Comparing Important and Well-documented Potential Drug-Drug Interactions between Emergency, Medical, and Surgical ICUs of a Respiratory Referral Center.

IF 1.5
Zeinab Hosseinpoor, Behrooz Farzanegan, Shadi Baniasadi
{"title":"Comparing Important and Well-documented Potential Drug-Drug Interactions between Emergency, Medical, and Surgical ICUs of a Respiratory Referral Center.","authors":"Zeinab Hosseinpoor,&nbsp;Behrooz Farzanegan,&nbsp;Shadi Baniasadi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is one of the major healthcare challenges in intensive care units (ICUs). The prevalence of DDIs and interacting drug pairs may vary between different types of ICUs. This study aimed to compare the frequency and nature of important and well-documented potential DDIs (pDDIs) in three types of ICUs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted in medical (M), surgical (S), and emergency (E) ICUs of a tertiary referral center for respiratory diseases. A pharmacist checked the patients' files three days in a week for 6 months. The pDDIs were identified using the Lexi-Interact database. Interactions with a severity rating of D (modify regimen) and X (avoid combination) and with a reliability rating of good and excellent were considered important and well-documented. These pDDIs were evaluated in terms of drug combinations, mechanisms of interaction, and clinical management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-nine patients admitted to MICU, SICU, and EICU were included in the study. The percentage of patients who experienced at least one important and well-documented pDDI was 18.8% in MICU, 11.1% in SICU, and 11.8% in EICU. The most common drug pairs causing important and well-documented interactions were atracurium + hydrocortisone in MICU, meropenem + valproic acid in MICU and EICU, and aspirin + warfarin in SICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study shows different frequency and nature of pDDIs between three types of ICUs. We recommend conducting similar studies in other settings to develop evidence-based guidance on clinically relevant pDDIs in different types of ICUs.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Hosseinpoor Z, Farzanegan B, Baniasadi S. Comparing Important and Well-documented Potential Drug-Drug Interactions between Emergency, Medical, and Surgical ICUs of a Respiratory Referral Center. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):574-578.</p>","PeriodicalId":520643,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"574-578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/13/ijccm-26-574.PMC9160617.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is one of the major healthcare challenges in intensive care units (ICUs). The prevalence of DDIs and interacting drug pairs may vary between different types of ICUs. This study aimed to compare the frequency and nature of important and well-documented potential DDIs (pDDIs) in three types of ICUs.

Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted in medical (M), surgical (S), and emergency (E) ICUs of a tertiary referral center for respiratory diseases. A pharmacist checked the patients' files three days in a week for 6 months. The pDDIs were identified using the Lexi-Interact database. Interactions with a severity rating of D (modify regimen) and X (avoid combination) and with a reliability rating of good and excellent were considered important and well-documented. These pDDIs were evaluated in terms of drug combinations, mechanisms of interaction, and clinical management.

Results: One hundred eighty-nine patients admitted to MICU, SICU, and EICU were included in the study. The percentage of patients who experienced at least one important and well-documented pDDI was 18.8% in MICU, 11.1% in SICU, and 11.8% in EICU. The most common drug pairs causing important and well-documented interactions were atracurium + hydrocortisone in MICU, meropenem + valproic acid in MICU and EICU, and aspirin + warfarin in SICU.

Conclusion: The current study shows different frequency and nature of pDDIs between three types of ICUs. We recommend conducting similar studies in other settings to develop evidence-based guidance on clinically relevant pDDIs in different types of ICUs.

How to cite this article: Hosseinpoor Z, Farzanegan B, Baniasadi S. Comparing Important and Well-documented Potential Drug-Drug Interactions between Emergency, Medical, and Surgical ICUs of a Respiratory Referral Center. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):574-578.

比较呼吸转诊中心急诊、内科和外科icu之间重要的和充分记录的潜在药物-药物相互作用。
药物-药物相互作用(DDI)是重症监护病房(icu)的主要医疗挑战之一。不同类型icu的ddi患病率和相互作用药物对可能有所不同。本研究旨在比较三种icu中重要且有充分记录的潜在ddi (pddi)的频率和性质。材料和方法:在一家三级呼吸道疾病转诊中心的内科(M)、外科(S)和急诊(E) icu中进行了一项前瞻性研究。药剂师在6个月的时间里每周三天检查病人的档案。使用lex - interact数据库确定pddi。与严重程度等级为D(修改方案)和X(避免联合用药)以及可靠性等级为良好和优秀的相互作用被认为是重要的和有充分记录的。根据药物组合、相互作用机制和临床管理对这些pddi进行评估。结果:189例MICU、SICU和EICU患者纳入研究。经历至少一次重要且记录良好的pDDI的患者比例在MICU为18.8%,在SICU为11.1%,在EICU为11.8%。引起重要相互作用的最常见药物对是MICU的阿曲库铵+氢化可的松,MICU和EICU的美罗培南+丙戊酸,SICU的阿司匹林+华法林。结论:目前的研究显示三种icu患者的pddi发生频率和性质不同。我们建议在其他环境中开展类似的研究,为不同类型icu的临床相关pddi制定循证指导。本文引自:Hosseinpoor Z, Farzanegan B, Baniasadi S.比较呼吸转诊中心急诊科、内科和外科icu中重要和充分记录的潜在药物相互作用。中华检验医学杂志;2009;26(5):574-578。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信