Employer-Sponsored Health Centers Provide Access to Integrated Care via a Hybrid of Virtual and In-Person Visits.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2021-11-02 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2021.0027
Divya K Madhusudhan, Sharon A Watts, Daniel J Lord, Fiona Ding, David C Lawrence, Austin Sheldon, James Leonard, Dena M Bravata
{"title":"Employer-Sponsored Health Centers Provide Access to Integrated Care via a Hybrid of Virtual and In-Person Visits.","authors":"Divya K Madhusudhan, Sharon A Watts, Daniel J Lord, Fiona Ding, David C Lawrence, Austin Sheldon, James Leonard, Dena M Bravata","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Since the explosion of telemedicine resulting from the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, employers have been particularly interested in virtual primary care as a novel means of expanding primary care services. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of integrated care delivered both in-person and virtually at employer-sponsored health centers nationwide. The key outcomes of this analysis were the proportion of all care delivered in-person and virtually by clinical discipline, the types of care and member satisfaction for care delivered in-person and virtually, and a description of the use of multiple clinical disciplines by the employee population. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective observational study comparing health services utilization of primary care, behavioral health, and physical medicine services both in-person and virtually in employer-sponsored clinics between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. <b>Results:</b> Of the 331,967 visits with employer-sponsored health center staff, 63% were in-person and 37% were delivered virtually. Most visits were for primary care services (59.5%), with physical medicine visits and behavioral health visits accounting for 25.1% and 15.4%, respectively. Whereas the preponderance of behavioral health visits were virtual visits (72.5%), less than a quarter (18.2%) of physical medicine visits were delivered virtually. 19.6% of patients were seen by more than two clinical disciplines and 2.6% were seen by three different disciplines. Overall, patients were highly likely to recommend the health center across both modalities (Net Promoter Score 89.1 for in-person care and 88.4 for virtual care). <b>Discussion:</b> The future of employer-sponsored integrated team-based care may require a hybrid approach that can lean heavily on virtual visits but requires the infrastructure necessary for in-person care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"247-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the explosion of telemedicine resulting from the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, employers have been particularly interested in virtual primary care as a novel means of expanding primary care services. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of integrated care delivered both in-person and virtually at employer-sponsored health centers nationwide. The key outcomes of this analysis were the proportion of all care delivered in-person and virtually by clinical discipline, the types of care and member satisfaction for care delivered in-person and virtually, and a description of the use of multiple clinical disciplines by the employee population. Methods: Retrospective observational study comparing health services utilization of primary care, behavioral health, and physical medicine services both in-person and virtually in employer-sponsored clinics between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Results: Of the 331,967 visits with employer-sponsored health center staff, 63% were in-person and 37% were delivered virtually. Most visits were for primary care services (59.5%), with physical medicine visits and behavioral health visits accounting for 25.1% and 15.4%, respectively. Whereas the preponderance of behavioral health visits were virtual visits (72.5%), less than a quarter (18.2%) of physical medicine visits were delivered virtually. 19.6% of patients were seen by more than two clinical disciplines and 2.6% were seen by three different disciplines. Overall, patients were highly likely to recommend the health center across both modalities (Net Promoter Score 89.1 for in-person care and 88.4 for virtual care). Discussion: The future of employer-sponsored integrated team-based care may require a hybrid approach that can lean heavily on virtual visits but requires the infrastructure necessary for in-person care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雇主赞助的医疗中心通过虚拟和亲自就诊相结合的方式提供综合医疗服务。
背景:自 SARS-CoV2 大流行引发远程医疗的爆炸性发展以来,雇主们对虚拟初级保健这一扩大初级保健服务的新手段尤为感兴趣。本研究的目的是描述一种在全国范围内由雇主赞助的医疗中心以面对面和虚拟的方式提供综合医疗服务的模式。这项分析的主要结果是:按临床学科划分的所有面对面和虚拟提供的医疗服务的比例、医疗服务的类型和会员对面对面和虚拟提供的医疗服务的满意度,以及对员工群体使用多种临床学科的描述。方法:回顾性观察研究,比较 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间雇主赞助的诊所中初级保健、行为健康和物理医疗服务的亲自和虚拟使用情况。结果:在雇主赞助的医疗中心工作人员提供的 331,967 次就诊中,63% 是面对面就诊,37% 是虚拟就诊。大多数就诊都是为了获得初级保健服务(59.5%),物理医疗就诊和行为健康就诊分别占 25.1% 和 15.4%。行为健康就诊主要是虚拟就诊(72.5%),而物理医疗就诊只有不到四分之一(18.2%)是虚拟就诊。19.6%的患者接受了两个以上临床学科的诊疗,2.6%的患者接受了三个不同学科的诊疗。总体而言,无论采用哪种方式,患者都极有可能推荐该医疗中心(现场医疗服务的净促进者得分为 89.1,虚拟医疗服务的净促进者得分为 88.4)。讨论:雇主赞助的基于团队的综合护理的未来可能需要一种混合方法,这种方法可以在很大程度上依赖于虚拟就诊,但需要亲自就诊所需的基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信