Proton Beam Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Tumors: An Analysis of Dosimetric and Clinical Outcomes.

Saad Sheikh, Michael Z Kharouta, Rajesh Pidikiti, Nicholas J Damico, Serah Choi, Jennifer A Dorth, David B Mansur, Mitchell X Machtay, Min Yao, Aashish D Bhatt
{"title":"Proton Beam Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Tumors: An Analysis of Dosimetric and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Saad Sheikh,&nbsp;Michael Z Kharouta,&nbsp;Rajesh Pidikiti,&nbsp;Nicholas J Damico,&nbsp;Serah Choi,&nbsp;Jennifer A Dorth,&nbsp;David B Mansur,&nbsp;Mitchell X Machtay,&nbsp;Min Yao,&nbsp;Aashish D Bhatt","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Locally advanced tumors of the head and neck region often lie in close proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs). Providing effective treatment coverage to these malignancies while minimizing radiation dose to surrounding OARs is advantageous. Our aim is to compare dosimetric data of OARs from proton beam therapy (PBT) plans to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans, and to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with PBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with locally advanced head and neck tumors treated with PBT at our institution from 2016 to 2019. Study endpoints included mean and maximum doses for the OAR structures for each treatment plan, overall survival, time to local-regional or distant progression, and presence of acute and late toxicities. Mean and maximum doses to OAR structures were compared between treatment modalities using a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients were identified. Clinical target volume coverage was >95% for both PBT and VMAT plans. PBT plans showed a significant reduction to the mean doses to all OARs, and max doses to most OARs (P<0.05). The largest reduction mean dose was seen in the contralateral cochlea and parotid glands at 71% and 75%, respectively. Median follow-up was 27 months. Overall survival at 4 years was 44.75%. Freedom from local-regional progression was 73.28% at 2 years. The majority of patients developed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade I dermatitis, mucositis, or both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBT resulted in meaningful dose reductions to OARs while maintaining comparable target coverage when compared with VMAT plans. Further refinements to proton therapy may have the potential to further minimize dose to critical structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Locally advanced tumors of the head and neck region often lie in close proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs). Providing effective treatment coverage to these malignancies while minimizing radiation dose to surrounding OARs is advantageous. Our aim is to compare dosimetric data of OARs from proton beam therapy (PBT) plans to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans, and to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with PBT.

Methods: We identified patients with locally advanced head and neck tumors treated with PBT at our institution from 2016 to 2019. Study endpoints included mean and maximum doses for the OAR structures for each treatment plan, overall survival, time to local-regional or distant progression, and presence of acute and late toxicities. Mean and maximum doses to OAR structures were compared between treatment modalities using a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results: A total of 42 patients were identified. Clinical target volume coverage was >95% for both PBT and VMAT plans. PBT plans showed a significant reduction to the mean doses to all OARs, and max doses to most OARs (P<0.05). The largest reduction mean dose was seen in the contralateral cochlea and parotid glands at 71% and 75%, respectively. Median follow-up was 27 months. Overall survival at 4 years was 44.75%. Freedom from local-regional progression was 73.28% at 2 years. The majority of patients developed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade I dermatitis, mucositis, or both.

Conclusions: PBT resulted in meaningful dose reductions to OARs while maintaining comparable target coverage when compared with VMAT plans. Further refinements to proton therapy may have the potential to further minimize dose to critical structures.

质子束治疗局部晚期头颈部肿瘤:剂量学和临床结果分析。
目的:局部进展期头颈部肿瘤常靠近危险器官(OARs)。为这些恶性肿瘤提供有效的治疗覆盖,同时尽量减少对周围桨叶的辐射剂量是有利的。我们的目的是比较质子束治疗(PBT)计划和体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)治疗计划的剂量学数据,并评估PBT治疗患者的临床结果。方法:选取2016年至2019年在我院接受PBT治疗的局部晚期头颈部肿瘤患者。研究终点包括每种治疗方案的OAR结构的平均和最大剂量、总生存期、局部或远处进展的时间以及急性和晚期毒性的存在。使用配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较不同治疗方式对桨叶结构的平均和最大剂量。p值结果:共鉴定出42例患者。PBT和VMAT计划的临床靶体积覆盖率均>95%。PBT计划显示所有桨的平均剂量和大多数桨的最大剂量显著减少(p结论:与VMAT计划相比,PBT导致桨的剂量显著减少,同时保持相当的目标覆盖率。质子治疗的进一步改进可能有潜力进一步减少对关键结构的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信