Through a glass, darkly? HepaRG and HepG2 cells as models of human phase I drug metabolism.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Metabolism Reviews Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-23 DOI:10.1080/03602532.2022.2039688
Lesley A Stanley, C Roland Wolf
{"title":"Through a glass, darkly? HepaRG and HepG2 cells as models of human phase I drug metabolism.","authors":"Lesley A Stanley,&nbsp;C Roland Wolf","doi":"10.1080/03602532.2022.2039688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pharmacokinetic and safety assessment of drug candidates is becoming increasingly dependent upon <i>in vitro</i> models of hepatic metabolism and toxicity. Predominant among these is the HepG2 cell line, although HepaRG is becoming increasingly popular because of its perceived closer resemblance to human hepatocytes. We review the functionality of these cell lines in terms of Phase I protein expression, basal cytochrome P450-dependent activity, and utility in P450 induction studies. Our analysis indicates that HepG2 cells are severely compromised: proteomic studies show that they express few key proteins in common with hepatocytes and they lack drug-metabolizing capacity. Differentiated HepaRGs are more hepatocyte-like than HepG2s, but they also have limitations, and it is difficult to assess their utility because of the enormous variability in data reported, possibly arising from the complex differentiation protocols required to obtain hepatocyte-like cells. This is exacerbated by the use of DMSO in the induction protocol, together with proprietary supplements whose composition is a commercial secret. We conclude that, while currently available data on the utility of HepaRG generates a confusing picture, this line does have potential utility in drug metabolism studies. However, to allow studies to be compared directly a standardized, reproducible differentiation protocol is essential and the cell line's functionality in terms of known mechanisms of P450 regulation must be demonstrated. We, therefore, support the development of regulatory guidelines for the use of HepaRGs in induction studies as a first step in generating a database of consistent, reliable data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11307,"journal":{"name":"Drug Metabolism Reviews","volume":"54 1","pages":"46-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Metabolism Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2022.2039688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic and safety assessment of drug candidates is becoming increasingly dependent upon in vitro models of hepatic metabolism and toxicity. Predominant among these is the HepG2 cell line, although HepaRG is becoming increasingly popular because of its perceived closer resemblance to human hepatocytes. We review the functionality of these cell lines in terms of Phase I protein expression, basal cytochrome P450-dependent activity, and utility in P450 induction studies. Our analysis indicates that HepG2 cells are severely compromised: proteomic studies show that they express few key proteins in common with hepatocytes and they lack drug-metabolizing capacity. Differentiated HepaRGs are more hepatocyte-like than HepG2s, but they also have limitations, and it is difficult to assess their utility because of the enormous variability in data reported, possibly arising from the complex differentiation protocols required to obtain hepatocyte-like cells. This is exacerbated by the use of DMSO in the induction protocol, together with proprietary supplements whose composition is a commercial secret. We conclude that, while currently available data on the utility of HepaRG generates a confusing picture, this line does have potential utility in drug metabolism studies. However, to allow studies to be compared directly a standardized, reproducible differentiation protocol is essential and the cell line's functionality in terms of known mechanisms of P450 regulation must be demonstrated. We, therefore, support the development of regulatory guidelines for the use of HepaRGs in induction studies as a first step in generating a database of consistent, reliable data.

透过玻璃,黑暗地?HepaRG和HepG2细胞作为人类I期药物代谢模型。
候选药物的药代动力学和安全性评估越来越依赖于肝代谢和毒性的体外模型。其中主要的是HepG2细胞系,尽管HepaRG因其被认为与人类肝细胞更相似而越来越受欢迎。我们回顾了这些细胞系在I期蛋白表达、基础细胞色素P450依赖活性和P450诱导研究中的效用方面的功能。我们的分析表明,HepG2细胞受到严重损害:蛋白质组学研究表明,它们表达与肝细胞相同的几种关键蛋白,并且缺乏药物代谢能力。分化的HepaRGs比HepG2s更像肝细胞,但它们也有局限性,而且很难评估它们的效用,因为所报道的数据存在巨大的可变性,这可能是由于获得肝细胞样细胞所需的复杂分化方案所致。在诱导方案中使用DMSO以及其成分属于商业秘密的专有补充剂加剧了这种情况。我们的结论是,虽然目前关于HepaRG效用的可用数据产生了令人困惑的画面,但这条线在药物代谢研究中确实具有潜在的效用。然而,为了使研究能够直接进行比较,一个标准化的、可重复的分化方案是必不可少的,并且必须证明细胞系在P450调节的已知机制方面的功能。因此,我们支持制定在诱导研究中使用HepaRGs的监管指南,作为建立一致、可靠数据数据库的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Metabolism Reviews
Drug Metabolism Reviews 医学-药学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Drug Metabolism Reviews consistently provides critically needed reviews of an impressive array of drug metabolism research-covering established, new, and potential drugs; environmentally toxic chemicals; absorption; metabolism and excretion; and enzymology of all living species. Additionally, the journal offers new hypotheses of interest to diverse groups of medical professionals including pharmacologists, toxicologists, chemists, microbiologists, pharmacokineticists, immunologists, mass spectroscopists, as well as enzymologists working in xenobiotic biotransformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信