Hyaluronic acid injections for chronic tennis elbow.

IF 2.8
Gershon Zinger, Alexander Bregman, Ori Safran, Shaul Beyth, Amos Peyser
{"title":"Hyaluronic acid injections for chronic tennis elbow.","authors":"Gershon Zinger,&nbsp;Alexander Bregman,&nbsp;Ori Safran,&nbsp;Shaul Beyth,&nbsp;Amos Peyser","doi":"10.1186/s13102-022-00399-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For most patients, tennis elbow (TE) resolves within 6 months of onset. For those with persistent and painful TE, nonsurgical treatment options are limited. Thousands of studies have tried to find effective treatments for TE but have usually failed. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that injections with hyaluronic acid (HA) would be effective at reducing pain from chronic TE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a minimum of six months of pain from TE and with a pain level of 50 or greater (out of 100) were included in the study. They were randomized equally into one of two treatment groups: injection with HA or injection with saline control. Follow-up was conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months from the initial injection. Both the patient and the examiner at the follow-up visits were blinded to the treatment arm. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS pain) score at one year. Additional outcome measures included the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients were randomized into the HA injection treatment arm, and 17 (94%) completed the study. The average age was 51.9 years, and 10 of the subjects were male. Patients had an average of 28.1 months of pain before entering the study. The VAS score in the HA group decreased from a baseline of 76.4-14.3 at 12 months. All 17 patients in the HA group showed VAS score reductions above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of at least 18. The PRTEE score improved from 67 to 28.1. The QuickDASH score improved from 53.7 to 22.5. Follow-up in the saline group was less than 50% and was therefore not used as a comparator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HA injections yielded significant success in pain relief by three months. Patients continued to improve for the 12-month duration of the study. This study indicates that patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis may benefit from receiving injections of hyaluronic acid rather than having to undergo surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":520573,"journal":{"name":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753848/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00399-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: For most patients, tennis elbow (TE) resolves within 6 months of onset. For those with persistent and painful TE, nonsurgical treatment options are limited. Thousands of studies have tried to find effective treatments for TE but have usually failed. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that injections with hyaluronic acid (HA) would be effective at reducing pain from chronic TE.

Methods: Patients with a minimum of six months of pain from TE and with a pain level of 50 or greater (out of 100) were included in the study. They were randomized equally into one of two treatment groups: injection with HA or injection with saline control. Follow-up was conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months from the initial injection. Both the patient and the examiner at the follow-up visits were blinded to the treatment arm. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS pain) score at one year. Additional outcome measures included the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores.

Results: Eighteen patients were randomized into the HA injection treatment arm, and 17 (94%) completed the study. The average age was 51.9 years, and 10 of the subjects were male. Patients had an average of 28.1 months of pain before entering the study. The VAS score in the HA group decreased from a baseline of 76.4-14.3 at 12 months. All 17 patients in the HA group showed VAS score reductions above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of at least 18. The PRTEE score improved from 67 to 28.1. The QuickDASH score improved from 53.7 to 22.5. Follow-up in the saline group was less than 50% and was therefore not used as a comparator.

Conclusions: HA injections yielded significant success in pain relief by three months. Patients continued to improve for the 12-month duration of the study. This study indicates that patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis may benefit from receiving injections of hyaluronic acid rather than having to undergo surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

透明质酸注射治疗慢性网球肘。
背景:对于大多数患者,网球肘(TE)在发病6个月内消退。对于持续性疼痛性TE患者,非手术治疗的选择是有限的。成千上万的研究试图找到有效的治疗方法,但通常都以失败告终。在这项研究中,我们验证了注射透明质酸(HA)可以有效减轻慢性TE疼痛的假设。方法:至少有六个月疼痛的TE患者,疼痛水平为50或更高(满分为100)被纳入研究。他们被随机分为两个治疗组:注射HA或注射生理盐水对照。在首次注射后3、6和12个月进行随访。在随访中,患者和检查者对治疗组都是不知情的。主要结局指标为一年时视觉模拟评分(VAS疼痛)评分。其他结果测量包括缩短的手臂、肩膀和手的残疾问卷(QuickDASH)和患者评定网球肘评估(PRTEE)分数。结果:18例患者被随机分配到HA注射治疗组,17例(94%)完成了研究。平均年龄为51.9岁,10名受试者为男性。患者在进入研究前的平均疼痛时间为28.1个月。HA组的VAS评分在12个月时从76.4-14.3的基线下降。HA组所有17例患者的VAS评分均低于最小临床重要差异(MCID)至少18分。PRTEE评分由67分提高至28.1分。QuickDASH得分从53.7提高到22.5。生理盐水组的随访率低于50%,因此不能作为比较。结论:HA注射在三个月的疼痛缓解中取得了显著的成功。在12个月的研究期间,患者的病情持续改善。这项研究表明,慢性外上髁炎患者可能受益于接受透明质酸注射,而不是必须进行手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书