What are the odds? Identifying factors related to competitive success in powerlifting.

IF 2.8
Daniel J van den Hoek, Patrick J Owen, Joel M Garrett, Robert J Howells, Joshua Pearson, Jemima G Spathis, Christopher Latella
{"title":"What are the odds? Identifying factors related to competitive success in powerlifting.","authors":"Daniel J van den Hoek,&nbsp;Patrick J Owen,&nbsp;Joel M Garrett,&nbsp;Robert J Howells,&nbsp;Joshua Pearson,&nbsp;Jemima G Spathis,&nbsp;Christopher Latella","doi":"10.1186/s13102-022-00505-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability for athletes to gain a competitive advantage over their opponents is well recognised. At times, this advantage may be considered a marginal gain. However, in the context of competition, marginal advantages may be the difference between winning and losing. This investigation explores how competition factors influence the odds of competitive success (i.e. winning) in powerlifting (PL) to assist athletes and coaches in achieving a competitive advantage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of competition data from raw/classic, Australian powerlifting competitions 2010-2019 was conducted. Data included 10,599 competition entries (males: n = 6567 [62%], females: n = 4032 [38%]). Independent t-tests were used to compare continuous data between sexes or winners and non-winners at an event. Cohen's d and the 95% confidence interval (d [95% CI]) were calculated. Univariate odds of winning an event based on independent variables (age [irrespective of category], sex, body weight and weight of first lift attempt [regardless of success]), were assessed by separate simple logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared to males, the odds of winning for females were 50% greater (OR [95% CI] 1.500 [1.384, 1.625]; P < 0.001). Athletes who had larger first lift attempts (Squat: + 7.0 kg P < 0.001, Bench Press: + 3.2 kg P < 0.001, and Deadlift: + 6.1 kg P < 0.001and competed for a longer period (winners: 401 vs non-winners: 304 days, P < 0.001) had an increased likelihood winning. Age was associated with increased odds of success for males (OR [95% CI] 1.014 [1.009, 1.019], P < 0.001) per additional year of age for males, but not females (P = 0.509).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple factors appear to contribute to the likelihood of winning a PL competition. These results may help coaches to develop competition and training strategies that optimise athletes' likelihood of competitive success in PL.</p>","PeriodicalId":520573,"journal":{"name":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206735/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00505-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The ability for athletes to gain a competitive advantage over their opponents is well recognised. At times, this advantage may be considered a marginal gain. However, in the context of competition, marginal advantages may be the difference between winning and losing. This investigation explores how competition factors influence the odds of competitive success (i.e. winning) in powerlifting (PL) to assist athletes and coaches in achieving a competitive advantage.

Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of competition data from raw/classic, Australian powerlifting competitions 2010-2019 was conducted. Data included 10,599 competition entries (males: n = 6567 [62%], females: n = 4032 [38%]). Independent t-tests were used to compare continuous data between sexes or winners and non-winners at an event. Cohen's d and the 95% confidence interval (d [95% CI]) were calculated. Univariate odds of winning an event based on independent variables (age [irrespective of category], sex, body weight and weight of first lift attempt [regardless of success]), were assessed by separate simple logistic regression.

Results: When compared to males, the odds of winning for females were 50% greater (OR [95% CI] 1.500 [1.384, 1.625]; P < 0.001). Athletes who had larger first lift attempts (Squat: + 7.0 kg P < 0.001, Bench Press: + 3.2 kg P < 0.001, and Deadlift: + 6.1 kg P < 0.001and competed for a longer period (winners: 401 vs non-winners: 304 days, P < 0.001) had an increased likelihood winning. Age was associated with increased odds of success for males (OR [95% CI] 1.014 [1.009, 1.019], P < 0.001) per additional year of age for males, but not females (P = 0.509).

Conclusions: Multiple factors appear to contribute to the likelihood of winning a PL competition. These results may help coaches to develop competition and training strategies that optimise athletes' likelihood of competitive success in PL.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

几率有多大?确定与举重比赛成功相关的因素。
背景:运动员获得竞争优势的能力是公认的。有时,这种优势可能被认为是边际收益。然而,在竞争的背景下,边际优势可能是输赢的区别。本调查探讨了竞争因素如何影响在举重(PL)的竞争成功(即获胜)的几率,以帮助运动员和教练实现竞争优势。方法:对2010-2019年澳大利亚举重比赛的原始/经典比赛数据进行横断面回顾性分析。数据包括10,599个参赛作品(男性:n = 6567[62%],女性:n = 4032[38%])。独立t检验用于比较性别之间的连续数据,或在一项赛事中获胜者和非获胜者。计算Cohen’s d和95%置信区间(d [95% CI])。基于自变量(年龄[与类别无关]、性别、体重和第一次举重尝试的体重[与成功与否无关])的单变量获胜几率通过单独的简单逻辑回归进行评估。结果:与男性相比,女性的获胜几率高出50% (OR [95% CI] 1.500 [1.384, 1.625];结论:多种因素似乎有助于赢得联赛的可能性。这些结果可以帮助教练制定比赛和训练策略,以优化运动员在PL中竞争成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书