Lack of Evidence for Crossover Fatigue with Plantar Flexor Muscles.

IF 2.4
Saman Hadjizadeh Anvar, Mohammad Reza Kordi, Shahab Alizadeh, Emma Ramsay, Fatemeh Shabkhiz, David G Behm
{"title":"Lack of Evidence for Crossover Fatigue with Plantar Flexor Muscles.","authors":"Saman Hadjizadeh Anvar,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Kordi,&nbsp;Shahab Alizadeh,&nbsp;Emma Ramsay,&nbsp;Fatemeh Shabkhiz,&nbsp;David G Behm","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2022.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The occurrence and mechanisms underlying non-local or crossover muscle fatigue is an ongoing issue. This study aimed to investigate crossover fatigue of the plantar flexor muscles. Sixteen recreationally active males (n = 6) and females (n = 10) visited the laboratory for four sessions and performed a single 5-s pre-test maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with each plantar flexors muscle. Thereafter, the fatigue intervention involved two 100-s MVICs (60-s recovery) with their dominant plantar flexors or rested for 260-s (control). Subsequently, in two separate sessions, Hoffman reflexes (H-reflex) were evoked in the non-dominant, non-exercised, leg before and following the dominant leg fatigue or control intervention (Fatigue-Reflex and Control-Reflex conditions). MVIC forces and volitional (V)-waves were monitored in the non-dominant leg in the other two sessions (Fatigue-MVIC and Control-MVIC) before and after the intervention (fatigue or control) as well as during 12 repeated MVICs and immediately thereafter. Despite the force reduction in the dominant leg (42.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), no crossover force deficit with single (F<sub>(1,9)</sub> = 0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.88, <i>pƞ<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.003) or repeated (F<sub>(1,9)</sub> = 0.006, <i>p = 0.93, pƞ<sup>2</sup> = 0.001</i>) MVIC testing were observed. The H-reflex did not change after the fatigue (F<sub>(1,7)</sub> = 0.51; <i>p</i> = 0.49; <i>pƞ<sup>2</sup> =</i> 0.06) or repeated MVICs (F<sub>(1,8)</sub> = 0.27; <i>p</i> = 0.61; <i>pƞ<sup>2</sup> =</i> 0.03). There were also no crossover effects of fatigue on the V-wave with single (F<sub>(1,8)</sub> = 3.71, <i>p = 0.09, pƞ<sup>2</sup> = 0.31</i>) or repeated MVICs (F<sub>(1,6)</sub> = 1.45, <i>p = 0.27, pƞ<sup>2</sup> = 0.19</i>). Crossover fatigue was not evident with the plantar flexors nor any significant changes in H-reflex and V-waves in the soleus muscle. This finding suggests that crossover fatigue may not necessarily occur in slow-twitch predominant muscle groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":520691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science & medicine","volume":" ","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157513/pdf/jssm-21-214.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The occurrence and mechanisms underlying non-local or crossover muscle fatigue is an ongoing issue. This study aimed to investigate crossover fatigue of the plantar flexor muscles. Sixteen recreationally active males (n = 6) and females (n = 10) visited the laboratory for four sessions and performed a single 5-s pre-test maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with each plantar flexors muscle. Thereafter, the fatigue intervention involved two 100-s MVICs (60-s recovery) with their dominant plantar flexors or rested for 260-s (control). Subsequently, in two separate sessions, Hoffman reflexes (H-reflex) were evoked in the non-dominant, non-exercised, leg before and following the dominant leg fatigue or control intervention (Fatigue-Reflex and Control-Reflex conditions). MVIC forces and volitional (V)-waves were monitored in the non-dominant leg in the other two sessions (Fatigue-MVIC and Control-MVIC) before and after the intervention (fatigue or control) as well as during 12 repeated MVICs and immediately thereafter. Despite the force reduction in the dominant leg (42.4%, p = 0.002), no crossover force deficit with single (F(1,9) = 0.02, p = 0.88, pƞ2 = 0.003) or repeated (F(1,9) = 0.006, p = 0.93, pƞ2 = 0.001) MVIC testing were observed. The H-reflex did not change after the fatigue (F(1,7) = 0.51; p = 0.49; pƞ2 = 0.06) or repeated MVICs (F(1,8) = 0.27; p = 0.61; pƞ2 = 0.03). There were also no crossover effects of fatigue on the V-wave with single (F(1,8) = 3.71, p = 0.09, pƞ2 = 0.31) or repeated MVICs (F(1,6) = 1.45, p = 0.27, pƞ2 = 0.19). Crossover fatigue was not evident with the plantar flexors nor any significant changes in H-reflex and V-waves in the soleus muscle. This finding suggests that crossover fatigue may not necessarily occur in slow-twitch predominant muscle groups.

Abstract Image

缺乏足底屈肌交叉疲劳的证据。
非局部或交叉肌疲劳的发生和机制是一个持续的问题。本研究旨在探讨足底屈肌的交叉疲劳。16名娱乐活动的男性(n = 6)和女性(n = 10)在实验室进行了4次测试,并对每个足底屈肌进行了一次5秒的最大自主等距收缩(MVIC)测试。此后,疲劳干预涉及两个100秒的mvic(60秒恢复),其主要的足底屈肌或休息260秒(对照组)。随后,在两个单独的实验中,在主导性腿疲劳或控制性干预(疲劳-反射和控制-反射条件)之前和之后,在非支配性、未运动的腿上诱发霍夫曼反射(h反射)。在干预(疲劳或控制)前后以及12次重复MVIC期间和之后,在其他两个阶段(疲劳-MVIC和控制-MVIC)中,监测非优势腿的MVIC力量和意志(V)波。尽管主腿的力减少(42.4%,p = 0.002),但单次(F(1,9) = 0.02, p = 0.88, pƞ2 = 0.003)或重复(F(1,9) = 0.006, p = 0.93, pƞ2 = 0.001) MVIC检测未观察到交叉力不足。疲劳后h反射无明显变化(F(1,7) = 0.51;P = 0.49;pƞ2 = 0.06)或重复mvic (F(1,8) = 0.27;P = 0.61;Pƞ2 = 0.03)。疲劳对单次(F(1,8) = 3.71, p = 0.09, pƞ2 = 0.31)和重复mvic (F(1,6) = 1.45, p = 0.27, pƞ2 = 0.19)的v波也没有交叉影响。足底屈肌的交叉疲劳不明显,比目鱼肌的h反射和v波也没有明显变化。这一发现表明交叉疲劳不一定发生在慢抽搐的主要肌肉群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书