{"title":"'Walking in the shoes of our patients': a scoping review of healthcare professionals learning from the simulation of patient illness experiences.","authors":"Milda Karvelytė, Janet Rogers, Gerard J Gormley","doi":"10.1186/s41077-021-00194-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health professionals who have experienced ill-health appear to demonstrate greater empathy towards their patients. Simulation can afford learners opportunities to experience aspects of illness, but to date, there has been no overarching review of the extent of this practice or the impact on empathic skills.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine from the evidence-what is known about simulation-based learning methods of creating illness experiences for health professions and the impact on their empathic skills.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework informed our scoping review of articles relevant to our research question. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) were searched, and a sample of 516 citations was screened. Following review and application of our exclusion criteria, 77 articles were selected to be included in this review.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 77 articles, 52 (68%) originated from the USA, 37 (48%) of studies were qualitative based and 17 (22%) used a mixed-methods model. Of all the articles in our scope, the majority (87%) reported a positive impact and range of emotions evoked on learners. However, some studies observed more negative effects and additional debriefing was required post-simulation. Learners were noted to internalise perceived experiences of illness and to critically reflect on their empathic role as healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A diverse range of simulation methods and techniques, evoking an emotional and embodied experience, appear to have a positive impact on empathy and could be argued as offering a complementary approach in healthcare education; however, the long-term impact remains largely unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"6 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645154/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00194-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Background: Health professionals who have experienced ill-health appear to demonstrate greater empathy towards their patients. Simulation can afford learners opportunities to experience aspects of illness, but to date, there has been no overarching review of the extent of this practice or the impact on empathic skills.
Objective: To determine from the evidence-what is known about simulation-based learning methods of creating illness experiences for health professions and the impact on their empathic skills.
Study selection: Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework informed our scoping review of articles relevant to our research question. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) were searched, and a sample of 516 citations was screened. Following review and application of our exclusion criteria, 77 articles were selected to be included in this review.
Findings: Of the 77 articles, 52 (68%) originated from the USA, 37 (48%) of studies were qualitative based and 17 (22%) used a mixed-methods model. Of all the articles in our scope, the majority (87%) reported a positive impact and range of emotions evoked on learners. However, some studies observed more negative effects and additional debriefing was required post-simulation. Learners were noted to internalise perceived experiences of illness and to critically reflect on their empathic role as healthcare providers.
Conclusions: A diverse range of simulation methods and techniques, evoking an emotional and embodied experience, appear to have a positive impact on empathy and could be argued as offering a complementary approach in healthcare education; however, the long-term impact remains largely unknown.
背景:经历过健康问题的卫生专业人员似乎对患者表现出更大的同理心。模拟可以为学习者提供体验疾病各个方面的机会,但到目前为止,还没有对这种做法的程度或对移情技能的影响进行全面的审查。目的:从证据中确定为卫生专业人员创造疾病体验的基于模拟的学习方法的已知情况,以及对其移情技能的影响。研究选择:Arksey和O'Malley的方法论框架为我们对与我们的研究问题相关的文章的范围审查提供了依据。检索了三个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science),筛选了516篇引文样本。在审查和应用我们的排除标准后,选择了77篇文章纳入本次审查。研究结果:在77篇文章中,52篇(68%)来自美国,37篇(48%)研究基于定性,17篇(22%)使用混合方法模型。在我们范围内的所有文章中,大多数(87%)报道了对学习者的积极影响和引发的情绪范围。然而,一些研究观察到了更多的负面影响,模拟后需要额外的汇报。研究发现,学习者会内化感知到的疾病经历,并批判性地反思他们作为医疗保健提供者的移情作用。结论:各种各样的模拟方法和技术,唤起情感和具体体验,似乎对同理心有积极影响,可以说是在医疗保健教育中提供了一种互补的方法;然而,其长期影响在很大程度上仍是未知的。