Evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: Meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Yin Yin, Wei Zeng, Wei Jing, Wei Tang, Wei Hua Guo
{"title":"Evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yin Yin,&nbsp;Wei Zeng,&nbsp;Wei Jing,&nbsp;Wei Tang,&nbsp;Wei Hua Guo","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was performed to investigate the effects of hyperbaric oxygen and other approaches for treating the osteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) systematically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of ORNJ were screened, and foreign language databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched via a computer; Chinese databases such as CNKI, VIP, Wanfang data, and CBM were searched from the established database to September 2020. Relevant books were searched manually to collect all literatures on the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen and its related therapies in ORNJ treatment. Two researchers were independent and mutually blind, the papers were selected, data were collected, and the bias risk was evaluated. If any difference was detected, it would be decided by discussion or arbitrated by a third party. The data related to the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen and its related therapy in the treatment of the ORNJ were extracted, and the Revman5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis. In case of large heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed. A funnel chart was used to evaluate possible publication bias qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials and seven cohort studies were included in Meta-analyses. In ORNJ treatment, no significant differences between the group subjected to hyperbaric oxygen and both surgery and antibiotics and the group that underwent both surgery and antibiotics (RR=1.16, 95%CI: 0.86~1.58, <i>P</i>>0.05); between the group with hyperbaric oxygen and the group with antibiotics (RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.63~1.09, <i>P</i>>0.05); between the group with hyperbaric oxygen and the group with antifibrotic drugs (RR=0.07, 95%CI: 0.00~155.86, <i>P</i>>0.05); between the group with single or combined use of HBO and the group with other intervention methods (RR=0.89, 95%CI: 0.67~1.19, <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy cannot replace surgery and antibiotic therapy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is not superior to antibiotics and antifibrotic drugs, but the benefits of antifibrotic drugs should be further explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":35800,"journal":{"name":"华西口腔医学杂志","volume":"39 6","pages":"690-697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703098/pdf/wcjs-39-06-690.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"华西口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study was performed to investigate the effects of hyperbaric oxygen and other approaches for treating the osteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) systematically.

Methods: According to the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of ORNJ were screened, and foreign language databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched via a computer; Chinese databases such as CNKI, VIP, Wanfang data, and CBM were searched from the established database to September 2020. Relevant books were searched manually to collect all literatures on the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen and its related therapies in ORNJ treatment. Two researchers were independent and mutually blind, the papers were selected, data were collected, and the bias risk was evaluated. If any difference was detected, it would be decided by discussion or arbitrated by a third party. The data related to the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen and its related therapy in the treatment of the ORNJ were extracted, and the Revman5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis. In case of large heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed. A funnel chart was used to evaluate possible publication bias qualitatively.

Results: Four randomized controlled trials and seven cohort studies were included in Meta-analyses. In ORNJ treatment, no significant differences between the group subjected to hyperbaric oxygen and both surgery and antibiotics and the group that underwent both surgery and antibiotics (RR=1.16, 95%CI: 0.86~1.58, P>0.05); between the group with hyperbaric oxygen and the group with antibiotics (RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.63~1.09, P>0.05); between the group with hyperbaric oxygen and the group with antifibrotic drugs (RR=0.07, 95%CI: 0.00~155.86, P>0.05); between the group with single or combined use of HBO and the group with other intervention methods (RR=0.89, 95%CI: 0.67~1.19, P>0.05).

Conclusions: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy cannot replace surgery and antibiotic therapy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is not superior to antibiotics and antifibrotic drugs, but the benefits of antifibrotic drugs should be further explored.

Abstract Image

高压氧治疗颌骨放射性骨坏死的评价:荟萃分析。
目的:系统探讨高压氧和其他方法治疗颌骨放射性骨坏死(ORNJ)的效果。方法:根据预设的纳入和排除标准,筛选高压氧治疗ORNJ的随机对照试验和队列研究,并通过计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆等外文数据库;从已建立的数据库中检索至2020年9月,检索到CNKI、VIP、万方数据、CBM等中文数据库。人工检索相关书籍,收集所有关于高压氧及其相关疗法治疗ORNJ疗效的文献。两名独立、相互盲的研究者,选择论文,收集资料,评估偏倚风险。如果发现任何差异,将通过讨论决定或由第三方仲裁。提取高压氧及其相关疗法治疗ORNJ疗效相关数据,采用Revman5.4软件进行meta分析。在异质性较大的情况下,进行敏感性分析。采用漏斗图对可能的发表偏倚进行定性评价。结果:meta分析纳入4项随机对照试验和7项队列研究。在ORNJ治疗中,高压氧联合手术加抗生素组与手术加抗生素组比较,差异无统计学意义(RR=1.16, 95%CI: 0.86~1.58, P>0.05);高压氧组与抗生素组比较(RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.63~1.09, P>0.05);高压氧组与抗纤维化药物组比较(RR=0.07, 95%CI: 0.00~155.86, P>0.05);单独或联合使用高压氧组与其他干预方式组间的差异(RR=0.89, 95%CI: 0.67~1.19, P>0.05)。结论:高压氧治疗不能替代手术和抗生素治疗。高压氧治疗并不优于抗生素和抗纤维化药物,但抗纤维化药物的益处有待进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
华西口腔医学杂志
华西口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6397
期刊介绍: West China Journal of Stomatology (WCJS, pISSN 1000-1182, eISSN 2618-0456, CN 51-1169/R), published bimonthly, is a peer-reviewed Open Access journal, hosted by Sichuan university and Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. WCJS was established in 1983 and indexed in Medline/Pubmed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract(CA), CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信