% [3.7%-8.5%; I 2: 0.0%].

Conclusion: Although few clinical trials are available, evidence is concordant in identifying an absolute feasibility and safety and feasibility for SUD use for ERCP. The expertise and quality of evidence in this field are going to be improved by further large clinical trials;data on cost-effectiveness and environmental impact will be needed for a worldwide spread of SUD use for ERCP.

Abstract Image

一次性使用十二指肠镜预防内窥镜逆行胆管造影相关交叉感染——从实验研究到临床证据
背景:为了减少或消除内镜下逆行胆管造影(ERCP)相关的多重耐药感染因十二指肠镜污染而危及生命的风险,已经实施了几种策略;在这些策略中,采取了一系列微生物学检测、彻底的再处理计划和使用可拆卸的镜盖,但潜在的交叉感染风险并未消除。目的:回顾一次性十二指肠镜(SUD)用于ERCP的现有证据。方法:对正在进行的临床研究进行概述,以描述哪些数据将在未来可用。结果:一项台架比较研究和四项使用EXALT模型d(波士顿科学公司,美国)进行的临床试验已经确定。其中一项为随机对照试验,另外三项为前瞻性单臂交叉研究。合并技术成功率(4项研究,368例患者)为92.9%[95%可信区间(CI): 89.9-95.5;[11:11 .8%]。合并严重不良事件(4项研究,381例)发生率为5.9% [3.7%-8.5%;[2:0 .0%]。结论:虽然临床试验很少,但在确定ERCP使用SUD的绝对可行性、安全性和可行性方面证据是一致的。进一步的大型临床试验将提高这一领域的专业知识和证据的质量;为了在全球范围内推广ERCP使用SUD,将需要有关成本效益和环境影响的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信