Satisfaction and Concerns with Telemedicine Endocrine Care of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-03-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0053
Rahat Ahmed, Margaret Greenfield, Christopher P Morley, Marisa Desimone
{"title":"Satisfaction and Concerns with Telemedicine Endocrine Care of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.","authors":"Rahat Ahmed,&nbsp;Margaret Greenfield,&nbsp;Christopher P Morley,&nbsp;Marisa Desimone","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with chronic health conditions are at high risk for severe COVID-19 infections, making telemedicine for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) particularly relevant. There are limited data regarding provider perspectives on caring for patients with CF using telemedicine, particularly for those with CFRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were administered to patients with CF (with and without CFRD) and to adult and pediatric endocrinologists who specialize in CF. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture; <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare total mean scores of Likert scale questions. The differences in responses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Variables were assessed for normality and we performed the Mann-Whitney test. No change in the results of the hypothesis test was found. All results were analyzed using SPSS version 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (<i>n</i> = 9 CFRD) and 21 providers responded. Both groups reported high satisfaction with telemedicine overall (83.3%; 71.4%), convenience (94.4%; 85.7%), and adequate time during the visit (94.4%; 76.2%), and the majority would recommend telemedicine to others (94.4%; 95.2%). Lack of in-person examination components was of more concern to providers than patients: height/weight (<i>p</i> < 0.001), vitals (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in provider perception in treatment of CFRD compared to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Common themes of open-ended questions included ease in attending telemedicine appointments (patients) and decrease in \"no shows\" (providers).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine was high. The lack of typical components of face-to-face visits was more concerning for providers when compared to patients. Provider concern regarding lack of components specific to diabetes was similar regarding CFRD and T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049818/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with chronic health conditions are at high risk for severe COVID-19 infections, making telemedicine for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) particularly relevant. There are limited data regarding provider perspectives on caring for patients with CF using telemedicine, particularly for those with CFRD.

Methods: Surveys were administered to patients with CF (with and without CFRD) and to adult and pediatric endocrinologists who specialize in CF. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture; t-tests were used to compare total mean scores of Likert scale questions. The differences in responses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Variables were assessed for normality and we performed the Mann-Whitney test. No change in the results of the hypothesis test was found. All results were analyzed using SPSS version 27.

Results: Eighteen patients (n = 9 CFRD) and 21 providers responded. Both groups reported high satisfaction with telemedicine overall (83.3%; 71.4%), convenience (94.4%; 85.7%), and adequate time during the visit (94.4%; 76.2%), and the majority would recommend telemedicine to others (94.4%; 95.2%). Lack of in-person examination components was of more concern to providers than patients: height/weight (p < 0.001), vitals (p < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (p < 0.001). There was no difference in provider perception in treatment of CFRD compared to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Common themes of open-ended questions included ease in attending telemedicine appointments (patients) and decrease in "no shows" (providers).

Discussion: Patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine was high. The lack of typical components of face-to-face visits was more concerning for providers when compared to patients. Provider concern regarding lack of components specific to diabetes was similar regarding CFRD and T1D.

囊性纤维化患者远程医疗内分泌护理的满意度及关注。
慢性疾病患者是COVID-19严重感染的高危人群,因此对囊性纤维化(CF)和囊性纤维化相关性糖尿病(CFRD)患者进行远程医疗尤为重要。关于使用远程医疗照顾CF患者的提供者观点的数据有限,特别是对于那些患有CFRD的患者。方法:对CF患者(伴有或不伴有CFRD)以及CF专业的成人和儿科内分泌学家进行调查。使用研究电子数据采集收集数据;采用t检验比较李克特量表问题的总平均得分。反应的差异采用单向方差分析,然后采用Tukey's Honest显著差异检验。对变量进行正态性评估,并进行Mann-Whitney检验。假设检验的结果没有变化。所有结果均采用SPSS第27版进行分析。结果:18名患者(n = 9名CFRD)和21名提供者有反应。两组受访者对远程医疗的总体满意度都很高(83.3%;71.4%),便利(94.4%;85.7%),访问期间有足够的时间(94.4%;76.2%),大多数人会向他人推荐远程医疗(94.4%;95.2%)。医生比病人更关心的是缺乏面对面的检查内容:身高/体重(p p p)讨论:病人和医生对远程医疗的满意度很高。与患者相比,缺乏面对面访问的典型组成部分对提供者来说更令人担忧。供应商对缺乏糖尿病特异性成分的担忧与CFRD和T1D相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信