Clinical Profile of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Developing Pulmonary Barotrauma on Mechanical Ventilation.

IF 1.5
Ketan V Kargirwar, Darshana Rathod, Vivek Kumar, Mayur Patel, Mehul Shah, Himanshu Choudhury, Kavita Shalia
{"title":"Clinical Profile of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Developing Pulmonary Barotrauma on Mechanical Ventilation.","authors":"Ketan V Kargirwar,&nbsp;Darshana Rathod,&nbsp;Vivek Kumar,&nbsp;Mayur Patel,&nbsp;Mehul Shah,&nbsp;Himanshu Choudhury,&nbsp;Kavita Shalia","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on clinical profile and outcomes of patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) who developed pulmonary barotrauma (PBT) in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In a retrospective observational study, all SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients admitted from March 28, 2020, to August 31, 2020, at Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Center and Seven Hills Hospital (Reliance Facility), Mumbai, India, of 18 years and above on MV and developed PBT, were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 SARS-CoV-2 patients of 45 on MV (31.0%) developed PBT of 1,029 hospitalized. All patients were male and divided as per admission into PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (P/F) ≤100 (median 80) and P/F >100 (median 222) group. Pneumothorax developed in seven and six cases of P/F ≤100 and P/F >100 groups, respectively. Three patients in each group developed subcutaneous emphysema, while four developed pneumomediastinum in P/F >100 group. Twelve patients (7, P/F ≤100, and 5, P/F >100) were on invasive, while two (P/F >100) were on noninvasive MV. The mean P/F on the day of PBT was reduced by 27.5 and 65.3%, while peak inspiratory pressure was elevated with a median of 36 and 28 cm H<sub>2</sub>O in P/F ≤100 and P/F >100 groups, respectively. The median highest tidal volume (420 mL), positive-end expiratory pressure (8 vs 6 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) on the day of PBT, and length of hospital stay (11 vs 25 days) did not differ between two groups. Survival was 28.6% (4/14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring MV with PBT had poor outcomes. Clinicians should be vigilant about the diagnosis of PBT.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kargirwar KV, Rathod D, Kumar V, Patel M, Shah M, Choudhury H, <i>et al</i>. Clinical Profile of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Developing Pulmonary Barotrauma on Mechanical Ventilation. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):613-618.</p>","PeriodicalId":520643,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"613-618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/d8/ijccm-26-613.PMC9160609.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: There is limited information on clinical profile and outcomes of patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) who developed pulmonary barotrauma (PBT) in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Patients and methods: In a retrospective observational study, all SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients admitted from March 28, 2020, to August 31, 2020, at Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Center and Seven Hills Hospital (Reliance Facility), Mumbai, India, of 18 years and above on MV and developed PBT, were included.

Results: A total of 14 SARS-CoV-2 patients of 45 on MV (31.0%) developed PBT of 1,029 hospitalized. All patients were male and divided as per admission into PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ≤100 (median 80) and P/F >100 (median 222) group. Pneumothorax developed in seven and six cases of P/F ≤100 and P/F >100 groups, respectively. Three patients in each group developed subcutaneous emphysema, while four developed pneumomediastinum in P/F >100 group. Twelve patients (7, P/F ≤100, and 5, P/F >100) were on invasive, while two (P/F >100) were on noninvasive MV. The mean P/F on the day of PBT was reduced by 27.5 and 65.3%, while peak inspiratory pressure was elevated with a median of 36 and 28 cm H2O in P/F ≤100 and P/F >100 groups, respectively. The median highest tidal volume (420 mL), positive-end expiratory pressure (8 vs 6 cm H2O) on the day of PBT, and length of hospital stay (11 vs 25 days) did not differ between two groups. Survival was 28.6% (4/14).

Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring MV with PBT had poor outcomes. Clinicians should be vigilant about the diagnosis of PBT.

How to cite this article: Kargirwar KV, Rathod D, Kumar V, Patel M, Shah M, Choudhury H, et al. Clinical Profile of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Developing Pulmonary Barotrauma on Mechanical Ventilation. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):613-618.

Abstract Image

重症急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型感染机械通气并发肺气压损伤的临床分析
背景:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)感染后发生肺气压损伤(PBT)的机械通气患者的临床概况和预后信息有限。患者和方法:在一项回顾性观察研究中,纳入了2020年3月28日至2020年8月31日在印度孟买Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Center和Seven Hills Hospital (Reliance Facility)住院的所有18岁及以上的MV和发展中的PBT患者。结果:1029例住院患者中,SARS-CoV-2患者14例,45例(31.0%)发生PBT。所有患者均为男性,根据入院情况分为PaO2/FiO2 (P/F)≤100(中位80)和P/F >100(中位222)组。P/F≤100组发生气胸7例,P/F >100组发生气胸6例。P/F >100组出现纵隔气肿4例,两组出现皮下气肿3例。有创MV组7例(P/F≤100),有创MV组5例(P/F >100),无创MV组2例(P/F >100)。P/F≤100组和P/F >100组PBT当日平均P/F降低27.5%和65.3%,峰值吸气压力升高,中位数分别为36和28 cm H2O。PBT当天的最高潮气量中位数(420 mL)、呼气末正压(8 vs 6 cm H2O)和住院时间(11 vs 25天)在两组之间没有差异。生存率为28.6%(4/14)。结论:SARS-CoV-2合并PBT需MV的患者预后较差。临床医生应警惕PBT的诊断。如何引用本文:Kargirwar KV, Rathod, Kumar V, Patel M, Shah M, Choudhury H,等。重症急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型感染机械通气并发肺气压损伤的临床分析中华检验医学杂志;2009;26(5):613-618。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书