The impact of surge adaptations on hospitalist care teams during the COVID-19 pandemic utilizing a rapid qualitative analysis approach.

Angela Keniston, Vishruti Patel, Lauren McBeth, Kasey Bowden, Alexandra Gallant, Marisha Burden
{"title":"The impact of surge adaptations on hospitalist care teams during the COVID-19 pandemic utilizing a rapid qualitative analysis approach.","authors":"Angela Keniston,&nbsp;Vishruti Patel,&nbsp;Lauren McBeth,&nbsp;Kasey Bowden,&nbsp;Alexandra Gallant,&nbsp;Marisha Burden","doi":"10.1186/s13690-022-00804-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital systems have rapidly adapted to manage the influx of patients with COVID-19 and hospitalists, specialists in inpatient care, have been at the forefront of this response, rapidly adapting to serve the ever-changing needs of the community and hospital system. Institutional leaders, including clinical care team members and administrators, deployed many different strategies (i.e. adaptations) to manage the influx of patients. While many different strategies were utilized in hospitals across the United States, it is unclear how frontline care teams experienced these strategies and multifaceted changes. As these surge adaptations likely directly impact clinical care teams, we aimed to understand the perceptions and impact of these clinical care and staffing adaptations on hospitalists and care team members in order to optimize future surge plans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with hospitalist physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and hospital nursing and care management staff at a quaternary academic medical center. Interviews focused on the impact of COVID-19 surge practices on the following areas: (1) the experience of clinical care teams with the adaptations used to manage the surge (2) the perception and experience with the communication strategies utilized (3) the personal experience with the adaptations (i.e. how they impacted the individual) and (4) if participants had recommendations on strategies for future surges. We utilized rapid qualitative analysis methods to explore themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted five focus groups and 21 interviews. Three themes emerged from the work including (1) dynamic clinical experience with a lot of uncertainty, (2) the importance of visible leadership with a focus on sense-making, and (3) the significant emotional toll on care team members. Subthemes included sufficient workforce, role delineation and training, information sharing, the unique dichotomy between the need for flexibility and the need for structure, the importance of communication, and the emotional toll not only on the provider but their families. Several recommendations came from this work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 surge practices have had direct impact on hospitalists and care team members. Several tactics were identified to help mitigate the many negative effects of COVID-19 on frontline hospitalist providers and care teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":365748,"journal":{"name":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","volume":" ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851813/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00804-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Hospital systems have rapidly adapted to manage the influx of patients with COVID-19 and hospitalists, specialists in inpatient care, have been at the forefront of this response, rapidly adapting to serve the ever-changing needs of the community and hospital system. Institutional leaders, including clinical care team members and administrators, deployed many different strategies (i.e. adaptations) to manage the influx of patients. While many different strategies were utilized in hospitals across the United States, it is unclear how frontline care teams experienced these strategies and multifaceted changes. As these surge adaptations likely directly impact clinical care teams, we aimed to understand the perceptions and impact of these clinical care and staffing adaptations on hospitalists and care team members in order to optimize future surge plans.

Methods: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with hospitalist physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and hospital nursing and care management staff at a quaternary academic medical center. Interviews focused on the impact of COVID-19 surge practices on the following areas: (1) the experience of clinical care teams with the adaptations used to manage the surge (2) the perception and experience with the communication strategies utilized (3) the personal experience with the adaptations (i.e. how they impacted the individual) and (4) if participants had recommendations on strategies for future surges. We utilized rapid qualitative analysis methods to explore themes and subthemes.

Results: We conducted five focus groups and 21 interviews. Three themes emerged from the work including (1) dynamic clinical experience with a lot of uncertainty, (2) the importance of visible leadership with a focus on sense-making, and (3) the significant emotional toll on care team members. Subthemes included sufficient workforce, role delineation and training, information sharing, the unique dichotomy between the need for flexibility and the need for structure, the importance of communication, and the emotional toll not only on the provider but their families. Several recommendations came from this work.

Conclusions: COVID-19 surge practices have had direct impact on hospitalists and care team members. Several tactics were identified to help mitigate the many negative effects of COVID-19 on frontline hospitalist providers and care teams.

Abstract Image

利用快速定性分析方法研究COVID-19大流行期间激增适应对医院护理团队的影响。
背景:医院系统已经迅速适应,以管理COVID-19患者的涌入,医院医生,住院护理专家,一直站在这一应对的最前沿,迅速适应,以满足社区和医院系统不断变化的需求。机构领导人,包括临床护理小组成员和行政人员,部署了许多不同的战略(即适应)来管理患者的涌入。虽然美国各地的医院采用了许多不同的策略,但尚不清楚一线护理团队如何经历这些策略和多方面的变化。由于这些调整可能直接影响临床护理团队,我们旨在了解这些临床护理和人员调整对医院医生和护理团队成员的看法和影响,以优化未来的激增计划。方法:采用定性、半结构化访谈和焦点小组访谈法,对某四级学术医疗中心的住院医师、高级执业医师(APPs)、医院护理和护理管理人员进行访谈。访谈的重点是COVID-19激增实践对以下领域的影响:(1)临床护理团队对管理激增的适应措施的经验;(2)对所使用的沟通策略的看法和经验;(3)适应措施的个人经验(即它们对个人的影响);(4)参与者是否对未来激增的策略有建议。我们使用快速定性分析方法来探索主题和副主题。结果:我们进行了5个焦点小组和21个访谈。从这项工作中出现了三个主题,包括(1)充满不确定性的动态临床经验,(2)注重意义构建的可见领导的重要性,以及(3)对护理团队成员的重大情感损失。次级主题包括充足的劳动力、角色界定和培训、信息共享、灵活性需求和结构需求之间的独特二分法、沟通的重要性以及不仅对提供者而且对其家庭的情感代价。这项工作提出了几项建议。结论:COVID-19激增做法对医院医生和护理团队成员产生了直接影响。确定了几种策略,以帮助减轻COVID-19对一线医院提供者和护理团队的许多负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信