Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Myocardial Strain Before and After Aortic Valve Replacement.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2022-01-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1288
Gajinder Pal Singh Kaler, Rakesh Mahla, Himanshu Mahla, Sarita Choudhary, Gurdarshan Singh, Raghuveer Prasad Patel, Navjot Kaur Kaler
{"title":"Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Myocardial Strain Before and After Aortic Valve Replacement.","authors":"Gajinder Pal Singh Kaler,&nbsp;Rakesh Mahla,&nbsp;Himanshu Mahla,&nbsp;Sarita Choudhary,&nbsp;Gurdarshan Singh,&nbsp;Raghuveer Prasad Patel,&nbsp;Navjot Kaur Kaler","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>In patients of aortic stenosis and regurgitation, pressure and volume effects on left ventricular function are occult and missed by routine echocardiography markers like ejection fraction (EF). Speckle tracking analysis by measuring global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain seems to ascertain this occult LV function parameters at an early phase in a more comprehensive manner. Limited studies have examined these parameters pre/post aortic valve replacement (AVR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>94 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation (AR), planned for AVR were included (as per set inclusion criteria) along with 15 normal controls-15 months prospective study. Routine echocardiography and speckle tracking imaging was done at baseline (pre AVR) and post AVR at 1st week, 1st month and 3rd month of follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients completed study (70 in AS and 20 in AR group). In AS group mean values (± 2 standard deviations) of global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved from a baseline -10.9% (± 3.9) to -19.4% (±3.8) at 3rd month (p value < 0.0001). Mean values of global circumferential strain (GCS) too improved from -17.3% (±4.5) to -21.4% (±3.6) respectively (p value < 0.0001). In AR group too mean values of global longitudinal strain progressed from a baseline -12.6% (±3.9) to -19.4% (±3.4) at three months of follow (p value < 0.0001) and mean values of global circumferential strain also progressed from -15.3% (±3.4) at baseline to -21.7% (±3.1) respectively (p value < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Magnitude of recovery of GLS and GCS after AVR was more as compared to recovery in EF. Poor GLS/GCS values at baseline were associated with lesser recovery pressing need for an earlier intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"33 4","pages":"353-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/7d/sha-353-363.PMC8765039.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: In patients of aortic stenosis and regurgitation, pressure and volume effects on left ventricular function are occult and missed by routine echocardiography markers like ejection fraction (EF). Speckle tracking analysis by measuring global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain seems to ascertain this occult LV function parameters at an early phase in a more comprehensive manner. Limited studies have examined these parameters pre/post aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods: 94 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation (AR), planned for AVR were included (as per set inclusion criteria) along with 15 normal controls-15 months prospective study. Routine echocardiography and speckle tracking imaging was done at baseline (pre AVR) and post AVR at 1st week, 1st month and 3rd month of follow up.

Results: 90 patients completed study (70 in AS and 20 in AR group). In AS group mean values (± 2 standard deviations) of global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved from a baseline -10.9% (± 3.9) to -19.4% (±3.8) at 3rd month (p value < 0.0001). Mean values of global circumferential strain (GCS) too improved from -17.3% (±4.5) to -21.4% (±3.6) respectively (p value < 0.0001). In AR group too mean values of global longitudinal strain progressed from a baseline -12.6% (±3.9) to -19.4% (±3.4) at three months of follow (p value < 0.0001) and mean values of global circumferential strain also progressed from -15.3% (±3.4) at baseline to -21.7% (±3.1) respectively (p value < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Magnitude of recovery of GLS and GCS after AVR was more as compared to recovery in EF. Poor GLS/GCS values at baseline were associated with lesser recovery pressing need for an earlier intervention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

斑点跟踪超声心动图评价主动脉瓣置换术前后心肌应变的左心室功能。
背景与目的:在主动脉瓣狭窄和反流患者中,常规超声心动图指标如射血分数(EF)无法发现压力和容积对左心室功能的影响。通过测量整体纵向应变和整体周向应变进行散斑跟踪分析,似乎可以更全面地在早期确定这种隐蔽的LV函数参数。有限的研究检查了主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)前后的这些参数。方法:连续纳入94例有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)或主动脉瓣反流(AR)患者,计划进行AVR(按照设定的纳入标准),同时纳入15例正常对照,为期15个月的前瞻性研究。在基线(AVR前)和AVR后随访第1周、第1个月和第3个月进行常规超声心动图和斑点跟踪成像。结果:90例患者完成研究(AS组70例,AR组20例)。AS组整体纵向应变(GLS)的平均值(±2个标准差)从基线的-10.9%(±3.9)改善到第3个月的-19.4%(±3.8)(p值< 0.0001)。GCS均值也由-17.3%(±4.5)提高到-21.4%(±3.6)(p值< 0.0001)。AR组整体纵向应变平均值从基线时的-12.6%(±3.9)上升到随访3个月时的-19.4%(±3.4)(p值< 0.0001),整体周向应变平均值也从基线时的-15.3%(±3.4)上升到-21.7%(±3.1)(p值< 0.0001)。结论:AVR术后GLS和GCS的恢复幅度大于EF。基线时较差的GLS/GCS值与较低的恢复有关,迫切需要早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信