Assessment of diagnostic capacity and decision-making based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association ultrasound classification system.

Luis-Mauricio Hurtado-Lopez, Alfredo Carrillo-Muñoz, Felipe-Rafael Zaldivar-Ramirez, Erich Otto Paul Basurto-Kuba, Blanca-Estela Monroy-Lozano
{"title":"Assessment of diagnostic capacity and decision-making based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association ultrasound classification system.","authors":"Luis-Mauricio Hurtado-Lopez,&nbsp;Alfredo Carrillo-Muñoz,&nbsp;Felipe-Rafael Zaldivar-Ramirez,&nbsp;Erich Otto Paul Basurto-Kuba,&nbsp;Blanca-Estela Monroy-Lozano","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the American Thyroid Association (ATA) ultrasound (US) classification system for the initial assessment of thyroid nodules to determine if it indeed facilitates clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of the ATA US classification system for the initial assessment of thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the PRISMA statement for diagnostic test accuracy, we selected articles that evaluated the 2015 ATA US pattern guidelines using a diagnostic gold standard. We analyzed these cases using traditional diagnostic parameters, as well as the threshold approach to clinical decision-making and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 13 articles with 8445 thyroid nodules, which were classified according to 2015 ATA patterns. Of these, 46.62% were malignant. No cancer was found in any of the ATA benign pattern nodules. The Bayesian analysis post-test probability for cancer in each classification was: (1) Very-low suspicion, 0.85%; (2) Low, 2.6%; (3) Intermediate, 6.7%; and (4) High, 40.9%. The net benefit (NB), expressed as avoided interventions, indicated that the highest capacity to avoid unnecessary fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the patterns that we studied was 42, 31, 35, and 43 of every 100 FNABs. The NB calculation for a probability threshold of 11% for each of the ATA suspicion patterns studied is less than that of performing FNAB on all nodules.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These three types of analysis have shown that only the ATA high-suspicion diagnostic pattern is clinically useful, in which case, FNAB should be performed. However, the curve decision analysis has demonstrated that using the ATA US risk patterns to decide which patients need FNAB does not provide a greater benefit than performing FNAB on all thyroid nodules. Therefore, it is likely that a better way to approach the assessment of thyroid nodules would be to perform FNAB on all non-cystic nodules, as the present analysis has shown the ATA risk patterns do not provide an adequate clinical decision-making framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":23729,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"12 3","pages":"148-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/06/WJM-12-148.PMC9157633.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the American Thyroid Association (ATA) ultrasound (US) classification system for the initial assessment of thyroid nodules to determine if it indeed facilitates clinical decision-making.

Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of the ATA US classification system for the initial assessment of thyroid nodules.

Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA statement for diagnostic test accuracy, we selected articles that evaluated the 2015 ATA US pattern guidelines using a diagnostic gold standard. We analyzed these cases using traditional diagnostic parameters, as well as the threshold approach to clinical decision-making and decision curve analysis.

Results: We reviewed 13 articles with 8445 thyroid nodules, which were classified according to 2015 ATA patterns. Of these, 46.62% were malignant. No cancer was found in any of the ATA benign pattern nodules. The Bayesian analysis post-test probability for cancer in each classification was: (1) Very-low suspicion, 0.85%; (2) Low, 2.6%; (3) Intermediate, 6.7%; and (4) High, 40.9%. The net benefit (NB), expressed as avoided interventions, indicated that the highest capacity to avoid unnecessary fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the patterns that we studied was 42, 31, 35, and 43 of every 100 FNABs. The NB calculation for a probability threshold of 11% for each of the ATA suspicion patterns studied is less than that of performing FNAB on all nodules.

Conclusion: These three types of analysis have shown that only the ATA high-suspicion diagnostic pattern is clinically useful, in which case, FNAB should be performed. However, the curve decision analysis has demonstrated that using the ATA US risk patterns to decide which patients need FNAB does not provide a greater benefit than performing FNAB on all thyroid nodules. Therefore, it is likely that a better way to approach the assessment of thyroid nodules would be to perform FNAB on all non-cystic nodules, as the present analysis has shown the ATA risk patterns do not provide an adequate clinical decision-making framework.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于2015年美国甲状腺协会超声分类系统的诊断能力评估与决策。
背景:本研究评估了美国甲状腺协会(ATA)超声(US)分类系统对甲状腺结节的初步评估,以确定它是否确实有助于临床决策。目的:对ATA US分类系统对甲状腺结节初步评估的诊断价值进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:根据PRISMA关于诊断测试准确性的声明,我们选择了使用诊断金标准评估2015年ATA美国模式指南的文章。我们使用传统的诊断参数,以及阈值法进行临床决策和决策曲线分析。结果:我们回顾了13篇文章,共8445例甲状腺结节,并根据2015年ATA模式进行了分类。其中,46.62%为恶性。所有ATA良性结节均未见癌。各分类中对癌症的贝叶斯分析后验概率为:(1)极低怀疑,0.85%;(2)低,2.6%;(3)中级,6.7%;(4)高,40.9%。净收益(NB)表示为避免干预,表明在我们研究的模式中,避免不必要的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)的最高能力为每100个FNAB中有42、31、35和43个。对于所研究的每个ATA怀疑模式,NB计算的概率阈值为11%,低于对所有结节进行FNAB的计算。结论:以上三种分析均表明,只有ATA高怀疑诊断模式具有临床应用价值,此时应行FNAB。然而,曲线决策分析表明,使用ATA US风险模式来决定哪些患者需要FNAB并不比对所有甲状腺结节进行FNAB提供更大的益处。因此,评估甲状腺结节的更好方法可能是对所有非囊性结节进行FNAB,因为目前的分析表明ATA风险模式不能提供足够的临床决策框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信