Predicaments during a period of health emergency: Waiving patent protections or innovative public procurement? The example of advance purchase agreements (APA) for COVID-19 vaccines.

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-227008
Nuria Garrido Cuenca
{"title":"Predicaments during a period of health emergency: Waiving patent protections or innovative public procurement? The example of advance purchase agreements (APA) for COVID-19 vaccines.","authors":"Nuria Garrido Cuenca","doi":"10.3233/JRS-227008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The health emergency provoked by the worldwide pandemic requires immediate action to achieve the immunization of the population and to stop further contagion. The systems of public procurement needed to adapt in a very short time to reach agreements with the pharmaceutical industry.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Proposing options between the waiving of patent protections and innovative public procurement, principally the European Advance Purchase Agreements (APA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A description of the actual situation and the necessary regulatory reforms. The sources are scientific articles, legislative compendiums and opinion pieces and the current press.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The debate over the waiving of patent protections at this time is both misleading and ineffective due to the economic and legal problems involved. The path of the APA has proven to be very effective, although some deficits should be corrected, principally regarding questions of transparency and confidentiality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the possible options for the acquisition of the COVID-19 vaccine and its universal access, agreements and cooperation between States and innovative industry are desirable. One successful path is that of the advance purchase agreements utilized by the European Union, another could be that of voluntary licensing. We propose following these routes as opposed to the waiving of patent protections.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-227008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The health emergency provoked by the worldwide pandemic requires immediate action to achieve the immunization of the population and to stop further contagion. The systems of public procurement needed to adapt in a very short time to reach agreements with the pharmaceutical industry.

Objective: Proposing options between the waiving of patent protections and innovative public procurement, principally the European Advance Purchase Agreements (APA).

Methods: A description of the actual situation and the necessary regulatory reforms. The sources are scientific articles, legislative compendiums and opinion pieces and the current press.

Results: The debate over the waiving of patent protections at this time is both misleading and ineffective due to the economic and legal problems involved. The path of the APA has proven to be very effective, although some deficits should be corrected, principally regarding questions of transparency and confidentiality.

Conclusions: Among the possible options for the acquisition of the COVID-19 vaccine and its universal access, agreements and cooperation between States and innovative industry are desirable. One successful path is that of the advance purchase agreements utilized by the European Union, another could be that of voluntary licensing. We propose following these routes as opposed to the waiving of patent protections.

分享
查看原文
卫生紧急时期的困境:放弃专利保护还是创新的公共采购?COVID-19疫苗预购协议(APA)的例子。
背景:全球大流行引发的卫生紧急情况要求立即采取行动,实现人口免疫并阻止进一步传染。公共采购制度需要在很短的时间内进行调整,以便与制药业达成协议。目的:在放弃专利保护和创新公共采购之间提出选择,主要是欧洲提前采购协议(APA)。方法:对实际情况进行描述并进行必要的监管改革。其来源是科学文章、立法摘要、评论文章和当前的新闻界。结果:由于涉及经济和法律问题,此时关于放弃专利保护的争论既具有误导性又无效。APA的道路已被证明是非常有效的,尽管一些缺陷应该得到纠正,主要是关于透明度和保密性的问题。结论:在获取COVID-19疫苗及其普遍可及的可能选择中,国家与创新产业之间的协议和合作是可取的。一个成功的途径是欧洲联盟采用的预先购买协议,另一个可能是自愿许可。我们建议遵循这些路线,而不是放弃专利保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信