Rapid Thrombolysis Protocol: Results from a Before-and-after Study.

IF 1.5
Ankur Verma, Shivani Sarda, Sanjay Jaiswal, Amit Batra, Meghna Haldar, Wasil R Sheikh, Amit Vishen, Palak Khanna, Rinkey Ahuja, Abbas A Khatai
{"title":"Rapid Thrombolysis Protocol: Results from a Before-and-after Study.","authors":"Ankur Verma,&nbsp;Shivani Sarda,&nbsp;Sanjay Jaiswal,&nbsp;Amit Batra,&nbsp;Meghna Haldar,&nbsp;Wasil R Sheikh,&nbsp;Amit Vishen,&nbsp;Palak Khanna,&nbsp;Rinkey Ahuja,&nbsp;Abbas A Khatai","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours from time of onset has proven benefit in stroke. Universal standard for the door-to-needle (DTN) time is within 60 minutes from the time of arrival of patients to the emergency department. Our rapid thrombolysis protocol (RTPr) was developed with an aim to reduce the DTN time to a minimum by modifying our stroke post-intervention processes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This before-and-after study was conducted at a single center on patients who received intravenous thrombolysis in the emergency department. Consecutive patients who were thrombolysed using our RTPr (post-intervention group) were compared to the pre-intervention group who were thrombolysed before the implementation of the protocol. The primary outcomes were DTN time, time to recovery, and modified ranking score (mRS) on discharge. Secondary outcomes were mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients were enrolled in each group. Mean DTN time in pre- and post-intervention group was 56.15 minutes (95% CI 49.98-62.31) and 34.91 minutes (95% CI 29.64-40.17) (<i>p</i> <0.001), respectively. In pre-intervention and post-intervention groups, 43.24% (95% CI 32.57-54.59) and 41.89% (95% CI 31.32-53.26) patients, respectively, showed neurological recovery in 24 hours. About 36.49% (95% CI 26.44-47.87) in pre-intervention group and 54.05% (95% CI 42.78-64.93) in post-intervention group had discharge mRS 0-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RTPr can be adapted by clinicians and hospitals to bring down the DTN times and improve outcomes for stroke patients.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Verma A, Sarda S, Jaiswal S, Batra A, Haldar M, Sheikh WR, <i>et al</i>. Rapid Thrombolysis Protocol: Results from a Before-and-after Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):549-554.</p>","PeriodicalId":520643,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"549-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/5f/ijccm-26-549.PMC9160610.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours from time of onset has proven benefit in stroke. Universal standard for the door-to-needle (DTN) time is within 60 minutes from the time of arrival of patients to the emergency department. Our rapid thrombolysis protocol (RTPr) was developed with an aim to reduce the DTN time to a minimum by modifying our stroke post-intervention processes.

Materials and methods: This before-and-after study was conducted at a single center on patients who received intravenous thrombolysis in the emergency department. Consecutive patients who were thrombolysed using our RTPr (post-intervention group) were compared to the pre-intervention group who were thrombolysed before the implementation of the protocol. The primary outcomes were DTN time, time to recovery, and modified ranking score (mRS) on discharge. Secondary outcomes were mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay.

Results: Seventy-four patients were enrolled in each group. Mean DTN time in pre- and post-intervention group was 56.15 minutes (95% CI 49.98-62.31) and 34.91 minutes (95% CI 29.64-40.17) (p <0.001), respectively. In pre-intervention and post-intervention groups, 43.24% (95% CI 32.57-54.59) and 41.89% (95% CI 31.32-53.26) patients, respectively, showed neurological recovery in 24 hours. About 36.49% (95% CI 26.44-47.87) in pre-intervention group and 54.05% (95% CI 42.78-64.93) in post-intervention group had discharge mRS 0-2.

Conclusion: The RTPr can be adapted by clinicians and hospitals to bring down the DTN times and improve outcomes for stroke patients.

How to cite this article: Verma A, Sarda S, Jaiswal S, Batra A, Haldar M, Sheikh WR, et al. Rapid Thrombolysis Protocol: Results from a Before-and-after Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):549-554.

Abstract Image

快速溶栓方案:前后对比研究的结果。
目的:在发病后4.5小时内静脉溶栓已被证实对脑卒中有益。从门到针(DTN)时间的通用标准是从病人到达急诊科起60分钟内。我们的快速溶栓方案(RTPr)旨在通过修改卒中干预后流程将DTN时间减少到最小。材料与方法:本研究在单个中心对急诊静脉溶栓患者进行了前后对照研究。将连续使用RTPr溶栓的患者(干预后组)与实施方案前溶栓的干预前组进行比较。主要观察指标为DTN时间、恢复时间和出院时改良评分(mRS)。次要结局是死亡率、症状性脑出血、住院和重症监护病房的住院时间。结果:每组74例患者入组。干预前后两组患者的平均DTN时间分别为56.15 min (95% CI 49.98 ~ 62.31)和34.91 min (95% CI 29.64 ~ 40.17)。(p)结论:RTPr可被临床医生和医院采用,减少脑卒中患者的DTN时间,改善预后。本文引用方式:Verma A, Sarda S, Jaiswal S, Batra A, Haldar M, Sheikh WR等。快速溶栓方案:前后对比研究的结果。中华检验医学杂志;2009;26(5):549-554。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信